General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Ricardo Cabeza
David Pakman Show
comments
Comments by "Ricardo Cabeza" (@ricardocabeza6006) on "ANOTHER: Donald Trump DISQUALIFIED from Maine ballot" video.
What law was Biden following when he kept classified documents from his time as a senator nearly two decades ago?
2
We literally have an amendment that says a jury decision is required. Or did you want to skip over the fifth amendment when it doesn't suit your desired outcome?
2
@PhannoPuff So why are you actively ignoring section 1 of the 14th amendment and the requirement of due process? Seems like you're the one doing the things you're accusing others of.
1
@PhannoPuff Running for office is a privilege of citizenship...
1
@PhannoPuff Naturalized citizens can also run for office. Where do you think Ilhan Omar was born? She was born in Somalia. But is now able to hold office as a US Citizen. Now for the Presidency, you have to be natural-born. And tell me, is Trump natural-born? Citizenship is the first requirement for all elected offices in the US. Because running and holding office is a privilege of citizenship. You know this is true, no need to feign ignorance for the sake of a partisan narrative.
1
@PhannoPuff Wow, you got really quiet. What happened?
1
@PhannoPuff Is Trump a Naturalized citizen or Natural-born citizen...? This is simple stuff. I'm not sure why you are now trying to pretend like Trump isn't a natural-born citizen, with the privilege of being President, just like every other natural-born citizen. Your question about naturalized citizens is not applicable to Trump.
1
@PhannoPuff What's the first requirement for every elected office in the United States...? It's really a simple question. I know you can answer it. Just try your best. All this ballot removal nonsense is just for the sensational news headlines. The Colorado ruling has a stay written into it, meaning he will be on the ballot unless SCOTUS disqualifies him. Don't act confused when all this goes away.
1
@artvandelay8030 What does the first sentence of the fifth amendment say...?
1
@bigmike6461 Insurrection is a crime, and he has not been convicted of it. Conviction requires a jury.
1
@nicholascrow8133 What do you think "the right of the people" means in the second amendment...? Who are "the people"...?
1
@bigmike6461 Oh, can you provide the example of the confederate precedent you're claiming exists? Who has been prohibited from holding office without criminal conviction? Please, substantiate your claims or admit you made it up. And GOP senators are not a jury as the fifth amendment requires. But keep trying!
1
@artvandelay8030 You mean "due process"...? Does the first sentence of the fifth say that DUE process must be served eventually? Come on, quote it don't avoid it.
1
@bigmike6461 Couy Griffin did receive a conviction for his actions on Jan. 6th. Convicted on June 17, 2022. Kenneth Worthy and other's that did not have a conviction all occurred before the 1871 Amnesty Act. There is no modern example of what you are claiming, without a criminal conviction. But even with all this information, you'll still get upset when SCOTUS overturns these decisions.
1
@nicholascrow8133 Regulation in regards to a military or militia does not mean legislation, like you want to pretend. Regulations are things such as uniform standards. A well regulated militia has self imposed standards. A militia regulated by a government is a military. Also, Officer of the United States is a specific classification of office and are appointed positions within our government. Such as a US Ambassador.
1
@nicholascrow8133 No, it means every citizen has a right to own one. A militia, by definition, is not regulated by a government. That's what makes it a militia. Therefore, a "well regulated militia" does not mean it's regulated by the government. That would be a contradiction of the words used. But you already know all this, you're just feigning ignorance for the sake of a partisan narrative.
1
@nicholascrow8133 Actually, I'm not. That's what your ideological peers are saying. According to your ideological peers, any judge can determine someone ineligible for office without due process. And now we are watching the leading opposition to the incumbent being removed from the ballot. That's not democracy.
1
What does the 14th Amendment say about due process in Section 1?
1
@backalleycqc4790 Is it whataboutism or is it that no one should be above the law? Which is it?
1
@backalleycqc4790 Do you think this is TikTok? That's not a good sign.
1
@backalleycqc4790 You mean the Department of Justice, that is led by the Attorney General, which is a Presidential cabinet level position and serves at the behest of the President? You sure you want to talk about Biden's administration attempting to imprison his political opponent? Typically, people like you want to avoid discussing that at all costs.
1
I can't wait until SCOTUS overturns these decisions and you lose your mind.
1
So you want to be like other countries that lack due process? How telling.
1
So you want an authoritarian government?
1
Prove he's innovent? That's not how due process works. You know due process, it's talked about in the part of the 14th Amendment you skipped over.
1
When i see how blindly Democrats support the opposition being removed from ballots and possibly imprisoned before the election, I am amazed that they don't just cancel the election entirely.
1
The only death from violence was an unarmed female shot by police. Don't spread misinformation.
1
Democrats: Telling you who you can vote for
1
It's honestly quite sad that you're being lied to for the sake of sensational headlines. The Colorado Court wrote a stay into their decision. Meaning that Trump will appear on the ballot unless SCOTUS rules he is ineligible. This will result in Trump being on the ballot and you being very confused as to why. When you are lost and confused as to why he is on the ballot, remember this moment and how the media ignored the truth and told you what you want to hear.
1
So why don't you want to uphold the rule of due process? Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law by a jury of peers. It's really simple stuff.
1
Nah, clearly people want to ignore the first sentence of the fifth amendment.
1