Comments by "Hihowareyou Hihowareyou" (@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688) on "GDF" channel.

  1.  @Regionalbattles At the cost of your people?
    4
  2.  @AlbyNoob  They are fighting for a ☪️ state in Kashmir and ☪️ is not freedom, so they are not freedom fighters.
    3
  3.  @AlbyNoob  It might be more militarized but that doesn’t mean it’s worse.
    2
  4. What is your solution to Kashmir?
    1
  5.  @oof9420  So my solution would be for Kashmirs that don’t like India, to leave India. Kashmir is a conflict zone and conflict zones don’t get treated better than other areas.
    1
  6. It’s because of politics.
    1
  7.  @hellothere1656  Just because u don't understand how the govt works doesn't mean I don't lol. Yes, that is a very important reason for why the Pakistani govt is obsesed over Kashmir, especially when the Pakistani population is increasing. U said the same brotherhood dialogue with East Pakistan and how did that turn out?
    1
  8.  @hellothere1656  That's just kremli propagand. Russia wanted control and influence over Ukraine and didn't like how Ukraine was moving closer to the West. Pakistan was trying to gain as much land as possible after partition. It's hilarious how u watch GDF but don't know the ulterior motives behind govt actions.
    1
  9.  @hellothere1656  That's just krmlin propganda. Russia wanted control and influence over Ukraine and didn't like how Ukraine was moving closer to the West. Pakistan was trying to gain as much land as possible after partition. It's hilarious how u watch GDF but don't know the ulteror motves behind govt actions.
    1
  10.  @hellothere1656  That's just kremlin propagand. Russia wanted control and influence over Ukraine and didn't like how Ukraine was moving closer to the West.
    1
  11.  @hellothere1656  Pakistan was trying to gain as much land as possible after partition.
    1
  12.  @hellothere1656  U have no idea what water wrs are 🤣 Wrs have been fought over oil but somehow u think wrs can’t be fought over 💧🤣 Pakistan itself is not an ethnic group so how can u look similar to Kashmiris? There is no “brotherhood” that exists between Pakistan and Kashmir.
    1
  13.  @hellothere1656  But Pakistan did claim ☪️ majority Kashmir and Gilgit Baltistan so what’s your point? 🤣 Pakistan was simply waiting for the perfect opportunity to do it.
    1
  14.  @hellothere1656  Pakistan has been trying to take over Kashmir since it was formed. That is enough proof that this is a water wr. Get over it. U can’t cover up the truth.
    1
  15.  @hellothere1656  Where is ur proof that Allah exists? Even if I give proof, u will still make the same argument. Accept this fact before asking me for anymore proof. “Pakistan precipitated the war a few weeks after its independence by launching tribal lashkar (militias) from Waziristan, in an effort to capture Kashmir and to preempt the possibility of its ruler joining India.” Now u will deny it like usual.
    1
  16.  @hellothere1656  U haven’t debunked anything when u don’t know how to make a logical response. Simply looking up sources isn’t debunking anything. U don’t understand logical fallacies and that’s not my problem.
    1
  17.  @hellothere1656  False, I only talked about Pakistan because they want Kashmir. U are the one who got triggered by that and started talking about ☪️ countries, 🕉️ countries ect... U tried to make the argument that 🕉️ govts are incompeten when compared to ☪️ ones. That somehow, the religious demographics of a govt has an effec on its performance. That is ur passion, not mine.
    1
  18.  @hellothere1656  Indians go to Arab countries to work temporarily, not to immigrate there, unlike ur people who go to the west to live there permanently. Arab countries need Indian labor and they are the ones trying to get Indian labor in India. They are the ones confiscatin Indian passports when Indians workers arrive in the Gulf. And it's not only Indians going to the gulf either.
    1
  19.  @hellothere1656  U didn’t make any proper arguments when they are filled with logical fallacies and by just ignoring them, proves that u lost 😂😂. U think u have proven something when u didn’t lol.
    1
  20.  @hellothere1656  I don’t have to be a H or an Indian to tell u the truth. U just made up ur own subjective criteria to claim that a book can prove the supernatural. Ur argument is basically if a book is like the Quran, then it can prove Allah, which is a circular argument. By ur logic, if a book is like Vedas, then it can prove Ram 😂🤦. How many scientific claims does a book need to have or how many times does that book need to get the future right and how do u this information? Allah didn’t tell u this so u are simply making up ur own proof of Allah.
    1
  21.  @hellothere1656  The Quran is not a fact book 🤣🤣. The Quran is a myth book. There is no evidence that Adam, Isa, angels ect.. exist. U just simply believe everything the Quran says as a fact without actually factchecking all of its claims. My point is that a book can be correct on some things and incorrect on other things.
    1
  22.  @hellothere1656  That’s not the point. U believe it was a miracle that the Quran mentioned the expanding universe when it was already mentioned in the Bible. Therefore, it’s not a miracle anymore when it was already known to humanity before the Quran. In fact, the Quran gets plenty of information and stories from the Bible and somehow u think the Quran is a miracle for saying similar things that are mentioned in the Bible? U somewhat believe in the Bible because the Quran wants u to believe it’s from the same God when the reality is that the author of the Quran is just using similar information from the Bible. This whole unprotected and edited part is completely overblown, otherwise u wouldn’t have easily quote the Bible.
