Comments by "freedom dove" (@freedomdove) on "Soft White Underbelly" channel.

  1. Your "science" is made up by twerkers in bow-ties and lab coats. Lol.
    1
  2. Right. God forbid you think for yourself. LOL.
    1
  3. People who believe we live on a water-covered spinning rocket ball have zero critical thinking skills. You don't even know how ridiculous the heliocentric model is. Lol.
    1
  4. It digressed a long time ago when people were brainwashed into thinking we live on a water-covered spinning rocket ball.
    1
  5. Wow, you're so intelligent....
    1
  6.  @JackBlack-x4k  Gravity is an unproven theory. Electromagnetism and electro-static charges are provable, demonstrable, repeatable, and observable. You can't prove gravity, since it's a bunch of BS. What theory are you even prescribing to? Newtonian or Einsteinian "gravity"? They can't even figure out their own theories. LOL.
    1
  7.  @JackBlack-x4k  LOL. 🤣
    1
  8.  @JackBlack-x4k  Do you really need someone to tell you that we don't live on a snowball? LMAO!!! At any rate, a snowball isn't water conformed to the outside of container. Nice try, though. NOT. 😂
    1
  9.  @JackBlack-x4k  And I've already told you that gravity is a BS unproven theory. You can't replicate it here on Earth. What you can replicate is electrostatic and electromagnetism. These are things we can observe very easily. Water NEVER bends and conforms to the outside of a ball. I almost feel sorry for you that you can't understand these simple concepts. LOL.
    1
  10.  @JackBlack-x4k  LOL. You're just grasping at straws now. Electrostactic and electromagnetism are LAWS. "Gravity" is a theory. They were here long before Newton. And again, water does NOT bend, as it would have to do if we lived on a sphere. You never see curved lakes or oceans. Water ALWAYS finds its level. Why is this so hard for you to understand? All you can do is keep parroting the globalist's narrative. You seem incapable of thinking for yourself.
    1
  11.  @JackBlack-x4k  That's because we're NOT on a spinning ball, for Pete's sake!! LOL. Only globalists say we're on a sphere. We live on a flat, level, and motionless plane. Pilots train this way. Their own literature assumes such.
    1
  12. 6:34 mark: Did you really just call this person "really beautiful" while dissing Apollos for being a flat Earther? LOL. Where is your discretion? Some of your interviews are okay but I just can't jive with your mentality all the time. You literally praise the most disgusting and disturbed people in this world and condemn someone who questions NASA and the globalist agenda. SMH.... 🤦‍♀🙄 8:28 mark: Does she really think she's smarter than anyone else b/c she's a side-show freak with "life" experience? 🤔 Oh, honey, you're definitely not superior. Lol. Is this supposed to be a person to lust after? That fake hair and those fake boobs are sickening. Idk why anyone would want that. This person is seriously mentally disabled. GOD help her/him/it/whatever. 17:06-17:25 mark: Did you really compare this mental disorder with coffee drinking? LOL! Wow, this is unreal..... 18:40 mark: You really can't make this sh*t up. We are living in upside down world where you people think this is good and acceptable. Lol. 19:57 mark: She acts like she didn't bring this on herself by heavily modifying her body. Lol. How depressing to think that men were actually paying this person on OnlyFans. Absolutely disgusting. Elon Musk and his "space" endeavors are just as ridiculous and fake as this person saying that its body is sexy or desirable. This thing is ghetto. 🤮 Well, she's right about that one thing. Just be the best human you can be. IMO, that means don't be fake. Don't be controlled. This persons seems very fake. God help her/him/it. 25:22 mark: LOL, I can give you an interview where I'm drinking screwdrivers in a proper manner. GOD help this person.
    1
  13.  @julesdomes6064  Actually it does. We live on a level and motionless plane. This is demonstrable, repeatable, and observable.
    1
  14. I pray for her healing. 🙏
    1
  15. He would never accept the challenge because he's a fraud.
    1
  16. The ISS is a bunch of BS lies. They use zero-G planes to pull off their little stunts--which are always highly edited.
    1
  17. So, Genius, please demonstrate how water can conform to the outside of a container.
    1
  18.  @julesdomes6064  You poor brainwashed person. Lol.
    1
  19. Right? Why would you want to realize you've been lied to all your life? That would be devastating, eh?
    1
  20. God forbid you think for yourself. LOL.
    1
  21. No.
    1
  22.  @scottdouglas935  We don't live on a ball, so the question is mute. Why would water flow to the "center" of a ball?
    1
  23.  @scottdouglas935  Huh? Lol.
    1
  24. It may not matter to you, but it does matter to others who are trapped in the heliocentric model--where they believe we "evolved" from pond scum....
    1
  25. 41:03 mark: Well, maybe if you didn't look like the devil then people wouldn't ask you that question. LOL. Freak.
    1
  26. Huh? Nobody went to the moon, honey. LOL.
    1
  27.  @krystekk1 Yes, it's fake. We already proved that the "rocks" from the moon are fake.
    1
  28.  @julesdomes6064  You never debunked me and I never ran away from any post. Again, genius, please make trillions of tons of water conform to the outside of container.
