Comments by "Ricardo Cabeza" (@ricardocabeza6006) on "Equating Guns to Cars is Really Stupid" video.

  1. So which amendment guarantees the right to own a vehicle and, explicitly states the right shall not be infringed? Can anyone tell me? I’ll wait...
    4
  2. Cars are also not a right granted in the constitution. Guess we found the difference...
    3
  3. My boyfriend has to use a weather balloon for a condom. But that’s because of his massive....
    2
  4. Well, if we are going off history. President Thomas Jefferson, in a letter of mark to a privateer, noted the second amendment extended to cannons on private warships. So... are you ok with me owning cannons? But not an armalite-15?
    2
  5. I’m naming my son Max just in case...
    2
  6. Do your republican friends ever ask you to show them the right granted in the constitution, to own and operate a vehicle? I’m looking for it and can’t find it. Do you know where it is?
    2
  7. Only if there was a mechanical device. That the constitution grants you the right to carry. That can protect you against even the largest of foes. Someone should invent some type of great equalizer. Then you’d be able to defend yourself.
    2
  8. Undocumented immigrants, by definition, do none of those things listed and still drive on the road. Yet, you have no issues with that.
    2
  9. So which amendment protects my right to own and operate a vehicle? Does it explicitly state that it shall not be infringed?
    2
  10.  @MBarberfan4life ... Does the first amendment explicitly state it shall not be infringed? What do you think those four words mean?
    2
  11. I actually prefer my fully-semi-automatic transmission...
    2
  12. Buy a gun. Load it. Set it on the table in front of you. And wait for it to kill someone. How long do you think it will take? While we are at it, can students blame pencils for failing exams?
    1
  13.  @kimwit1307 ... Correct. They are a very effective tool for leveling the playing field. Before the existence of firearms. The stronger and faster person always won. Firearms have been considered the great equalizer. But I’m assuming you’re not in favor of smaller and slower individuals having the ability to protect themselves. However, none of this changes the fact, a gun is an inanimate object. Just like a hammer, which only hammers nails when a human is holding it. Guns only kill people, when a human interacts with it. Now, with google and a hardware store. Two brothers did a lot of damage, almost instantaneously, in Boston, without any firearms. The problem is with humans wanting to cause harm...
    1
  14. Can you tell me a mechanical difference in the functionality of a semi-automatic shotgun and an Armalite-15?
    1
  15. Nope! No race car style vehicles here mister!!
    1
  16. There are zero hoops when purchasing a car, you don’t even need an driver’s license... and you are conveniently ignoring the requirements for a license to conceal carry.
    1
  17. Just like the other nine amendments of the bill of rights. The second amendment is speaking to the right of the individual. “A well regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state” is the context and background. It is the answer to the, “Why is this right necessary?” Because, what follows is “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. Now, what is your interpretation of those last four words? Because I never hear anyone on the left establish where the line is, when laws infringe on this right. Yet, I heard all summer long that requiring an ID disenfranchised voters.
    1
  18.  @ped200014 ... They don’t realize a government regulated militia is the military... by definition. Militias are not regulated by the government, that’s what makes them a militia. But they are regulated from within their own ranks.
    1
  19. Well, you’ve never seen a police chase end with a PIT maneuver. Have you?....
    1
  20.  @stuarthancock571 ... So the arresting officers didn’t have guns? Or would you prefer we only tell part of the story to fit the narrative you want?
    1
  21. Undocumented immigrants, by definition, don’t have a license... and you have no issue with that.
    1
  22.  @atomiccritter6492 ... Do we want to pretend undocumented immigrants don’t drive vehicles? Without a license or registration? While these individuals are harbored in sanctuary cities ran by democrats?
    1
  23.  @atomiccritter6492 ... I’m sorry. Is anything I just said false? If so, feel free to correct me. But judging by your attempt to attack my character rather than my argument, tells me you don’t have much to say on the subject.
    1
  24.  @atomiccritter6492 ... Yes. Of course. More frivolous insults.
    1
  25.  @chesterwilberforce9832 ... Yup! And until you have 2/3rds majority to amend the constitution. There is nothing to discuss.
    1
  26. Guns. I can go to a Check Into Cash. Get a loan the same day. Take that money to the gun store. And I’ll have to wait a week to get a handgun.
    1
  27. Undocumented immigrants, by definition, do not do these things. Yet they still drive on the road. And you have no issue with that.
    1
  28. Correct. So when the lunatic walks into the store that bought their gun a week ago. You are more proficient than them. You’d be shocked at the time required to accurately place shots with a hand gun, with a target 10 yards away. But I’m glad you’re an expert on the thing you’ve clearly never touched.
    1
  29. Columbine? Wasn’t that the shooting that occurred during the assault weapons ban Biden was just bragging about?...
    1
  30. So which part of the constitution grants the right to own and operate a vehicle? I’ll wait while you research this...
    1
  31.  @smcdonald9991 ... At least you’re willing to admit what Democrats actually want. I can actually respect that.
    1
  32.  @FakingANerve ... I’m sorry. Are you one of the democrats that wants to ban a weapon for cosmetic reasons? While the non “military style weapon” that mechanically functions the same is still available for purchase and, these types of events can continue to happen?
    1
  33.  @FakingANerve ... Do you think the majority of people who are registered democrats, do not fall into one of the two beliefs about 2A I just described? If so, I want what you’re smoking...
    1
  34. It sounds like you really care about responsible gun ownership. Do you think a class and a test for gun ownership will make someone care at the same level you do? And do you think someone who doesn’t care will retain any safety information they are forced to memorize for a test? Unfortunately you can’t legislate responsibility
    1
  35.  @leekress9209 ... Yes. Agreed. And removing the great equalizer reverts us back to survival of the fittest.
