Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "BBC News" channel.

  1. Hey BBC, international news agencies are welcome to interview the people in Mariupol on the matter of who was killing civilians and destroying the buildings on purpose.
    143
  2. Removing comments will not cover the truth. If it's true, that there are still civilians in Azovstal, it means, that Azov is using them as human shield.
    39
  3. As they say, you can lie to some people all the time, or to all people for some time, but you can't lie to everyone all the time.
    28
  4. May no nazis ecsape among the civilians, they need to be punished.
    23
  5. Wrong, this was Ukrainian provocation. Just a fake to smear the Russians.
    18
  6. Your heart goes also to the nazis shown here?
    15
  7. Why is BBC recycling something, that Zelensky said like 5 days ago?
    13
  8. The fact, that there is BBC reporter on site proves, that the area is quite safe.😅
    12
  9. Short answer, yes. Long answer, definitely.
    11
  10. Dear BBC, true terror is, when well armed nazis of Azov battalion take cover in the city and use civilians as human shield.
    9
  11. So you also salute the nazis shown here?
    7
  12. They are going to switch to "Zela bad" narrative soon. Just a hunch.
    7
  13. And they will get their peace and independence, when the criminal Kiev regime is finally gone.
    6
  14.  @YuraK25  So you don't see the SS Totenkopf emblem on the soldiers shoulder? Are you not only dumb, but also blind? Wake up!
    6
  15. These people will shit their pants and get killed the second they enter the fight. This is a crime.
    6
  16.  @ahsbbsjsj2291  Yea, but he didn't change his mind about protecting the citizens of his country. He will gladly sacrifice them all.
    5
  17. Dear BBC, you have an opportunity to go to Mariupol and report the situation from there. That way you wouldn't have to repeat Ukrainian lies. This is shamefull reporting.
    5
  18. All Russian missiles hit strategic and military targets with high precision. Not like Ukrainian Tochka-U, which has been used mainly to kill civilians.
    5
  19. Dear BBC, doesn't it feel strange, that Russia could lose two thirds of their army present in Ukraine and still be able to continue pushing? Not strange at all? And what independence are we talking about? More than half of Ukraine land is owned by western corporations and the Kiev regime continues to exist only thanks to huge sums of money being funneled by the western countries. Where is the independence?
    5
  20. You are confused, it was Ukraine who brought it on themselves. With the help of their Murican owners of course.
    5
  21. The criminal Kiev regime never intended to negotiate, don't be silly.
    4
  22. They legally annexed it trough referendum. People who live there had a right to choose.
    4
  23.  @hithere9235  Russians don't have SS Totenkopf emblems on their shoulders, these Ukrainian nazis do! For the whole world to see and for stupid troll bots to deny.
    4
  24. Russians actually published a few videos with quite a lot of surrendering soldiers and quite a few interviews for identification of the captured troops. Their claims are as always solid as a rock.
    4
  25. He doesn't do that, he destroys nazis like the ones shown here.
    3
  26. So you are glorifying Ukrainian war crimes?
    3
  27. Fact: Most of these guys never fired Javeline or any other missile in their life. They have no experience and will most likely die without even seeing the enemy once.
    3
  28. Dear BBC, Crimea is a part of Russian Federation, why don't you drop the act?
    3
  29. Nope, only your money goes to Ukraine.
    3
  30.  @gordonstrong5232  But it IS a crime to give totally untrained civilians guns and send them into combat instead of evacuating them from combat zone!
    3
  31. BBC is spreading Ukrainian fakes and provocations. All the information and evidence of such behavior on Ukrainian side has already been presented to the UN committee by Mr. Nebenya, Russian diplomat at UN.
    2
  32. BBC can't be called news anymore, it's just BBC cloaca.
    2
  33. BBC continues to spread lies in their usual fashion. Those pasports were not confiscated, many people recieved Russian citizenship and didn't need those any more. Thousands of people fled to escape the renewed Ukronazi rule, to save their lives.
