Comments by "Alex" (@alexatedw) on "Valuetainment" channel.

  1. lol
    4
  2.  @Kj-ud7xw  it doesn’t matter what you think. Any one with eyes can see it
    4
  3. Lol
    4
  4. Lolol. No. No he’s not
    3
  5. Lol you mean catastrophes
    3
  6. It’s like when Jesse waters was like $20 and hour? What is that 6 figures?
    3
  7. Lol
    3
  8. Patrick ain’t got nothing on Yang!
    3
  9.  @mics5129  idk about that. He was still doing it in his most recent interview with David packman
    3
  10.  @ag3nto578  it’s like saying OJ is not a murderer. We all know he is
    3
  11. Nah. He’s the only sane one on the panel
    3
  12. Patrick got destroyed in this one... I'd expect a stronger defense
    3
  13.  @adamgonzalez7450  yea they stood outside while kids got slaughtered. That’s not the training
    3
  14. She def gets it a lot more than this panel
    3
  15. Lol it’s about what percent of the riches income they pay. Not what percent of the total share of taxes…. Pat is trying to manipulate stats as he often does
    3
  16. I don’t think this panel knows what white priveledge is
    3
  17. Lol Tates a rapist
    3
  18. lol Candice is a bozo. It’s an insult to compare her to Candice
    3
  19. lol trump is afraid to lose again
    3
  20.  @FJB8885  asking how many genders there are is like asking how many colors there are. Both exist on a spectrum. Be careful not to conflate sex with gender. When you’re asking what is a woman, that’s two words with one spelling. One refers to woman as a sex the other is associated with gender. Which one are you asking about?
    3
  21. Lol
    3
  22. Lol
    3
  23.  @ntif0314  lol
    3
  24. lol Elon is a tool
    3
  25. She doesn’t want to join a losing ticket.
    3
  26. Lol that’s because we only let the ones in that are studying…
    3
  27. He was trying to be cheap, not diverse. Lol
    3
  28. Says the anon account online lol
    3
  29. Tate should go live in Russia
    3
  30. Charlie Kirk is a grifter lol
    3
  31. This guy doesn’t understand stats
    3
  32. What? No he didnt
    3
  33.  @IchabodvanTassel98  yes exactly
    3
  34. Lol yea Pat is a meat head. Logic did him in again
    3
  35.  @treznoir  yea. I noticed that Patrick often jumps the gun on what arguments he thinks you are bringing up. Props to him for having the debate but I don’t think his position (Patrick’s) is as solid as he thinks it is ever
    3
  36.  @johnspence8141  no. He’s very well spoken. I think most people are on teams so no matter what, you’re gonna see pat as the winner. I love pat but I’m more objective. Packman killed this one
    3
  37.  @55cook  well both sides will be seen at fault from the opposite sides viewpoint
    3
  38.  @IM-bq7ep  they do have that ability. That’s what a strike is
    3
  39. Sidney never seemed credible. It’s amazing how easy the right is conned
    3
  40.  @srharris88  yes he is playing a character and fox owns that IP…
    3
  41. Need a better anti legalization guy. That was an easy debate
    3
  42. It’s not about the “lies”. It’s about the rep damage fox did
    3
  43. They do. They still can’t win
    3
  44. Lol no. Because chatgpt is an application. It’s not the tech
    3
  45. We def don’t want a criminal like Trump though. Let’s go with someone not two decades into retirement
    2
  46. Yes there should be a cap on wages.
    2
  47. lol love to see Pat melt down
    2
  48. This bearded guy is just wrong
    2
  49. Lolol these guys are so weak
    2
  50. lol it’s likely Trump will try something
    2