    1
  23.  @hellothere1656  A Bible is a collection of books and all of the Bibles have atleast the same 66 books in its collection. If u are talking about different version of the Bible, the Quran has different versions too, depending on the Arabic dialect (which can have vastly different meanings when translated into English). Again, the Bible already talked about the beginning of the universe before the Quran. Ancient Greek scholars like “such as Thales the Milesian believed that water not only sustained life, but created it as well” and this was also known before the Quran.
    1
  24.  @hellothere1656  A quarter of the entire human population is still a minority and now u are making an ad populum fallacy. The number of followers doesn’t mean that religion is true. Many people are also leaving ☪️ and it would be a greater number if there wasn’t family pressure/apostasy laws. Not only that, ur countries (like Pakistan) are not even showing YouTubers who challenge ☪️. Many of ur countries have blasphey laws (including Pakistan), punishable by 💀. Many people who become ☪️ leave ☪️ after a few years.
    1
  25.  @hellothere1656  U mean the scientific miracles that was already mentioned before in other scriptures and scholars before the Quran? 🤣 Let me guess, now u are going to read a Quran verse and try to interpret it to fit modern science 😂
    1
  26.  @hellothere1656  U focused on the religious demographics of a govt and somehow linked it to how rich the country is, when there is no connection at all. Only u would compare 50+ with two countries because of religion. Only u would give excuses for Pakistan because it was colonized and not give the same excuse for India or Nepal. Only u would not be bothered with Bangladesh outperforming Pakistan economically because of religion. In fact, u would gladly accept it but u wouldn’t do that with India because of religion. Only u would not care that India has a higher gdp per capita (which is hard to achieve for more populated countries), HDI, quality of life, multidimensional povrty index, global peace index, global innovation index ect… when compared to Pakistan.
    1
  27.  @hellothere1656  The Mughal empire did not make India richer than it was before. India already made up a huge share of the world economy before the Mughals and that is a fact. European empires made their countries rich before they even colonized because of industrialization. The Mughals failed to industrialize India and this a fact. Because of the Mughals falures, India has fallen to colonial rule (which actually helped India industrialize). South Asia is not rich because of the Mughals and u keep praising them because of religion.
    1
  28.  @hellothere1656  The British empire is something to brag about because it actually made the UK rich. The Mughals did not make India rich. End of story. Just because Israel is given plenty of money by the west doesn’t mean it’s a fake country. The Quran didn’t discover anything because much of that information was already known before the Quran and the Quran didn’t actually prove any of its scientific claims either. It’s the scientists that made the scientific discoveries by actually proving it, not the Quran.
    1
  29.  @hellothere1656  How does scientific discoveries in the Quran prove Allah exists? That’s like saying lighting proves the existence of Zeus. Anyone can just claim that something is proof for something else but how did u know that in the first place? Did Allah tell u that? How can I care for something that u are just blindly saying is proof for ur deity?
    1
  30.  @hellothere1656  Truth is that Israel exists and is a real country. You’re actually using politics and emotion to deny the existence of Israel.
    1
  31.  @hellothere1656  Except history doesn’t work that way. Just because Al Khwarizmi doesn’t exist doesn’t mean I won’t type on my device. That’s simply a non sequitur fallacy.
    1
  32.  @hellothere1656  I can be sure that Al Khwarizmi would have never invented algebra if it wasn’t for past inventions by looking at the timeline of events. It’s not a coincidence that Al Khwarizmi starts inventing algebra after the past inventors. Inventions never occur spontaneously and always rely on previous known knowledge.
    1
  33.  @hellothere1656  Nigeria also faces a 🚽 issue so your point is mute. Imagine defending coruption because India is less corupt than many ☪️ countries 💀.
    1
  34.  @hellothere1656  You’re not a mathematician or a time traveler for u to claim that the west wouldn’t have been able to make advance algorithms without Al Khwarizmi. I don’t think u understand how your history logic is a logical fallacy 🤣 Disbelievers are the most responsible for the device I’m using and that is a fact. Then prove it’s a real colony kid. Tell me who Israel a colony of and prove it. How are u able to differentiate a real country from a real colony? Countries don’t recognize other countries for political reasons and u keep using that as your defense for emotional reasons, proving my point.
    1
  35.  @hellothere1656  I gave u plenty of sources countering everything u said. The fact of the matter is that India has a higher GDP and GDP per capita so India is richer than Pakistan. Get over it. Pakistan has more strategic advantages because it has a smaller population and is less diverse than India. But still India has a lower pvery than Pakistan (based on the multidimensional pverty index) and that hunger index u keep on using is based on population size, hence a joke when it comes to examining India.
    1
  36.  @hellothere1656  U didn’t counter anything lol. All u did is move the goalpost which is a logical fallacy again 😂 We are talking about the gdp per capita currently so stop moving the goalpost so u can talk about the past 🤣 Again, the multidimensional pverty index already disprove your claim about Pakistan having a lower pverty rate than India. Get over it.