    2
  34. Lying won't help, you can give it up now. Start telling people what is really happening.
    2
  35.  @kwadrupol2809  And Ukraine doesn't have to be punished for all those murders of their own people?
    2
  36.  @wf6951  Of course, it's basically point and shoot, even a chimpanzee can do that. The point is, what will the chimpanzee do after the first barrage of artillery fire comes in, bodies go flying and he hears the clanking of armor coming at him for the first time in his life.
    2
  37.  @renatodemavibas3367  And they are doing it by commiting war crimes. Wake up.
    2
  38.  @hithere9235  Ahh so we are remembering other conflicts and reasons for war? So tell me, dear Rob, how do you feel about such terms as "interests of national security", "preventive strike", "Shock and Awe" and "Mission Accomplished"? Do you know, where these terms originate? And how many people died, killed by foreign soldiers in their own country? Do you know about any sanctions against those murderers or any global reaction at all? And did you cheer for the murderers, or cry for the victims? Tell me please, tell us all. And then tell me, where do you think these assholed in this video are hiding with the reporter? Does it look like military instalation, or someones residence? Go on, I'm all ears.
    2
  39.  @renatodemavibas3367  There are tons of videos of Ukrainian people telling the truth about what is going on in Mariupol. Even the UN committee in Ukraine has been already told by them, so in a few days it will maybe seep even into the totally censored western media. Russians are documenting everything quite extensively, preponderance of evidence is astounding. Wake up now, so you don't have to be ashamed of yourself even more later.
    2
  40. Of course there is, other side reports about the conflict are surprisingly factual, less biased and censored that this trash. Seriously.
    2
  41.  @willtellall638  It's called consumer mentality. Much like herd mentality.
    2
  42. Ah, you narrative quality controllers crack me up 🤣
    2
  43. Yep, that's Arestovych all right.
    2
  44.  @TheCroupier74  Eh...translation maybe? Just maybe?
    2
  45.  @rhysshaughnessy4757  Fighting crime with more crimes? Yea, makes sense... to a complete moron!
    2
  46.  @gordonstrong5232  It is a direct violation of international laws, therefore the Ukrainian Government is no better than the Russian, they are all criminals. There's no way around it, no matter how hard you spin it. Zelensky is a war criminal now.
    2
  47.  @ghfhchbtbb  Nope, it's just a fact. Grow up. Stop being a tool.
    2
  48. I do: Lies!
    2
  49. If the ship was hit by a missile, Russian would have reported it. And if Ukraine launched that missile, I'm sure they would have RECORDED it. And the story about retaliation is also Ukrainian BS, as Russians did missile attacks almost EVERY DAY FOR THE LAST MONTH. But you didn't hear about them, as all Russian missiles hit strategic targets.
    1
  50. Don't worry, Putin already ordered to highly reward all the heroes fighting the nazis.
    1
  51. Yes, the criminal Kiev regime must fall, for the future of all Ukrainian children.
    1
  52. Yes, Russians did a landing operation in Azovstal all right, the landing of a few FAB 3000 on the heads of the nazis😂
    1
  53.  @kublakhan1334  Any reporter can now go to Mariupol, it's safe when the Ukrainian nazis are not around. Some reporters have already done so.
    1
  54. Ukrainians are just a cheap labor for Germany, stop lying.
    1
  55. Dear BBC, how do you explain, that none of those civilians supposedly present in Azovstal has been released by the Ukrainian nazis? Why don't you correctly label this as the use of human shield?
    1
  56. Gullible much?
    1
  57.  @utubesuckbad  Only nazis consider others sub human.
    1
  58. Nazis didn't surrender their armor as agreed. It's just another nazi lie.
    1
  59. That's quite normal among those nazis.
    1
  60.  @stradglider  Hey, do you even realize this was all just for show? This is not real fight! Also, you ask who cares about the symbol of Hitlers elite murder squad?????????????????????? SERIOUSLY?????????????????????????
