Comments by "nrb1989" (@nrb1989) on "BREAKING: Andrew Tate Reacts To Florida Prosecution" video.

  1.  @miavanniekerk2648  happy you got your son back but some people lost their daughters :(
    26
  2. Candace this is ridiculous. Of all the things in the world to do, platforming Andrew Tate is not important. Like at all. As you said about Weinstein, he is an immoral man. So unless you are developing a schtick and niche for exclusively covering "men who are immoral but I like them," I don't get why you repeatedly leverage your reputation for him. As much as you go on and on about evil in this world, you aren't clear headed about this guy. It's pretty sad.... Ok so Florida doesn't like him...ok and? It's just not the most important thing in the world.
    16
  3. Ok so why condemn Elon if you continue to support someone like Andrew Tate? Looks so incredibly hypocritical
    14
  4. @ the people who's 15 year old daughter who, as Tate pointed out, had never done s3x work before. She's literally still in the webcam industry where he brought her and left her. Obviously it's her choice now but he has said this out of his own mouth when he thought it was a good idea to teach the folks in his war room to do the kind of immoral-but-not-illegal things he did: he specifically targeted these teen girls because they were young, impressionable, and had never done s3x work before and therefore super naive.
    12
  5. @ you can easily just use Google too instead of "what are you even talking about," my love. Google is free and your fingers clearly work lol. Hope your daughter is never one of these naive girls, or your son never aspires to do the kinds of things the Tate bothers admitted to get rich after Tate's boxing career.
    10
  6. Genuinely curious what there is to be proud of and grateful. What exactly did they do that everyone should be "proud" of in your view?
    7
  7. @ yep he sure does and Candace is mum on that while she’s here being his defense attorney lol
    4
  8.  @BevResto  he told his war room 7 though publicly it looks like he publicly favors the kids of the two main women he has talked about. But who knows. He's not exactly credible so I don't believe a lot of what comes out of his mouth.
    3
  9. 1000000% agreed. People who have common sense all agree on this. Not sure why Candace feels the need to platform his issues or challenges....of ALL the people in the world?
    3
  10. 100000000% agreed with you because it makes no senses considering how Candace goes on and on about immoral men. He's literally one of them, yet she can't find it in herself to condemn him the way she has Weinstein. We're only 2 episodes into her series and she has said it many many times, yet can't say the same about Tate. I think it's obvious why.
    3
  11. Exactly completely agree
    3
  12.  @anoushka_a  yep I got that. The way the English language works, you and so many others here are part of the "everyone" that is not myself lol. Hence the usage. So let me clarify (to which you can decide to answer me or not because this is the internet and you owe me nothing 😂): I am genuinely curious why anyone, e.g. YOU or anyone who else who feels the same, would be proud (hope we're clear here). Is there a definitive reason or it's just vibes and feelings?
    2
  13. How are they teaching "CRT"? 😂 Critical Race Theory is a legal class for students in law school. Not even undergrad. Law school. Do you mean they are teaching your kid that he is inferior? Is this what you mean?
    2
  14.  @platypups  I'm a lawyer and know precisely what I'm talking about though dear. I have no idea what undergrad you went to but sounds like you should get your money back. But you're not disproving my point about this being a collegiate thing. In any case, AS I SAID, it is not taught to children.
    2
  15.  @spinecollector9931  yes it makes sense that it might be a extracurricular offering that an undergrad student who isn't on the law track would pay extra for because it's not exactly on the course schema for, as an example, a Classical Art major. It's really only required for law students to understand how our laws were leveraged for bad (e.g. redlining, school-to-prison pipeline, and topics like the historical wealth gap promulgated by banks who intentionally would not give loans to black businesses). I agree these topics might be too advanced for kids depending on their age. But as for the topics themselves, they are facts of history. I wish they weren't but they just are. So my question is that if kids can learn about something as emotionally deep as the holocaust that is part of another country's history, shouldn't they at some point learn about ours? I don't know what the line should be but it certainly isn't banning history just because some ppl are ashamed of it. The people alive today didn't do this stuff so I guess I don't see the harm in talking about what happened so history doesn't repeat itself in other waves like AI, etc.
    2
  16. 100000% agreed. He can go live in the UK or there
    2
  17.  @dondavis8588  you didn't have to care to comment on a comment you don't agree with, yet here you are though 😂
    2
  18. Faith over politics, Candace. Geez ☹️
    2
  19. 10000000% agreed her. Also disappointed
    1
  20.  @antewehlen4236  I feel the same. I don't get how she doesn't see it as hypocritical
    1
  21. @ if everyone felt like that way we would be thinking differently about what's happening in the world, yet Americans aren't are they? We can't pick and choose when we want to be saviors and think people won't call you out on it
    1
  22. @ as many as he has helped he has also hurt with the production and proliferation of content for webcam businesses. So, I hear your point but you can just as easily argue the opposite: the Tate brothers have also gamed society it uncountable ways that they have admitted. Literally bragging about siphoning hundreds of thousands from men who thought they found a mail order wife.
    1
  23. Also super disappointed. What is the point of platforming them?
    1
  24.  @GusMac-kv7zi  I'm assuming you don't mean where I have literally, physically been? 😂
    1
  25. Ahhhhhh ok ok that would make sense.
    1
  26. @ nope actually if you take the wax out and listen you'll hear PRECISELY the issue people have: 1) there are actually moral people to fight for that did not take the shortcuts that Andrew Tate and his brother took to get money after his boxing career ended on shambles. 2) Candace bills herself as this crusader for truth and morality obviously people with common sense will all questions about how #1 squares with #2. Literally, the barely legal teenage girls (15 on Romania apparently is legal age) that he brought into the webcam industry are literally still there where he left them. And he was specially looking for young, impressionable women that had NEVER DONE WEBCAME WORK BEFORE. You know he has a super aggressive personality. Imagine your 15 year old teenage daughter trying to win an argument with this version of Andrew Tate. Excuse me if people aren't falling over making sure this guy is treated fairly. Again, people HAVE THE RIGHT to not care about his constitutional rights or any others when he violates our moral code. You guys simply have to deal with that....and something tells me you'd feel differently if it was your child. Hope your 15 year old teen never meets a guy like Andrew Tate and that your boy child never aspires to do that things these brothers did to make money after Tate's failed boxing career.
    1
  27.  @Skylimit-hd2qk  and ignorance has overcome yours buddy
    1
  28. Genuinely curious why he doesn't go back to the UK? He'd literally just be taking the advice all conservatives give liberals when they complain about the U.S. as much as he has over the years.
    1
  29. Why doesn't he go there??
    1
  30. "Inhumane"?? Really. Wow 😂
    1