Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "Curious Droid" channel.

  1. Talk about confirmation bias when this whole video is made from a standpoint of someone who firmly believes that the moonlandings were real and that there is absolutely no problem with the evidence provided by NASA. It doesn't adress any real issues, because it's just some crazy moonhoaxers with their crazy ideas, there's no such thing like various people actually studying the materials and finding clear evidence of fakery, no no no it's all just crazy moonhoaxers, believing some crazy ideas of other loons. Nothing to see here, move along, right? Nice propaganda, great job.
    1
  2. So, did you study the evidence yourself? All of it? I did, and it made me change my view on moonlandings, I do not accept such evidence as conclusive, not by far. "moonlanding deniers always come with the same stuff that is only based on ignorance and lack of knowledge that was debunked countless times" That is simply not true. Some of the claims can be verified by anyone, for example Make believe enhanced series, no debunking ever, just more or less confirmations of the findings. Or the sounds recorded by the spacesuit microphone, many times, no debunking ever. Or the flag waving due to astronauts movements around it- just a poor attemps to debunk that. "basically all hoax claims were never taken seriously by the people who published them" - You really mean that? I'm sorry, but that's just stupid.
    1
  3. More specific? Can't you use the search engine? Several people have found that noises from the outside were picked up by the spacesuits microphones. It's from original NASA footage and it can be easily verified. Example here watch?v=w5O43FkzYZc . On the creators channel you can also find Make believe enhanced series, so you don't have to search for it. Is that specific enough? About the flag- it was stationary and started moving due to fast movements of the astronauts nearby. And not just once. The electrostatic effect was never observed in any mission footage, flag never reacts to astronauts standing or moving slowly nearby, movement of the flag is perfectly compatible with air disturbance. But it's clear now that you didn't study the evidence, so you better do it before you start defending the propaganda.
    1
  4. Now you started babbling like Asholebrat...err I mean Astrobrant. Some noises? So the sound travelling in vacuum and being picked by the suit microphone is perfectly normal. I see. More consistent? What are you babbling about? What many footages with moving flag? I know only about two and there's no substantial dust kicking. And you don't mention the Make believe series, why is it? Just denying everything doesn't make you right,it just makes you totally tarded.
    1
  5. Well, I'm not discussing anything with a pre-programmed troll. I met a few, so I know how it goes. As you said yourself, you don't have time and don't bother about any evidence I could come up with. Sound in a vacuum,that's just some sort of "anomaly" right? It is nothing. Keep on trolling, I'm laughing.
    1
  6. "Clearly, if the USSR had evidence to the contrary why would they not use it?"- It's called politics, truth holds little value in politics, don't you know? "This leads to 2 possible conclusions."- And this is called false dichotomy, please don't try this stupid shit on me. Why did you even reply to my comments?
    1
  7. Well, where do you say there are any other possible conclusions? Where do you explain how you even came to these two "possible" conclusions? Based on what? What you wrote is clearly a manipulative statement. Why don't the secret services of those countries divulge all sensitive informations on each other? Why don't they? Try using your brain instead of namecalling. Why didn't any well reputed scientist come with an analysis of the footage, showing the obvious errors? Try getting such an analysis peer rewieved, see what happens. The US government has a long history of false flag and covert operations around the world, many of them are now a part of documented history. Well, at least those declassified ones or the ones that failed and were beyond plausible deniability. Until someone else is able to recreate the feat, that was routinely achieved by NASA 50 years ago, there's no reason to believe it was real. Where's the progress? Why the regression? Fifty fuckin years!
    1
  8. No need to apologize, as I don't feel offended at all. And I am perfectly aware what site this is. What you call playful nonacademic response I call purely speculative questions, presented in a rather manipulative way. I couldn't answer such questions without entering into speculations myself. That's why I reacted so harshly, it simply looked like another trolling attemp, which I'm used to deal with on regular basis on this site. I'm more than willing to discuss any facts, but the only fact I see in your response is that the Russians decided to play along and there's no telling what they really know and why they acted like this, so there's no point in asking me about this. Simple as that.
    1