Comments by "Nicholas Conder" (@nicholasconder4703) on "The Wall Street Journal" channel.

@blokin5039 Yes, and one can start with "Russkiy Mir" and Dugin's "Foundations of Geopolitics". A lot of Putin's material comes straight from the latter.
5
@oot8089 Doesn't mean they won't adopt it.
4
@mra.prasetio There may have been countries that are part of NATO involved, but that is different from NATO being involved. A lot of NATO countries didn't participate in those invasions. It's the reason that the Americans started selling "Freedom Fries" instead of "French Fries" during the 2nd Iraq War.
4
@ricksarazin1379 It exists as much as the "International Jewish Conspiracy" did. It is a vague target or bogeyman that can be blamed for anything that doesn't work. Like "counter-revolutionaries" of the French Revolution or Communist states.
2
@LA-kc7ev It's a shame more people aren't aware that the occupants of the Kremlin are taking their main talking points from the Russian equivalent of "Mein Kampf". It might make them sit up and pay attention to what is happening inside Russia if they did.
2
@lahabitaciondelatrapado4621 It won't matter what source you read or listen to, there will always be bias. One needs to look through as much material as possible, analyze it with as little prejudice as possible, then make your own decision. A working knowledge of history helps considerably, as this can shine a light on possible motivations and causes underlying the rhetoric. At the end of the day, it is up to the reader to try and make an unbiased analysis from biased data, without cherry-picking facts to fit a preconceived narrative. Unfortunately, too many people do the latter, often ignoring evidence that does not support their preconceived ideas and prejudices.
2
Just watch the expression on the face of the guy presenting the Project 2025's agenda. He is a fanatical cultist who is apathetic towards the rights of others and to whom facts mean nothing.
1