    1
  61. BBC competing in "The best lie about Ukraine" semi finals and so far it seems they will go to final round.
    1
  62. Another piece of evidence against Ukrainian army taking positions in residential areas and putting civilians in danger. Wonder why they still cry about civilian losses, when they use such criminal tactics.
    1
  63. Dear BBC, nazis in Azovstal were asked practically every day for the last week to release the civilians, yet they did so only after UN pushed the clowns buttons. And the nazis still keep holding many more civilians hostage, playing for time, and releasing just small groups. Call them terrorists, because that's what they are.
    1
  64. Ukraine wins battles that never happened, liberates empty villages and counterattacks in Twitter. Slava cocaini.
    1
  65. You find it great, that Ukraine is being destroyed and people die?🤮
    1
  66. What questions? Ukraine evidently uses those missiles quite regularly, Russia doesn't and no evidence exists to the contrary.
    1
  67.  @Jonnnie  Evidence? Link?
    1
  68.  @LuXAuroraAeterna  Where, when, evidence, investigation, links?
    1
  69.  @G1NZOU  Russia doesn't use them and if you want to claim they do, you should present evidence.
    1
  70. At 6:05 you can hear BBC CONFIRMING, WHO PLACES ALL THOSE MINES. Those are then blamed on Russia EVERY time.
    1
  71.  @whitelutik  The people in Crimea don't need anyone else to recognize their decision, so that's good enough, chum.
    1
  72.  B F  I can see that.
    1
  73.  @mrwong8584  Russia is quite independent already, it may have escaped your attention, just like basically everything about this conflict. Poor you.
    1
  74.  @foolish-808  Follow your own advice.
    1
  75.  @jorgealves8578  That is so stupid, that even Youtube refuses to show it publicly.
    1
  76. BBC estimated to be about 98% wrong about this.
    1
  77.  @canuckprogressive.3435  By anyone who knows, how are the Russian troops really doing and how often the Brits are lying. In other words, by anyone who isn't gullible idiot.
    1
  78. Smear campaign.
    1
  79. Keep wishing, write to Santa about it. smh
    1
  80. It's a known fact, that Russians evacuate any and all civilians from any area they take with troops. If Russians were there, all those people would be saved. But there were only Ukrainians. And any survivor from Mariupol can tell you, how Ukrainian army treats civilians.
    1
  81.  @hithere9235  I don't have to prove anything to you, by now it's well established fact. Not only did their governemnt announce they will never give up(war crime), but they placed their military units in residential areas( another war crime) and the soldiers literally murdered many of their own citizens. It's the Russians, who are risking their lives and repeatedly rescue civilians right from the combat zone in Mariupol, even if they didn't have to! Have some courage and face the truth, I can't do that for you!
    1
  82.  @renatodemavibas3367  First, wars happen, for any dumb reasons. Actually they happen all the time. Russians are attacking Ukraine military, but the problem is, that those assholed are hiding in cities. Stop repeating propaganda slogans and wake up.
    1
  83.  @ghostttriddder  US nazi supporter
    1
  84. Dear BBC, your reporting about Mariupol is far from factual and objective, you are literally lying to people.
    1
  85. Russian claims have evidence behind them. Very different from Ukrainian claims.
    1
  86. Now go to Doneck and show the world the bombed houses and streets, dead civilians and families living in fear because of the Ukrainian heavy artillery strikes. Those people have been under fire for YEARS, thousands have died, including many children. But that doesn't fit your narrative, so you just ignore it.
    1
  87. I don't see any shopping center being hit and I don't see those thousands of people, that were supposedly inside either. Number of victims confirms the Russian version too. The crater is NOT in the shopping center, but in the factory next to it. Also, there were two missiles, weren't there? Dear BBC, could you do me a favor and go fak yourselves?
    1
  88.  @lorsev3840  Yea, you get tortured and murdered instead. And there's more Putin critics in Russia than in any other country, you are just delusional.
    1
  89.  @Joe-ul3gh  You have destroyed my peritoneum, I'm still laughing. Why are you lying? Closed non-state back media? Which ones? And what reporter?
