Comments by "D W" (@DW-op7ly) on ""De-Risking" goes both ways as China dumps US Treasury positions, now at lowest level since 2010" video.

  1. 10
  2. 2
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6.  @kenlee1416  Difference a lot of that US Treasury debt that is being printed up is being put on the US FED Balance Sheet in Q3 of 2019 The US FED was bailing out those TOOBIGTOFAIL banks in their repo markets once again… less their credit markets seize up once again A few things we learned since the 2008 subprime crisis Buying for US debt is not unlimited. In 2013 the US FED had to buy 71% of the newly issued external Sovereign debt by the US Treasury That Quantitative Easing (QE)debt that was soaped up/printing of money, that debt does not disappear Since we know from Q3 of 2017 to Q3 of 2019 the FEDs bright idea was to allow 50 to 60 billion of the Agency Debt and US Treasury Debt it soaped up during QE to slowly mature each month, off the FEDs balance sheet. Quantitative Tightening (QT) Where the US Treasury would issue new corresponding debt for the public to buy. Where with this QT selling they managed to dump about 600 to 700 billion in debt on the American people… as the American people are the biggest buyers of US Sovereign Debt That QT selling ended during Q3 of 2019 Because that selling of debt ended up freezing up the repo market Just like when it happened in 2008/2009 during the subprime crisis Thus the FED balance sheet went from 4.5 trillion to about 3.8 trillion.with that selling from 2017 to 2019 But then the FED had to come back in QE 2.0 and buy that Treasury debt again, all that they dumped and more Last I checked they ran that FED balance sheeet back up to over 8 trillion. Now it’s back to around 7.8 trillion Wait you might ask Agency debt is internal debt not supposed to be backed by the US Government Well the USA has had no issue with taking private internal debt and turning it into External Sovereign Debt backed by the US Government and the American people Something the Chinese might have been tempted to do with the Junk Bonds issued by those Chinese Property Developers That were a hot commodity the last few years, sought after by sophisticated foreign investors In short the Chinese purposely deflated their real estate markets. Cut off money to its Property Developers. And didnt bailout foreign investors who took a risk buying those junk bonds While the USA left their real estate market to implode. Kept the money flowing to the companies and bailed out foreign investors who invested in private internal debt Yet we are complaining who is capitalist/communist 👇 As politicians call for taxpayer bailouts and a government takeover of troubled mortgage lenders Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, FreedomWorks would like to point out that a bailout is a transfer of possibly hundreds of billions of U.S. tax dollars to sophisticated investors and governments overseas. The top five foreign holders of Freddie and Fannie long-term debt are China, Japan, the Cayman Islands, Luxembourg, and Belgium. In total foreign investors hold over $1.3 trillion in these agency bonds, according to the U.S. Treasury’s most recent “Report on Foreign Portfolio Holdings of U.S. Securities.” FreedomWorks President Matt Kibbe commented, “The prospectus for every GSE bond clearly states that it is not backed by the United States government. That’s why investors holding agency bonds already receive a significant risk premium over Treasuries.” “A bailout at this stage would be the worst possible outcome for American taxpayers and mortgage holders, who have been paying a risk premium to these foreign investors.” “It would change the rules of the game retroactively and would directly subsidize the risks taken by sophisticated foreign investors.” “A bailout of GSE bondholders would be perhaps the greatest taxpayer rip-off in American history. It is bad economics and you can be sure it is terrible politics.” FreedomWorks
    1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. How Much Money Does the World Owe China? Our research, based on a comprehensive new data set, shows that China has extended many more loans to developing countries than previously known. This systematic underreporting of Chinese loans has created a “hidden debt” problem – meaning that debtor countries and international institutions alike have an incomplete picture on how much countries around the world owe to China and under which conditions. In total, the Chinese state and its subsidiaries have lent about $1.5 trillion in direct loans and trade credits to more than 150 countries around the globe. This has turned China into the world’s largest official creditor — surpassing traditional, official lenders such as the World Bank, the IMF, or all OECD creditor governments combined. Despite the large size of China’s overseas lending boom, no official data exists on the resulting debt flows and stocks. China does not report on its international lending, and Chinese loans literally fall through the cracks of traditional data-gathering institutions. For example, credit rating agencies, such as Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s, or data providers, such as Bloomberg, focus on private creditors, but China’s lending is state sponsored, and therefore off their radar screen. Debtor countries themselves often do not collect data on debt owed by state-owned companies, which are the main recipients of Chinese loans. In addition, China is not a member of the Paris Club (an informal group of creditor nations) or the OECD, both of which collect data on lending by official creditors. HarvardBusinessReview
    1
  12. 1