Comments by "Ricardo Cabeza" (@ricardocabeza6006) on "Racist Caller: Ketanji Brown Jackson Not a "Real" Judge" video.

It’s a shame all of her worth is shadowed by the fact she was selected by her race and gender first.
3
Yup, she’s a non partisan judge that can’t define the word “woman”... FFS you’re delusional.
1
Would that attitude they have to face include being hired based on their race and gender first and, their qualifications second?
1
Thinking it’s acceptable to hire people based on race and gender first says a lot about you
1
@create_smarter “While I’ve been studying candidates’ backgrounds and writings, I’ve made no decisions except one: The person I will nominate will be someone with extraordinary qualifications, character, experience, and integrity, and that person will be the first Black woman ever nominated to the United States Supreme Court. “ -Joe Biden on Jan. 27, 2022
1
@create_smarter Have you ever thought about how the Civil Rights Act explicitly prohibits hiring people based on race and gender?...
1
@create_smarter I never said “only because of her race”... I said her race and gender were selected first. If Biden had said the only decision he made so far was it would be a white man, you’d call that racist. Don’t be a hypocrite.
1
@create_smarter Having two Hispanic sisters who went to Ivy League schools, how does it feel knowing they could never have been nominated as a justice because they were not the correct race according to Biden? By choosing race and gender first, he’s eliminated possible candidates from other minority groups solely based on their race. That’s racism. As you said, shouldn’t the Supreme Court represent America as a whole? Is America only white and black people?
1
Meanwhile, you all are cheering someone being selected based on race and gender first. Precisely what the civil rights act prohibits.
1
@docdray8546 Except he didn’t. Would you like to provide the quote where he did?... The quote you won’t be able to find...
1
@kevinstrother8712 Aww. I’m sorry. Does the random picture from the internet as my profile picture trigger you?
1
@marshablye9302 Provide a quote where he said the first decision he’s made was selecting a white conservative... Clearly your imagination is running wild.
1
@DutchiezRNG See the difference is... Biden explicitly stated he chose race and gender first. Your argument requires a subjective assumption. My argument requires a quote. See what I did there? Obviously not. “While I’ve been studying candidates’ backgrounds and writings, I’ve made no decisions except one: The person I will nominate will be someone with extraordinary qualifications, character, experience, and integrity, and that person will be the first Black woman ever nominated to the United States Supreme Court. “ -Joe Biden on Jan. 27, 2022
1
@elanperry1692 So because she’s qualified, the civil rights act doesn’t apply? Racism is ok as long as it’s justified? If I only want to hire white men, it’s ok as long as they are qualified? And yes, that did occur for a long time in this country. So why are we continuing to do it, even if it’s in the opposite direction?
1
@Swede7533 Aww see, why do you have to take Biden’s sentence where he explicitly stated he selected race and gender first out of context. You took his quote, and chopped it into pieces to make it sound the way you want. Use the whole quote without altering it.
1
@Swede7533 You took a compound sentence and completely omitted the second half. Quote Biden’s sentence as a whole... not out of context.
1
I wonder what the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the civil rights act would be, in regards to someone being appointed based on their race and gender first...
1
@stella.r2708 Once again... Biden was the one to make this about race and gender when he stated he made those decisions first. If Biden had said the only decision he made so far was that it would be a white man, you’d think that’s racist. Don’t be a hypocrite
1