Comments by "Tamarlane " (@Tamarlane389) on "Why won’t Tory MPs use the word ‘Islamophobia’? | LBC debate" video.

  1.  @BadlydrawnBen you literally proved his point 😂
    5
  2.  @andyd568 that still wouldn’t save Anderson in this case. He attacked the Mayor of London with no proof. You don’t walk away from that suicidal charge
    4
  3. So any Muslim will trigger fear and anxiety in you?
    4
  4.  @abdell75roussos really? Explain antisemitism then
    2
  5.  @Gehri_soch2.0 because no Islamists were called out. That’s the only uncontested fact in the whole case and you missed it.
    2
  6. That’s the question. Did it HAVE to?
    1
  7.  @theloniouswu5090 I bet the searches will bring up sketchy and untrustworthy sources
    1
  8.  @ryantate6447 pick a lane dude 😂😂😂
    1
  9. They now want to change the meaning of the word to ensure Anderson’s comments no longer meet the criteria. To put it another way: When violating the rights of citizens, instead of rectifying the issue, they try convince the victims that no violation has taken place by changing what constitutes islamophobia. At precisely the same time they narrow the criteria for Islamophobia, the expand the criteria for antisemitism to now include objecting to Israel’s many war crimes.
    1
  10. By your definition, you will feel fear and anxiety when seeing a homosexual person. Is that correct?
    1
  11.  @edwinmoreton2136  I also note the words ‘real threats’. So in the example of Khan, what’s a real threat?
    1
  12.  @Gehri_soch2.0  you haven’t a shred of proof and neither does he. The days of Anderson, you and your ilk are coming to a swift end. Khan is wiping the floor with his mayoral candidate rivals
    1