Comments by "AugmentedGravity" (@AugmentedGravity) on "Real Engineering" channel.

  1. Fidget Spinner.
    43
  2. Imagine if it would be more expensive.
    32
  3. I’ve been waiting for this. What a fantastic video and great explanations for really very complicated topics. If i was to nit pick on anything in the video it is the lack of mentions of the names of different systems on the jet itself, and maybe just the pronounciations of some of the stuff mentioned in the video, like the F-117 as F one seventeen and F-135 as F one thirty five. Brilliant stuff from you guys as always. This warms my Air Force heart truly.
    17
  4. I have lost ALOT of respect for Boeing over the past few years.
    14
  5. Now this. This is something truly special.
    7
  6. 9:27 Blud has hit something😭
    7
  7. Still to this day one of the single coolest pieces of technology humanity has ever created. The look of the Nighthawk is just legendary.
    6
  8. It is the most expensive SYSTEM in history yes, but not the most expensive single entity in the US arsenal. The carriers and a B-2 for example are both more expensive single units.
    5
  9.  @ilovecops5499  You drunk?
    4
  10. JSM, JSOW, SOM has entered the chat. S-500 has left the chat.
    4
  11.  @jnonya7743  Its not rising. Its doing the exact opposite.
    4
  12. I worked with C-130's for a year and i absolutely love these machines. A special place in my heart.
    4
  13. I couldn’t help but notice the rather large ammount of NLAW footage being used in this video instead of that of the actual Javelin. The terminology for the arangement of the shaped charges found in AGM’s like the Javelin is tandem-warhead.
    4
  14.  @deadwingdomain  Starlink will have little to no effect on earth based astronomy.
    3
  15. 1:17 T H I C C
    3
  16. Ah yes. The ever giving story of the Serbian shootdown of the F-117. Never fails to attract the bots and experts.
    3
  17. Nervous sweating
    3
  18. The 35 can brrrrt on its own, just not as loud.
    3
  19. ah yes. Grey's Anatomy.
    3
  20. Sadly one of the most misunderstood and ridiculed military aircraft in history. Good to see that people are finally starting to realize this, even though its been over 15 years since i started this discussion.
    3
  21. Also, i would pinpoint which model of the 35, not just "the F-35".
    3
  22. Can't you gear the shaft?
    2
  23.  @EgorKaskader  No. SImply because AA stands for air to air/anti air. That means killing things that are in the air. Not on the ground. That is ATG (air to ground).
    2
  24.  @EgorKaskader  Look up the definition you.
    2
  25.  @EgorKaskader  I don't really care as long as i'm right. Sorry if i offended you.
    2
  26. Thunderbolt II.
    2
  27. Sad to see things go so backwards.
    2
  28. Says MiG, shows Sukhoi haha
    2
  29. When you use sound as your weapon
    2
  30.  @StoutProper  Umm no.
    2
  31. And they just look so damn cool.
    2
  32.  @ilovecops5499  k
    2
  33. What a plane.
    2
  34. Just tossing billion ey?
    2
  35. An absolute marvel of engineering.
    2
  36. Although the true hero of the battle of Britain was the Hurricane
    2
  37.  @8888stealth  And that's not what happened in this case.
    2
  38. Norway is such an interessting country in this. The people from Norway know.
    2
  39. The biggest machine is ME.
    2
  40. Well, that's not how that works so no.
    2
  41. Hypersonics are a very very over-hyped topic in the defence sector. I really hope they haven't based their entire budget plan of this on that.
    2
  42. Sad that.
    2
  43. I think it looks pretty darn cool.
    2
  44. Ofcourse it had to be a DC-10....
    2
  45. Man i love stupid.
    2
  46. Yes yess yesss
    2
  47. This gives me biiig “aerodynamics of a cow” vibes.
    2
  48. Imagine being such a genius. I envy these people.
    2
  49. My ears are bleeding from that metal scratching.
    2
  50. Yes.
    2
  51.  @frankieM_  Combat load goes to the 35, Pilot safety goes to the 35, because it doesn't need to get up close and personal with the enemy to be effective. Ground safety?i'm not sure what you put into that category but sure. The 35 can do CAS, superbly well for the last time. This discussion has been going on since at least 2010. And in the gulf war, the most effective CAS plane was actually the AV-8B.
    2
  52. This video is going to be outdated in just a couple of years as the price continues to go down
    2
  53. no fam.
    2
  54. Props are louder than jets. Would maybe guess it was the other way round but no
    2
  55. Association? You mean Administration??
    2
  56.  @sandraanderson311  For what it can do, it's really a steal.
    2
  57. I never appreciate the amount of, imo, undeserved criticism the F-4 and its variants get.
    2
  58. So bottom line is, we need that fusion reactor STAT
    2
  59. GET THEM ON THE GRID
    2
  60. Sus.
    2
  61.  @khaccanhle1930  No competition?
    2
  62. Since it was conceived.
    2
  63.  fireson23  No, no no no no aand no.
    2
  64. You should look at norway.
    2
  65. The coolest fighter ever made.
    2
  66. I want. So bad.
    2
  67. What camera did you use?
    2
  68. That was one smooooth transition.
    2
  69. 0:13 YEET
    2
  70. Just sad.
    2
  71.  @ericsuarez834  sorry what?
    2
  72.  @ericsuarez834  what is pretty clear is that talking sense into someone with a profile picture like you is absolutely impossible and a waste of time.
    2
  73. 7:39 KSP!
    1
  74.  @deadwingdomain  why?
    1
  75.  @thethirdman225  No they wouldn't.
    1
  76.  @Durzo1259  ...
    1
  77. it won't go right away, they will be fazed out as time goes on. Other planes are able to fly with parts of their wings missing too, that's a good design philosophy. FWD's are a great example of that. The Warthog is a legend, but sadly out of time.
    1
  78.  @StreetSWAT  Umm no.
    1
  79.  @StreetSWAT  made it up?
    1
  80.  @8888stealth  I can ask you the exact same thing, how ya know that?
    1
  81.  @8888stealth  But that doesn't mean it happens every time. And not as many times as you might think. Its easy to make assumptions and jump to conclusions, but it doesn't have to be as corrupt and shitty as is often believed.
    1
  82.  @ChucksSEADnDEAD  No they were not.
    1
  83.  @auregamer5  Buy n Large
    1
  84.  @WalrusWinking  exactly.
    1
  85. ?
    1
  86. that's the thing.
    1
  87.  @dazaspc  Umm no.
    1
  88.  @dazaspc  Yes, and that does not help your case.
    1
  89.  @boatymcboatface666  Well, you can only do so much.
    1
  90.  @Maka556  Yes.
    1
  91. if you really wanted to.
    1
  92. Well that isn't exactly what's happening.
    1
  93. Did these models factor in things like a suddden leap in battery and energy storrage technology and up and comming power production methods like the illusive fusion?
    1
  94. Huh?
    1
  95.  @yyxy.oncesaid  huh?
    1
  96. Ehrm
    1
  97.  Norm T  Since when didn't the F-35 fly? And have you seen the condition of for example Germany's air force? only about 10% of their total Eurofighter fleet is in service because they are so hard to maintain and spare parts are not available and expensive.
    1
  98. But can't do half the things the 35 can.
    1
  99.  @JB-qg2uc  and?
    1
  100.  @aayushpaliwal3450  Doubt it.
    1
  101.  @sumott497  For example.
    1
  102. At some things. Not others.
    1
  103. Fuck april fools
    1