Comments by "Ricardo Cabeza" (@ricardocabeza6006) on "TEN Mass Shootings Over Easter Weekend" video.

Since you’re such an expert on American government. What’s the required majority for amending the constitution?...
2
But... if they include gang related shootings, suddenly they can no longer say mass shootings are the result of white racist people.
2
Yup. We need to put up more “Gun Free Zone” signs. That’ll stop them.
1
Yes, and Switzerland also requires males to serve in the military. The left in America would never allow that to happen.
1
So what culture do you live in where there are zero violent crimes committed?
1
@mxgr194 So your culture is to not be able to protect yourself during violent crimes?
1
@mxgr194 So you have zero violent crime?
1
@mxgr194 I’m not really sure how video cameras or locks will help you, once you become the victim of a violent crime. While those are great deterrents, they’re not going to protect you.
1
@mxgr194 When a moment occurs where you need a gun, you won’t be able pause life and go buy one. Do you only wear a seat belt when you feel like you’re around bad drivers? When you need a seat belt, it’s usually too late to put it on. Same concept.
1
@mxgr194 Oh ok. So Canada doesn’t have a military at all?
1
@mxgr194 Would you say you live in fear of fatal car crashes because you wear a seat belt?... I’m not rationalizing anything. You’re just simply not applying the same logic to all aspects of your life.
1
@mxgr194 You don’t need to have your life threatened with a gun, in order to protect yourself with one. You keep making these very narrow minded arguments that aren’t based in reality. Honestly, I don’t own one, so I have no issue if you don’t want to own one but, don’t pretend you don’t understand it. You do understand it, you’re just not willing to apply equal logic to the topic, so you can say you don’t understand it.
1
@mxgr194 So we are back to you making the claim that you don’t have any violent crimes? You’re arguing in circles. In addition, violent crimes don’t necessarily require a gun to be involved. So arguing with gun violence statistics is another example of a narrow minded argument that’s not based in reality.
1
@mxgr194 Why are you stuck on gun crime statistics? Why are you arguing this narrow window of statistical data, when violent crimes don’t even require a gun to be involved? FFS, this is just astounding to witness. Also, a population difference doesn’t make a difference in a per capita statistic. Your stupidity is amazing.
1
Let me know when there is a mass shooting at a gun show or gun range...
1
Hey dumb dumb. A militia regulated by the government is a military... Hence why a national guard unit can be called into active military duty and why all National Guardsmen go to Army Basic Training. It’s the military. Also, to own an automatic or mil-spec rifle, you must have a class 3 Federal Firearms License. Please stop parroting misinformation. You clearly don’t have a clue what you’re talking about.
1
You mean the country with a monarch doesn’t allow their citizens to bare arms? Weird... Almost like the 2nd amendment was written for that very reason.
1
Chicago and New York have some of the strictest gun laws in the country. Yet, lead in daily shootings.
1
And you live in a country that’s had a monarch or totalitarian ruler in the last two hundred years.
1
@guidofanzini It’s not irrelevant at all. It’s the entire purpose of the second amendment. And feel free to name your country.
1
@guidofanzini And of that 12.27 of 100k, are those only legal gun owners? If not, what law can be put in place to prevent someone from owning one, that’s willing to obtain a gun illegally? It’s already illegal to possess a gun in New York or Chicago, yet they are the leading cities in gun violence. Ireland?... like I said, a country under a monarch in the last two centuries. How did I know? It must be magic.
1
@guidofanzini You mean the country that still has their queen on their dollar? Lol
1
Most of Europe was also under a totalitarian ruler less than a century ago...
1
@deannilvalli6579 So what happened in Paris on June 14, 1940... Also, notice to use of the word “most” before the word “Europe”. “Most” does not mean “all.”
1
@deannilvalli6579 It’s not irrelevant. It’s the entire purpose of the second amendment.
1
@deannilvalli6579 Well dumb dumb, a government regulated militia is called a military. Hence why State National Guard units can be called into active service. Because it’s the military. Seems like you need a dictionary before you try reading it again. Also, pro 2A individuals do not believe only certain people should have guns, like the 3rd Reich did. Actually, it’s you who wants the government to decide who can and cannot own a weapon. If this doesn’t sound familiar. Try reading the history you’re trying to profess.
1
@alanbeaumont4848 Hey dumb dumb. A militia regulated by the government is a military... Learn the definitions of these words, you’ll appear more intelligent than you really are.
1
You know what a militia regulated by the government is called?... A military. See buddy, that part isn’t ignored, they just actually understand the definitions of the words used.
1
@tomm3950 No, what I’m saying is a well regulated militia by definition cannot be regulated by the state. That’s the defining component of a militia. FFS you’re dumb.
1
When you call the police to respond to a shooting. Would you say they are good guys with guns? Or are you purposefully calling more bad guys with guns? Which one are they?
1
@nihatnihat8264 You might be wary but, in that kind of situation you still want them to respond. Or do you suggest the police should just not respond to any shootings?
1
@nihatnihat8264 I brought up cops because you do think you need “good guys with guns”. It’s why they are always called during a shooting.
1