Comments by "D W" (@DW-op7ly) on "Inside China Business" channel.

  1. 219
  2. 154
  3. 95
  4. 83
  5. 74
  6. 64
  7. 38
  8. 29
  9. 28
  10. 26
  11. 26
  12. 25
  13.  @MrNickjberry you have no clue what you are talking about In China in 2008 around 70% of the people in their real estate markets were buying their 1st homes in their cities By 2018 around 70% of the people in their real estate markets were buying their 2nd and 3rd homes in their cities That’s why you are hearing about problems with their property developers these days. Because back in 2010? Their Central Government started cutting of money flow to these developers. Thus why you heard about Shadow Banks and Underground Economy back then, that their Government had to come into to shutdown or regulate. Even then, It took them almost 14 years to get their overheated real estate under control Heck they were about to introduce a nation wide property tax, but then trump started the trade war in 2018 Why is their Central Government doing this? Because there are still a few hundred million poorer rural folk they still expect to move to the cities to join their more well off urban city folk countrymen. Problem is these property developers were building higher end homes, and not building the affordable homes these rural migrants will need In China Owning a home in the city you migrate to? Affects your employment, health, education and even marriage prospects don’t have a house you don’t get married Thus the common prosperity push and the crackdown on the overt displays of wealth in China Their Government probably figured out you disenfranchise the people at the bottom of your society they are the ones most likely to act out in protest
    25
  14. 24
  15. 22
  16. 20
  17.  @MrNickjberry  The Chinese had “virtually” no chip making ability/foundries 6 years ago thanks to the USA who did the job for the Chinese Where their Government was trying to get their people to switch to homegrown chips before the sanctions China is now expected to take over those legacy chip markets If the USA was smarter instead of cutting off China from semiconductor chips and equipment for manufacturing They should have themselves and their allies, lowered prices even more, and dump even more chips on China Instead their idea was to force the hand of Chinese people at the time content with cheap imported chips. Hope they could not innovate When there is now a 7 volume 27 book series on what China invented first that says the world copied from them And China leads the world in 37 of the 44 critical technologies of the future 🙄 At one point China was importing over 300 billion in chips a year Now they will probably be exporting around 200 billion dollars worth of their own homegrown chips per year, within the products they export 👇 How Close Is China to World Dominance in Legacy Semiconductors? 27-02-2024 | By Paul Whytock * Bread and Butter Technology Obviously, China would like to be a major player when it comes to high-end sophisticated semiconductor devices, but that doesn’t mean they are not interested in the bread-and-butter end of the market, particularly when it comes to legacy products. In fact, they are very interested in the legacy market, and there are some very good reasons why. Legacy devices make up a huge amount of global chip sales. Most chips manufactured today are not advanced chips but legacy chips, and around 71% of devices * China's Aggressive Expansion in the Semiconductor Industry In September 2023, Reuters reported that China was set to launch a new state-backed fund aimed at raising about €43bn to support its chip industry, and according to research analysts, the Rhodium Group, in less than ten years, China is expected to domestically add nearly as much 50–180nm wafer manufacturing capacity as the rest of the World. The views of industry analysts and observers vary, but generally speaking, it’s thought that 22 wafer fabs are being built in the country, and there is an overall plan to create a total of 30 new wafer fabrication plants. Many of these will concentrate on the production of legacy devices. As for market share, industry intelligence gatherers Trendforce believe China’s legacy chip manufacturing base could provide as much as 30% of the global demand for older devices. ElectroPages
    20
  18. 19
  19. 18
  20. 18
  21. 17
  22. 17
  23. 16
  24. 16
  25. 16
  26. 15
  27. 14
  28. 14
  29. 13
  30. 13
  31. 13
  32. 13
  33. 13
  34. 12
  35. 12
  36. 12
  37. European Economic Review Volume 144, May 2022, 104079 Asian American Discrimination in Harvard Admissions Among typical applicants, Asian Americans actually have a slightly higher unconditional admit rate than whites. But as we show in Section 3, these unconditional admit rates mask substantial differences in qualifications between the two groups. While it is widely understood that Asian American applicants are academically stronger than whites, it is startling just how much stronger they are. During the period we analyze, there were 42% more white applicants than Asian American applicants overall. Yet, among those who were in the top ten percent of applicants based on grades and test scores, Asian American applicants outnumbered white applicants by more than 45%.2 Of course, Harvard values more than just academics. And here, too, Asian American applicants as a whole perform as well or better than white applicants on most of Harvard’s ratings. But Harvard’s ratings may also be affected by racial preferences and penalties. Indeed, Harvard acknowledges that race, in the form of preferences for under-represented minority groups (URMs), is one of the inputs into the overall rating (Day 4 Trial Transcript, p. 50).3 Consistent with this, we find large racial gaps in the assignment of the overall rating conditional on academic strength. Similar patterns hold for the personal rating, suggesting that this measure is also directly influenced by race. Further, we show that racial groups who have observed characteristics associated with lower overall and personal ratings score higher on these ratings, again suggesting a direct role of race Science Direct
    12
  38. 11
  39. 11
  40. 11
  41. 11
  42. 11
  43. 11
  44. 10
  45. 10
  46. 10
  47. 10
  48. 10
  49. 10
  50. 10