    1
  29.  @julesdomes6064  Right. So please conform large amounts of water to the outside of a ball. "Gravity" is a BS unproven theory. You can't replicate it here on Earth. Large bodies of water physically can't cling to the outside of a ball. Water droplets don't count, and neither do bubbles. That water is on its own in suspension. It's not sticking the outside of a ball in large amounts. You've never seen that happen because it can't.
    1
  30.  @julesdomes6064  No, it's not proven. You can't replicate it. Which gravity do you prescribe to, anyways? Newton or Einstein? They can't seem to make up their minds. Lol. You know what's real and measurable and observable and repeatable? Electrostatic and electromagnetic forces. They are the strongest forces on Earth.
    1
  31.  @julesdomes6064  That wasn't an answer. And you claim that I run away from the conversation? LOL. You're a joke.
    1
  32.  @julesdomes6064  I have researched the topic. Have you? Gravity is the weakest "force" on Earth, yet you expect it to hold trillions of tons of water to this spinning ball? Do you realize how ridiculous that sounds? Feathers and napkins can waft around in the wind, yet we're supposed to believe that the weakest force on Earth is holding all the oceans down? LOL.
    1
  33.  @julesdomes6064  Your inability to think for yourself is incredible. Lol. Again, I don't need your type of "credentials" to KNOW that I live on a level and motionless plane. My credentials are that I have common sense. Lol. If you actually work in the satellite industry then you may or may not know that satellites are actually sate-loons. They all go up on balloons (we have video footage of this), and many of them crash back down to Earth and are recovered. We literally have their wreckage (and videos) to prove this. If your job in the industry is to make a part for a satellite, then you obviously know nothing of the end result. You're just a cog in the wheel. Satellites can't track the alleged orbit of the Earth. There's no way. We are supposed to be spinning at 1000mph at the equator. You think that satellites are tracking that motion as we orbit the sun at 66,600 mph? ROFLMAO! Get real. What are they using for tracking? What is their mode of transportation to keep up with the spin? Do they have motors on them that are capable of going those ridiculous speeds? NASA is the number one consumer of helium. What do you think they're doing with all of that? Yep, they're using it deploy balloons with satellites attached to them. That's where some of our 70 million dollars a day goes to. LOL.
    1
  34.  @julesdomes6064  Um, I didn't run away. I was the last to reply to this thread.
    1
  35.  @julesdomes6064  Gravity is a BS unproven theory. It's the weakest "force" on Earth, yet you think it's capable of holding down all the oceans while feathers and plastic bags can fly around in the air with a good breeze? LOL.
    1
  36.  @julesdomes6064  You may want to check yourself. Gravity is a theory and not a law, like the law of electrostatic and electromagnetism. They are ten times greater than "gravity". 😉
    1
  37.  @julesdomes6064  I know you just want to keep grabbing to your balls. It's okay. LOL.
    1
  38.  @julesdomes6064  What a surprise that your channel has no content. It goes right alongside of you not having a leg to stand on when it comes to our Earth. LOL.
    1
  39.  @julesdomes6064  A "proven theory"? Oh really? And still you can't explain how tissues, plastic bags, and feathers can defy this supposed "gravity". LOL. 🤣
    1
  40.  @julesdomes6064 "Scientific" or not, it's still a theory. Perhaps you don't understand the definition of "theory". LOL. You can't replicate it here on any scale. Therefore your "theory" is just that. The science books even say that it's a theory and that it's the weakest force on Earth. LOL... You are stupid if you think that feathers can move around with the wind and yet "gravity" can hold trillions of tons of water to a spinning ball. 🤣
    1
  41.  @julesdomes6064 You're literally a useful idiot. LOL. You are defending your own prison. Congratulations. 🙄
    1
  42.  @julesdomes6064  A theory is a theory. It means it hasn't been proven. What is proven are the LAWS of buoyancy, density, electromagnetism, and electrical charges. We don't need nonsense like "dark matter" to support a law.
    1
  43.  @julesdomes6064  My videos don't make me an authority in science. It does mean that I'm brave enough to put myself out there rather than just making random comments. Lol.
    1
  44.  @julesdomes6064  You haven't debunked anything, dear. LOL. You're right that I shouldn't have bothered to say anything about your non-content channel. That has nothing to do with the subject of flat Earth. Neither you nor I are a certified "scientist". The difference between us is that I am able to think for myself while you regurgitate information that was drilled into your head. I guess you don't know the meaning of "theory". It doesn't matter whether it's a "scientific" theory or not. It's still unproven. It's a theory. That's the meaning of the word, for Pete's sake! LOL. I almost feel sorry for you at this point....
    1
  45. Have you ever seen the "planets" through a really good telescope or camera? They look nothing like the images NASA feeds us...
    1
  46. What a horrendous and sad occupation. 😔😢 Shawn is a wonderful nurse and human. God bless her and keep her safe so she can continue to help these poor kids. 🙏
    1
  47. They were called wandering stars well before public school systems came along.
    1
  48. Psychosis is believing you live on a water-covered spinning rocket ball. Lol.
    1
  49. You mean you're dumb? LOL.
    1
  50. You can't see that far because of the atmosphere and our limit of vision. The moon is small and local, so we can see features of it--though it's not a physical object.
    1