    1
  90.  @Joe-ul3gh  Who are you trying to fool here? Marina Ovsyannikova is prosecuted for spreading LIES and is facing up to 15 years, not 10. Dozhd is basically Ukropropaganda channel spreading LIES and is still available online. There are many privately owned TV channels in Russia, so stop spreading LIES.
    1
  91. NATO supplied weapons already falling into Russian hands. Happy now, morons? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alhl589Mhwg
    1
  92. Slava cocaini.
    1
  93. 🤣🤣🤣😂😅
    1
  94. The Ukrainian armed forces are hated everywhere they ever set foot.
    1
  95. At 6:05 you can hear BBC CONFIRMING, WHO PLACES ALL THOSE MINES. Those are then blamed on Russia EVERY time.
    1
  96. What tyrants? Delusional much?
    1
  97. BBC still pandering the propaganda, not a word about the inhuman crimes of Ukrainian army, that are being uncovered every day.
    1
  98. Why should anyone pay attention to what a bunch of liars and criminals have to say about anything?
    1
  99. They won't, everyone knows it, even Russians.
    1
  100. So it was the Russians, because the Ukrainians say so. And BBC is taking their word for it without any evidence. Good job BBC, good bye honest reporting.
    1
  101.  Andy Mills  Your comment reveals an intention to manipulate and twist the facts. The lie about cossacks is hilarious, my own ancestors came from Zaporozhie, so I know for a fact that you're shamelessly pulling this out of your ass. The skull and bones symbol seen in this video is very close, if not exact, replica of SS Tottenkopf. And the fact, that you call the Russians cockroaches, reveals that you have no problem with nazi ideology also. Take a hike, nazi sympathizer.
    1
  102.  @galatheumbreon6862  Intimidation of who? Maybe Ukrainian civilians got intimidated, but it doesn't work on Russians, it even has the opposite effect :D.
    1
  103.  @questionmaker5666  Where do I say they are all nazis? Those wearing such symbolism, be it on uniforms, or on their bodies as a tattoos, those are the ones. The rest are just simple war criminals, if they take positions in residential areas. And as we can see from all the footage available, almost all of them do that. Edit: And those, who don't object to such things, are complicit as well.
    1
  104.  @questionmaker5666  Russia can't simply leave, that would solve nothing and all the deaths would be in vain. Show me evidence of Russians targetting undefended area, such extraordinary claim requires extraordinary evidence. You really think, that Russians will waste ammunition on such insignificant targets, just to gain nothing at all? When they come to undefended area, they just check for hidden fighters and traps and move on without firing a single shot. Everything is documented extensively, if you weren't consuming exclusively the western propaganda, you would know that by now.
    1
  105.  @celebrim1  What you say about Kharkiv may be true, but these rules of engagement are specifically aimed at minimalization of damage to non military infrastructure and loss of lives of civilians. And surely you have evidence, that Ukraine government and military did all they could to avoid placing military units in residential areas before all civilians were evacuated, do you? Because vast majority of reports shows otherwise. For example in Mariupol. Also, about that "volunteering" - you simply can't let civilians engage in combat with the enemy army, not even if they volunteer. IHL specifically prohibits this. It's the military job to keep them safe and out of the combat zone. This is obviously not being done on Ukrainian side, but it is done qwuite meticulously on the Russian side, if the are given any chance of doing so. And lastly, present evidence of your "knowledge" about Russians targeting areas with no military targets and the "terror shelling". The evidence should include clear identification of the perpetrators and exclude any possibility of it being another of many Ukrainian provocations and fakes. The Russian UN diplomat Nebenzya already presented evidence of such behavior on Ukrainian side to the UN. And here are some examples, how this rule has been implemented in conflicts: Article 58 of the 1977 Additional Protocol I states that the parties to the conflict shall, to the maximum extent feasible “avoid locating military objectives within or near densely populated areas” Article 3 of the 1996 Israel-Lebanon Ceasefire Understanding states that the two parties commit to ensuring that “civilian populated areas and industrial and electrical installations will not be used as launching grounds for attacks”. Article 11 of the 1956 New Delhi Draft Rules states: “[T]he Parties to the conflict shall, so far as possible, avoid the permanent presence of armed forces, military material, mobile military establishments or installations, in towns or other places with a large civilian population.”