    1
  37.  @hellothere1656  Mountain ranges are responsible for rivers and without rivers, the entire Pakistani civilization wouldn’t exist. The only reason Pakistan has a large population is because of the Indus Valley. Mountain ranges also provided important timber, animal products, and minerals, gold, silver, tin and semiprecious stones that were traded throughout the Indus Valley. Not all of Pakistan is mountainous and Switzerland is rich despite being completely mountainous, so your excuse doesn’t work.
    1
  38.  @hellothere1656  U think the technological advancement of the entire world is based on one person lmao. That’s your logic which I don’t believe in. There is no way u can prove that my device wouldn’t be here without believers. In fact, whether Khwarizmi believed or not is irrelevant to the work he did.
    1
  39.  @hellothere1656  It’s not just one source. It is a comprehensive study, that takes into consideration multiple sources (some of which u already listed). How can u claim a comprehensive study got countered by stats that are also used in the comprehensive study too 🤦 🤣. U just keep reiterating the same information regardless of how many sources u used. U don’t understand that arbitrary monetary values are not accurate in measuring pverty. Get over it.
    1
  40.  @hellothere1656  Even based on the description u copied from Wikipedia, simply measuring height or weight doesn’t mean huger problems, so u just proved how unreliable it is. Are u saying being richer and more developed than Pakistan is not important? Then why do u believe Pakistan is better than Nepal when Nepal has less huger by the same source u used? 🤣
    1
  41.  @hellothere1656  U don’t think mountains guarantee safety for Pakistan? 🤣🤣 The only thing u have proven is that Pakistan can’t develop with mountains but Switzerland can 🤣🤣 Pakistan colonized Bangladesh and still can’t develop 🤣🤣
    1
  42.  @hellothere1656  The bottom line is that India has a higher GDP per capita and HDI when compared to Pakistan. U can keep focusing on irrelevant information while I look at the bigger picture, which is that India is ranked as the 30th best country overall on the 2023 US News best countries list, while Pakistan did not make the list. India (60) is also ranked higher than Pakistan (68) on the 2024 quality of life index by Numbeo.
    1
  43.  @hellothere1656  I didn’t ignore. My sources already taken that into account. It’s not about number of sources, but the quality of sources. Furthermore, u keep repeating the same information from different sources. India doesn’t have to be better than Pakistan on every single stat for someone to logically conclude that India is better than Pakistan overall. But we know u won’t admit it because of your biases. Now stop repeating the same information and prove the existence of Allah.
    1
  44.  @hellothere1656  Who said mountains are the only form of natural protection? U haven’t presented any evidence which proves that mountains hinder economic growth. Just because Bangladesh chose Pakistan doesn’t mean it wasn’t colonization. Pakistan was richer than Bangladesh until Bangladesh got independence and then Bangladesh was able to overtake the Pakistani economy, proving that Pakistan held back Bangladesh economically for decades.
    1
  45.  @hellothere1656  N Korea GDP numbers are not reliable. I will keep mentioning the US news and world report because it’s a reliable source which u refuse to admit 😂😂 Keep playing games kid. Not my problem that u can’t find the source 🤣🤣
    1
  46.  @hellothere1656  Only thing u have exposed is that u can’t find the source or the source is unavailable in your country 🤣🤣 Yep, I believe India is the 30th best country and your comments prove it.
    1
  47.  @hellothere1656  U haven’t presented any evidence that mountains hinder development. Switzerland has the highest HDI in the world. They have built effective infrastructure on terrain filled with mountains. U don’t have a source which proves that Azad Kashmir has a higher gdp per capita than IOK. Pakistan had control over Bangladesh, so they are to blame for the situation in Bangladesh. That is why Bangladesh asked for independence from Pakistan and asked for Indian assistance.
    1
  48.  @hellothere1656  Except that the site is US news, I went on it plenty of times and I can list all the countries on it. Absolutely no proof that site is Indian. The website u are going on is simply mentioning India’s rank on the real website.
    1
  49.  @hellothere1656  If u are just going to ignore everything I write, then what’s the point of replying to me? I specifically told u that different sources calculate GDP differently so u can’t claim Azad Kashmir and Gilgit Baltistan as having a higher gdp per capita than IOK, especially when I found higher IOK GDP per capita figures on other sources. Just because your country wasn’t colonized doesn’t make u rich. In fact, the least colonized people end up being the poores because they are isolated. Just look at the Amazon people, the most isolated tribes in Africa ect…
    1
  50.  @hellothere1656  Not all countries prioritize education and innovation at the same rate. Pakistan prioritizes religion above all else, especially in ur tribal regions. Had Pakistan not been colonized, would it even exist? Pakistan is the way it is because of the decisions ur people made and Switzerland is rich because of the decisions their people made. Simply seizing up land or resources doesn’t make u rich, otherwise Africa would be rich already. This is a fallcious argument. Just because u give two people the same opportunities doesn’t mean both will succeed.
    1