Comments by "Ricardo Cabeza" (@ricardocabeza6006) on "Biden considering PREEMPTIVE BLANKET pardons!" video.

  1.  @cathynewyork7918  Since only a jury can criminally convict someone, not Trump. What protection does he need? Only criminals need pardons. A pardon is useless to law abiding citizens.
    2
  2. So there is only backlash when Trump does something. If Biden does the same thing, it's good. Got it.
    1
  3.  @tbooth7201  I only care about hypocrites, like yourself. People like you that were upset when Trump pardoned Jared's dad. You feign a moral superiority. When in reality, you only care about morals when it's Trump. See, this is why millions of people like me didn't vote this year. This is why Democrats lost the election. But sure, keep being a hypocrite if you enjoy losing elections.
    1
  4. "If we, the people that actually matter"... Don't hurt your shoulder patting yourself on the back.
    1
  5.  @thirtyfive3d542  And this is why millions of people, including myself, didn't vote this year. You're exactly like the red hat people.
    1
  6. Why can't they be defended in front of a jury of their peers? They only need to be defended if they've committed a crime.
    1
  7. Democrats have never taken the high road. They just pretend to when they complain about Republicans. In reality, they do the exact same things. Congrats, you're just like the red hat people.
    1
  8. True. These criminals would be able to keep being criminals if Harris won.
    1
  9. These are normal times. You just don't like the results of the election.
    1
  10. A criminal conviction can only come from a jury, not a president. His revenge is irrelevant during a criminal trial. Why do these people need to be protected from a jury of their peers?
    1
  11. Well based on what people like you have said... this is political corruption. If it was when Trump did it, It is when Biden does it too.
    1
  12. Only a jury can convict someone. Why do these people need to be protected from a jury of their peers?
    1
  13.  @lisaanglim9588  A pardon is only useful if you have committed a crime. A pardon is useless for law abiding citizens. So what crimes did they commit? And remember, a jury convicts people, Trump does not.
    1
  14. When Trump was being charged with his crimes, you said indictments come from a grand jury, not a politically motivated prosecutor. What's changed?
    1
  15. Innocent people don't need pardons. A pardon is useless to law abiding citizens. And since only a jury can convict someone, why do all these people need to be protected from a jury of their peers?
    1
  16. These are normal times. You just don't like the results of the election.
    1
  17. Trump was charged by a Democrat prosecutor and convicted in a Democrat state during an election year. This was an obvious attempt to prevent him from winning the election.
    1
  18.  @reginakelly1783  Things are normal. Democrats lost the election. Someone loses the election every four years. It's normal, you just don't like the results.
    1
  19. So due to your rampant obsession of Trump over the past eight years, you have no problem with blatant political corruption? Wow, you sound exactly like the red hat people.
    1
  20. Presidents don't convict people, juries do. So why do these people need to be protected from a jury of their peers?
    1
  21.  @teardowndan5364  So investigating individuals for criminal activity is ludicrously expensive and bothersome, so we just shouldn't do it? Remind me, how much as been spent on Trump over the years?
    1
  22.  @teardowndan5364  Trump doesn't indict people, neither do prosecutors. In fact, a grand jury indicts based on evidence gathered in an investigation. So again, why do these people need to be protected from a jury of their peers?
    1
  23. All pardons are for criminals... A pardon is useless for law abiding citizens.
    1
  24. These are ordinary times, you just don't like the results of the election. Only a jury can convict someone. So why do all these people need to be protected from a jury of their peers?
    1
  25. Now this makes them look guilty in the eyes of everyone else. Only a jury can criminal convict someone, a president cannot. So why do these people need protection from a jury of their peers? Pardons are useless for law abiding citizens.
    1