Comments by "Ricardo Cabeza" (@ricardocabeza6006) on "Right-Wing Media MELTS DOWN Over Derek Chauvin Verdict" video.

I think I’ll be more shocked if any of the people you mentioned, are caught using counterfeit money, while high on fentanyl and meth and, hanging out with their drug dealer. But I’m glad George Floyd can be a such a wonderful role model, let’s immortalize him with a federal bill in his name.
3
I love when white liberals talk about a black person being racist. It’s just fantastic.
3
What did Maxine Waters say? Isn’t she a politician? Yeah, you’re right. This isn’t political at all.
3
Anna Spry ... I guess democrats haven’t changed since the reconstruction era... still burning cities over race.
2
@gangstalker5461 ... Oh. I didn’t know forgery was an addiction.
2
Because you know in this echo chamber, as a white liberal, you are safe to hate an individual for being black and having a different political ideology than you?
1
I watched the prosecution’s witnesses give conflicting testimony as the physiological cause of death. Meanwhile, let’s pretend the angry mob outside he courthouse had nothing to do with the verdict. Or the fact they would burn the city... again. Or the fact they had support to riot from democrat politicians... again.
1
HERSEY BERRY ... Incorrect. The jury was not sequestered for the duration of the trial. The defense attorney requested this numerous times and was denied. The jury was not sequestered the day Maxine Waters made her comment. The jury was not sequestered as they saw their city rioting over Daunte Wright. They were only sequestered once deliberations began Monday afternoon. This means they were sequestered for only 24 hours during a multiple week trial.
1
@ncwordman ... Hahahaha. Oh boy. The old “the parties switched” narrative. Robert Byrd used the filibuster for 13 hours to speak against the civil rights act. Robert Byrd was a Democrat Senator. Robert Byrd served in the senate until his death in 2010. At which point our current president eulogized him. As they were long time colleagues, as members of the same party in the senate. See, you don’t have to look beyond the White House, to find the connection of the modern democrat party to the party of Jim Crow.
1
@ncwordman ... Hahahaha. You’re still trying to push that narrative, even with the facts of modern politicians being against you? Now I know why you hate Joe Manchin so much, you miss Robert Byrd in that seat. Don’t worry. Biden misses his old pal too. You know, our president that sponsored (not just supported) a crime bill that lead to the disproportionate number of incarnated people of color. The man that said you weren’t black, unless you voted for him. Representing the party that says black people are incapable of getting ID. Yeah... not racist at all. Hahahaha
1
@ncwordman ... If you don’t know who Joe Manchin is. You truly are parroting a narrative you heard from someone else. Please attempt to educate yourself, prior to engaging in these types of conversations. Please attempt to learn about our president and his friend Robert Byrd. I promise it won’t fit your narrative.
1
@jorenvanderark3567 ... If the parties switched in the 1960s. I guess that makes FDR a “republican”. Since he held office before the supposed “switch”. Yet you don’t argue that. You selective apply the “switch” narrative when it fits your argument. While entirely ignoring Robert Byrd, his career and, his close relationship with our current president.
1
Well. When EVERY example is a criminal being arrest for committing a crime. Yeah, it’s kind of hard to pretend it’s a modern day Emmit Till. But please. As a woke white liberal, explain to the black woman how much racism there is. It should be entertaining.
1
Soooo... we shouldn’t point out the hypocrisy of CNN running a caption in their lower third stating “fiery but peaceful protest” as a building burns behind them?
1
@LadyPinkster ... Ohh. So they are naming the federal bill after him because, he’s a bad person?
1
@LadyPinkster ... What about the rest of Floyd’s life? I think all kids should look up to a convicted criminal.
1
@Boomboomroomish ... Yeah. You’re right. We really need a bill that reforms police procedure. The guilty verdict proves it. However, ignore the police testimony that said Chauvin did not follow procedure. You know, the testimony that helped lead to a guilty verdict. I’m just really glad you think we need to reform the protocol that Chauvin didn’t follow... makes perfect sense!
1
And not a single city would’ve burned last year. There would be no federal act named after him. There would be no marches in the street. How do I know? Because his name was Tony Timpa.
1
People were terrified of a not guilty verdict because, they knew their cities would burn and people would die as a result.
1
@s0ggywaffles338 ... Yeah. Totally. I remember all the social outrage for Tony Timpa.
1
@feynmanschwingere_mc2270 ... KKK? You mean the organization Democrat Senator Robert Byrd belonged to? You know, the anti civil rights senator that served in Congress until his death in 2010. At which point our current president eulogized him. That organization?
1
Aww. Why go for such an easy target? Why not go join the conversations on Crowder’s or Shapiro’s channel? Too many facts over there?
1
I love when I get a glimpse into the delusional imagination of a woke white liberal. Such a fascinating specimen.
1
@HalfCrazy520 ... So in other words, a white, new liberal. Thanks for verifying I was correct.
1
Yup. Had nothing to do with the angry mob standing outside. Ready to burn the city... again. With support from democrat politicians... again.
1
@Rolf Jander... Really? It wouldn’t be in the back of your mind that your name and home address is tied to that court case? That your well being with a not guilty verdict is just one doxing away? If that wouldn’t be on your mind, you’re not human.
1
Some members? Yes I’m sure some members believe he was guilty. All 12? In 24 hours? The only thing unanimous, was the knowledge that a not guilty verdict would cause their city to burn... again. With support from democrat politicians... again.
1
@ceb1970 ... Totally. Just like the OJ jury didn’t acquit as justice for Rodney King... Oh wait, twenty years later, they said that’s exactly what they did. Amazing, the stories only time will uncover. There’s a reason the national guard was deployed prior to the verdict being read. And it wasn’t for a guilty verdict...
1
@ceb1970 ... Honestly the guilty verdict doesn’t bother me. The guilty on three different charges of homicide bothers me. How is someone guilty of murder in the second degree and manslaughter? These are different situations involving homicide and, you can’t kill someone more than once. The only reason, is this entire case was political from the beginning. And the presence of the national guard is not irrelevant, if it’s for the reason I stated. It’s evidence of what everyone was aware of. Violence would ensue with a not guilty verdict.
1
@ceb1970 ... Well. I guess we have an answer since the alternate juror decided to give an interview. This is from the interview. Pay attention to the second half of her reply. Raguse: Did you want to be a juror? Christensen: I had mixed feelings. There was a question on the questionnaire about it and I put I did not know. The reason, at that time, was I did not know what the outcome was going to be, so I felt like either way you are going to disappoint one group or the other. I did not want to go through rioting and destruction again and I was concerned about people coming to my house if they were not happy with the verdict.
1
@ceb1970 ... To be fair, both can be possible. We can have a fearful jury that genuinely thinks he’s guilty. Being guilty on multiple homicides is indeed weird. I haven’t been able to find a solid answer on that. So both of us have no idea.
1
Kerry Foerster ... Great. Feel free to explain it rather than dismissively insult. It definitely seems like you don’t know either, with that kind of statement.
1