Comments by "Ricardo Cabeza" (@ricardocabeza6006) on "BREAKING: SCOTUS Leak HELPED Overturn Roe v. Wade" video.

  1. Bad time to mention that RBG wasn’t a fan of Roe?
    1
  2.  @MrMerve-tl9my  And the fact it wasn’t about women’s rights. It was about physician’s rights. Or the fact she viewed individual state codification as the ultimate goal. Yet, none of these fit the mainstream narrative the left wants to parrot.
    1
  3.  @ryandonaldson7369  Correct. So why are you upset that it’s been overturned? Follow RBG words, codify it...
    1
  4.  @ryandonaldson7369  Democrats have had 50 years to codify it. The party you’ve voted for has failed you. Accept it.
    1
  5.  @ryandonaldson7369  I really enjoy how you parrot the CNN headlines and don’t actually read any of the bills you supposedly want. Enjoy your tribalism!
    1
  6.  @ryandonaldson7369  I can’t tell you what you do and do not like about those bills. You would have to actually read them and then build a personal subjective opinion about them. But this isn’t what you do, you listen to what you’re suppose to like or dislike and build an ideological narrative around it. The fact that I have to blatantly explain this is absolutely pathetic.
    1
  7.  @ryandonaldson7369  So is now a bad time to point out that HR 3967 passed the senate in a 84-14 vote?... Now tell me, why did you blatantly lie by saying Republican senators blocked it? Or were you not lying, and were simply genuinely wrong due to your ignorance?
    1
  8.  @ryandonaldson7369  No, I get my information from the congressional website, where you can look up and track bills through Congress. Which there is no record of this new senate roll call. Remember how I said you watch CNN? This is exactly my point. You say, “this was literally all over the news YESTERDAY.” Turn off the main stream media and people who parrot them like Pakman, and get your information from unbiased sources. You are far to consumed by tribal politics and narratives. And I’m sure this new senate roll call will be listen on the congressional website soon, and it will also include the amendments the house made since the previous 84-14 vote. You say it was voted on again, which means the house amended it since the senate vote. The question you should be asking is what did the house change, that caused 30 senators to reverse their decision. But you don’t want to ask that, you want to point fingers at your political opposition, aka tribalism.
    1