Comments by "Ricardo Cabeza" (@ricardocabeza6006) on "If Trump Loses, How Will Trumpists Justify It?" video.

They will probable seek trauma counseling. Followed by a multi year witch hunt in attempt to find any evidence to discredit the results of the election. Any of this sound familiar?...
4
I guess republicans are not the only ones illiterate... “advocated” lmao...
1
@thematthew761 ... “advocated his throne” makes zero sense contextually. “Abdicated his throne” does. But don’t worry about educating yourself. We can pretend there is a historical precedence of rulers advocated their thrones... lmao
1
“Prove” is a verb not a noun... at least illiteracy is a bipartisan issue...
1
Derek ... you do realize it was not USPS and Carlson never said it was the “only” copies... but good job fabricating the details to fit your predetermined narrative...
1
Derek ... wow. You need to catch up. That wasn’t today, that was four days ago. Also, while we are at it. Here’s this fun fact written by Talia Kaplan for FoxNews, published yesterday... “The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee is investigating the newly released emails that reveal that Hunter Biden introduced his father to a top executive at Ukrainian natural gas firm Burisma Holdings in 2015 at Hunter's request.”
1
But can we also speculate how amazing the reactions will be by David’s audience if Trump wins...
1
@aeroripper ... “most won’t claim it was rigged or other nonsense” quickly followed by “like they’re trying in Texas already”.... thank you for a really good laugh.
1
Do you assume this because it’s what you’re familiar with from 2016?...
1
It’s not the left. They are not likely to take over multiple blocks of a major city for multiple weeks, claiming autonomy from all local, state and federal government.
1
@jamieohjamie ... I’m sure they really terrified all those people living in a wildlife refuge...
1
Derek ... keep pretending CHAZ didn’t exist... and the summer wasn’t filled with riots across the country from people that share your political beliefs.
1
@dguy321 ... I do agree. To bad Mr. Fentanyl didn’t agree on Memorial Day... but let me know when you find that martyr that doesn’t have a criminal background or caught in a felonious act.
1
Maybe they will launch a multi year investigation in attempt to find any amount of evidence to justify their initial claims, with no result.
1
@jerryspann8713 ... only in the mind of a Democrats can dictators win/lose elections... a dictator losing an election means they’re not a dictator...
1
@bigmike6461 ... well what was the democrats excuse for not finding evidence after russiagate?...
1
@bigmike6461 ... right. I’m aware they didn’t find any evidence for russiagate. I asked what was the excuse for not finding any?... no answer? Cool.
1
@bigmike6461 ... probably the part about evidence for russiagate... I’m not sure if you’re aware of what the suffix “gate” means. It’s a nod to the watergate scandal involving Nixon. Russiagate, implies Trump’s corrupt involvement in colluding with Russia. And as you’ve so stated, there is no evidence for russiagate. Now, you got a quick history lesson and actually learned something... why is there no evidence?
1
@bigmike6461 ... here’s some food for thought. Russia interfered with the election. Now if the goal was to have Trump elected, for Russia’s benefit. Why would Russia risk the credibility of the results by colluding with the campaign? If you’re primary opinion is Russia wanted Trump elected, it makes more sense that Russia would have done this in a covert manner, without jeopardizing the administration. But as a result of your “orange man bad” narrative, you don’t rationally look at the situation. All you want is evidence of corruption to prove the orange man is bad.
1
@Adam A-K... no. The question is not what will happen if Trump wins...
1