    1
  36. The virus/bacteria responsible for the next pandemic approves of this plan.
    1
  37. Unfortunately, the constitution would have a problem with those regulations being applied to guns. But I’m glad you want to compare it to something that is not constitutionally protected.
    1
  38.  AmericanPatriot14 ... Yet some how, simply requiring an ID disenfranchises people’s right to vote... But requiring a license for a firearm does not infringe on the only right that explicitly states it shall not be infringed.
    1
  39. Europe, where healthcare is free and no one is armed but, we just call America when dictators attempt to create empires.
    1
  40. See here’s the thing... Just like the other nine amendments of the bill of rights. The second amendment is speaking to the right of the individual. “A well regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state” is the context and background. It is the answer to the, “Why is this right necessary?” Because, what follows is “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. And what is your interpretation of those last four words?
    1
  41. Is that why these atrocities continuously happen in “gun free zones”? I just don’t understand why mass shootings don’t happen at gun shows and shooting ranges. If guns were the issue, wouldn’t there be more problems where there are more guns?
    1
  42. Is that why people in this comment section are specifically saying to abolish the second amendment?
    1
  43. Why do mass shootings never occur at gun shows or shooting ranges? Why are they consistently in “gun free zones”?
    1
  44.  @mrgroovy5113 ... Cool, since you think it’s a stupid analogy. Can we drop the argument that we need gun safety regulations, like we have with cars?...
    1
  45.  @mrgroovy5113 ... What is your interpretation of “shall not be infringed”? What level of regulation do you think would classify as infringing upon that right? Because I heard all summer long that simply requiring an ID, disenfranchised people’s right to vote.
    1
  46. Can we do the same thing with the first amendment and the right to vote? After all, those rights don’t even explicitly state they shall not be infringed. I shouldn’t need an ID to vote, because that’s “unconstitutional”. But I should have to take a class and receive a license to exercise my 2A right? Makes perfect sense...
    1
  47. The arguments really do get dumber and dumber. There really isn’t anything to argue. It’s very straight forward. And it’s amazing how many people don’t know the definition of infringe.
    1
  48. Can you tell me a mechanical difference in the functionality of a semi-automatic shotgun and what you’d call a “assault rifle” such as an Armalite-15?
    1
  49. Can anyone tell me a mechanical difference in the functionality of a semi-automatic shotgun and an Armalite-15?
    1
  50. The inherent hypocrisy in democrat argumentation they won’t acknowledge is twofold. 1) we should abolish guns, protection is a job for law enforcement 2) defund law enforcement, we can protect ourself
    1
  51. Yes. Certainly don’t read through the comment section of this video and see the statements that explicitly say the 2nd amendment should be abolished...
    1
  52.  @0Fyrebrand0 ... A militia is a military force comprised of private citizens. Those private citizens must be armed in order to form a militia. And yes, the constitution can be amended. Are we talking about a new constitutional amendment? Or are we talking about creating laws, laws that exist outside the constitution? There is a difference. And if you are in favor of such an amendment. Can you tell me the mechanical difference in functionality of a semi-automatic shotgun and an Armalite-15? I think you’ll find the answer to that question shocking.
    1
  53.  @Brianchse ... Can we make similar requirements for the right to vote? You must pass the US citizenship test to demonstrate you understand the functionality of American government before voting. We can do a background check to make sure you haven’t broken the law before you vote to help create laws. And we can do a mental evaluation to make sure you’re voting with a sound mind. Because right now, the narrative is simply requiring an ID to vote is disenfranchisement of someone rights.
    1
  54.  @Brianchse ... Well... I did see a lot of comments over the summer detailing how people who voted for Trump were responsible for the hundreds of thousands dead due to Trumps response to the pandemic. So... I believe it was this community that equated a ballot to mass murder.
    1
  55.  @michaelmorningstar8645 ... First off, can you tell me a mechanical difference between a semi-automatic shot gun and what you’d call an “assault riffle” such as an Armalite(AR)-15? Second, if I argue that we should be allowed to have anything the government has. (Which the government does not use AR-15s, military weapons mechanically function differently) You argue “what about nukes”. My response is simple, should the government have nukes?...
    1
  56.  @Brianchse ... It’s really not mental gymnastics. If requiring an ID to vote is disenfranchisement. Than anything you’re mentioning is surely infringement upon bearing arms. The difference is one right explicitly states it shall not be infringed. Those four words change everything.
    1
  57.  @Brianchse ... They are absolutely equatable. Because both rights exist as a result of the same document... and one explicitly states it shall not be infringed. And just remember. Those “mental gymnastics” were performed by people on this channel. I’m just referencing their opinion of Trump and the pandemic.
    1
  58.  @Brianchse ... My point is, the constitution has very specific language. Unless the conversation is to amend the constitution to include “common sense gun laws” then there is not a conversation to be had. And I find it absolutely amazing that the argument for gun laws without amending the constitution comes from the same individuals that say requiring an ID to vote is disenfranchisement. Now, if you’d like my opinion on amending the constitution to include requirements that you mention, I’m very open to that idea. However, that’s not the conversation being had. Now mind you, I hold this opinion as a survivor of the Las Vegas shooting. I was on site when that occurred. I hid for my life. I’ve experience this kind of event first hand. I’ve had just a normal work day be turned into chaos. I only mention this because of the final sentences of your comment. I highly doubt you’ll even believe me, which is why I don’t include this in my arguments. And I really don’t care if you do.
    1