Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1. You mean stronger than in 2022 during Istanbul talks? Good luck with that.
    38
  2. Yea, that band wagon is emptying quickly. Only the most deluded still stay.
    34
  3.  @tuehojbjerg969  The problem with that is, that it's a complete lie.
    30
  4. Yes, Ukraine roleplaying the Third reich is a tragic comedy.
    26
  5. It's worse in Russia how exactly? Spare no detail please.
    24
  6. It's not dependence, it's subjugation.
    24
  7. Quality cope, keep it up.
    23
  8. So confirmation bias is the right thing for you, is that what you are saying?
    22
  9. After the deployment of Denazifier 1500 it became clear, that no fortification can hold for long. And Russia is already preparing Denazifier 3000 for deployment. It has double denazification power plus a huge emotional damage as a bonus.
    21
  10.  @marviwilson1853  You know what destroyed means, don't you? You know there is a big differene between destroyed and damaged, don't you? So, which refinery was destroyed and when? Or were they maybe just damaged?
    16
  11. Yes, do not think about it, just go with what you wanted to hear. Really smart.
    16
  12. So according to Puck's own reasoning it's normal that Russia lost some territory while defending Kursk and it in no way means that UA forces are winning in any way there, as Russians concentrated on causing maximum losses to AFU instead of holding territory at all costs. Isn't it ironic, Puck?
    14
  13. What part exactly is a failure? Any examples?
    14
  14. No worries little banderite, they will get you too.
    14
  15. Russia doesn't need mobilisation, because they get about 30k volunteers a month. Which coincidentally is a number of UA monthly losses, while the number of volunteers is basically zero and people are getting beaten and kidnapped in the streets. Can you cope any harder?
    14
  16. It never was. Quite the opposite.
    14
  17. Good luck with that.
    13
  18. Good luck with that.😄
    13
  19. It really isn't. It's just a copium dispenser.
    13
  20. No, he doesn't. And he isn't.
    13
  21. He didn't explain it, he just lied about it, c'mon.
    13
  22. Europe doesn't need to defend against Russia, doesn't have to since 1991.
    13
  23.  @AndrewBlucher  Facts? Which ones? 1. Source missing, dismissed. 2. Source missing, dismissed. Only reservists recieved summons, not all of them were admitted for service. 3. Irrelevant, not factual, dismissed. 4. Conjecture, dismissed. In summation, very poor. Typical Puck fan.
    12
  24. What a strange understanding of the word "credible".
    12
  25. Seethe and cope.
    12
  26. Facts? Which ones?
    11
  27. The reality of Ukraine losing and european economy taking a dive.
    11
  28. "already shambling logistics" - What exactly do you mean? There are zero reports concerning problems with logistic.
    11
  29. "the Soviet Union repaid $722 million in 1971, with the remainder of the debt written off." - I found an information which directly contradicts your claim. Care to explain?
    11
  30.  @marviwilson1853  Destroyed refinery? Which one? When?
    11
  31.  @terjeoseberg990  Sorry, not interested in NAFO silly talking points. Ukraine is losing badly and that's a fact.
    10
  32.  @jesan733  So someone who writes many comments is somehow "immersed in ru disinfo"? How does that work and what does it even mean?
    10
  33. If you have FAB 3000, no fortifications matter in the slightest.
    10
  34. Sure you are. Salo Uronili!
    9
  35. Meanwhile the current Russian level of losses is lowest since the start of the conflict.
    9
  36.  @bhaashatepe5234  You'll never get a honest answer here, not from these Ukrobots.
    9
  37. Citing Brainrot McDoublechin is the saddest thing I saw this year.
    9
  38. And he was exactly right. Are you joking?
    9
  39. Ask Ukrainians who fled the country how motivated they are.
    8
  40. Sure, anonymous sources, whatever. My own anonymous sources tell me that Russia was always willing to negotiate, but currently there is noone to negotiate with, as NATO seeks only escalation and Ukrainians pay the price. I have noticed how Puck tried to spin the Russian objectives, also he uses the term "war" despite there de facto and de iure not being one. Puck never disappoints, his copium is pure and undiluted.
    8
  41. Russia is also outproducing Europe by incomparable margin. And that's what matters here, not your weak cope points.
    8
  42.  @lennyztrobos8678  It's like saying any military action will use up more ammunition. What a clever example, bravo.
    8
  43. The whole thing is based on a documentary about study/recreational opportunities for children from Donbass, it is available online. There were never any abductions, all the children went of their own volition and returned safely home.
    8
  44. Food is cheap and plentiful in Russia. Next!
    8
  45.  @marviwilson1853  You mentioned a destroyed refinery, so I was curious. I don't see anything wrong with that. Looks like you used the word just for dramatic effect, as the attacks were in fact pretty pathetic and the refineries will be repaired shortly, if not already.
    8
  46. Cope harder.
    8
  47. Neither does Puck. And you too.
    7
  48. Much less that Ukruine.
    7
  49. Exactly zero. While in Ukraine it's thousand a day.
    7
  50.  @dpelpal  No, you didn't. Are you a child?
    7