    1
  106.  @celebrim1  And as for those alleged attacks on evacuating civilians( for which there's not a shread of evidence), maybe you don't know about all the footage of Russians stopping all men and checking them for nazi tattoos or any signs of wearing military gear. Those who are clear, are all allowed to continue evacuating. This blows you stupid claims right out of the water. You need to do better than that.
    1
  107.  @celebrim1  Looks like you have been misinformed about Mariupol a lot. If you say you are watching both sides, why then didn't you know about the body checks? Someone is lying here, isn't he? You also obviously don't know about all the witnesses speaking about the situation in town. Or Russian soldiers evacuating civilians under fire in their BTRs. Ommiting much? And Mariupol was heavily pro-russian in the past, that's why Azov made it their main base of operations. But never mind that, I don't intend to waste any more time with someone, who is not completely honest with me. Let's leave it on the tribunal, where all evidence will be presented. Russians have plenty of that, but I doubt Ukrainians have anything substantial to support their claims.
    1
  108.  @celebrim1  As I said, leave it to the tribunal. I'm quite sure Russians do some of those videos for propaganda, but you can hardly fake hundreds of cars and thousands of people evacuating Mariupol under Russian protection or witness accounts of thousands of people. And if you say they can, you are simply a fool. Those accounts have been reportedly presented to the UN committee members in Ukraine and as I said before, evidence has been presented at the UN by Russian diplomats. BTW I have also seen interviews where people were not supportive to Russians at all, why would they publish those, if the do it for propaganda? Again, you are clearly dishonest, even if you try to act unbiased. And the many Ukrainian provocations, fakes and obvious smear campaign against the Russians also completely escapes your attention. Bad attitude, not worth my time.
    1
  109.  @gordonstrong5232  Doesn't matter, if the government allows them to fight, it's a crime. I already stated that, dumb much? And please, where exactly and how do I defend the Russian invasion? I hope you stretched your rectum, because right now i'm tearing you a new one. Are you advocating for war crimes by suggesting it's the right thing to engage civilians in a war?
    1
  110. Comparison of war crimes perpetrated by both sides of the conflict: Attacks against civilian targets - Russia- many(alleged, documented) Ukraine- many (alleged, documented) Use of civilians for combat- Russia- zero Ukraine- many(well documented) Parading prisoners of war/ publicly using them for propaganda- Russia- zero Ukraine- many(well documented)
    1
  111.  @blowbert9126  So when someone attacks you, it is all right for you to commit war crimes? This looks like advocating for war crimes, which is a criminal offence in most countries.
    1
  112.  @blowbert9126  Even allowing them to fight, when there's military to do the job, is a war crime. Reported for advocating war crimes.
    1
  113.  @blowbert9126  And according to Zelensky it's a war, so your whole argument goes down the drain. Homeguard militia can't be formed of untrained women and old people, who are just given guns. Try something better, maybe try using brain, if you have any left.
    1
  114.  @blowbert9126  Reported again for advocating war crimes.
    1
  115. Ah yes, the mythical counter offensive at Kherson, it already became a running joke. But BBC doesn't care about damaging their credibility, because they have none already.
    1
  116. It's even more sad, that it is totally fabricated story. Well, except the dead, killed by Ukronazis.
    1
  117.  @LennertTale  What the hell is wrong with you? Russians and Ukrainians, brothers are losing their lives, and you care about this?
    1
  118. And now all the investments turn to ashes and the plan is failing. Russians take no sht from Muricans.
    1
  119. What about those millions of Ukrainians who left the country and don't seem to want to ever return? Misdirection much?
    1
  120. Murdered by SBU and Ukronazis.
    1
  121. Towns can be rebuilt, but nazism MUST be destroyed.
    1