Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1.  @PerB_M  Oh please, tell me the real reason for the "raid", apart from making a short video. I'm all ears.
    1
  2.  @PerB_M  In other words, there was no other reason, thank you for confirmation.
    1
  3. Yea, Puck is a joke.
    1
  4.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  The only thing the development showed is that Ukruine never stood a chance. Just get over it already.
    1
  5.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  UA failed to achieve its goal of pushing RF out and there is zero chance of it still happening somehow. Meanwhile RF is steadily nearing their goals, which is demilitarization and denazification. It's a steady trend, where at no point it was even remotely possible for Ukraine to push RF out completely. So how do you think Ukraine can win? Wait, I forgot who I'm talking to, you don't think at all, so you don't have to answer that question.
    1
  6.  @maiku20  Arguing with Ukrobots can be fun for a while, then it quickly gets boring, as they regurgitate the same lies over and over again. Been there, done that.😆
    1
  7.  @Aaaaaaaaaaaaaa-qx3fc  I can agree with that.
    1
  8.  @toby9999  It was in fact completely legal according to international law and UN charter, plain and simple.
    1
  9. lol
    1
  10. 😄
    1
  11.  @mariaf.6601  Former eastern okraine.
    1
  12.  @mariaf.6601  I said former. Apologize for your ignorance and scuttle away.
    1
  13. If the fishes lived in people's behinds, we wouldn't need ponds. Old saying.
    1
  14. I like how the number keeps changing and how so many cretins take a twitter post as an actual evidence of anything.
    1
  15. Bombing cities full of people with aviation, heavy artillery and missiles is a defensive position? Since when?
    1
  16.  @dduarmand6972  I'm talking about 2014 and Ukrainian ATO, when they bombed their own citizens in Donbass just because they opposed unconstitutional coup.
    1
  17.  @tallshort1849  Nope, they pretty much agree.
    1
  18.  @WewasAtamans  It's by far not the first time we see Ukrainian hits on NATO territory being presented as Russian. It's kinda funny they are still trying.
    1
  19.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  Then everything is over, charges are dropped and Wagner moves to Belarus, making Belarus "freedom fighters" instantly sh!t their pants. And Ukrobots keep oinking about how terrible it is for Russia.🤣🤣🤣
    1
  20. What a sad, deluded Murican.
    1
  21.  @RandallBurt-u1w  Well said.
    1
  22.  @krakhedd  Sure, sure, so if Russia decides to block the ports, Turkey will rush in and deblocade them, right?🤣
    1
  23.  @wai828  Ah, that's why the west had to persuade Russia to let the grain be exported from those ports, right? Because Russia was unable to block those ports, right? 😅
    1
  24.  @krakhedd  Maybe instead of developing your paranoid theories, you might react to my question, what you say? Counter some disinformation with your zero tolerance, boy.
    1
  25.  @jaysonkmendoza  That is a very strange definition of a blockade, because as I understand it, to block a port, you need to simply have the ability to sink any ship leaving the port, which Russians certainly have. Care to explain, why they would have to move and sit before the port? Also, are you saying, that the Russian fleet operates exclusively out of range of those fabled missiles? Any evidence for that? Because Neptun can basically reach almost to Sevastopol. If Ukraine even has any, that is.
    1
  26.  @jaysonkmendoza  First off, Moskva was definitely NOT designated anti-missile and air defence cruiser, what are you talking about? It was a missile cruiser, it carried guided missiles. Second, why would they need ships at all, when they have perfectly functional aircrafts with missiles more than able to hit any ship from a safe distance? What exactly would prevent them to destroy any ship leaving the port? And where is the evidence of Russian fleet operating only close to Crimea? You did not provide any, even after I explicitly asked for it.
    1
  27.  @jaysonkmendoza  So, you were wrong about Moskva, but you are too dishonest to admit it. You also have no answer to how would anyone prevent Russia from destroying any ship leaving the port by launching missiles from the air hundreds of miles away from any counter measures, so you started babbling about Turkey, NATO and a "great cost" as ambiguously as you are able. And you ignored my repeated request for evidence to your claim, so that is enough for me, I have no reason to continue conversation with such a dishonest person.
    1
  28.  @wai828  Did I say ships can teleport? And you did not answer my question. Why Russia had to take an active part in the grain deal, if they, as you claim, couldn't do anything about it anyway? Their fleet is hiding behind Crimea based on what evidence? And can you specify the "last time they tried to be aggressive in the Black Sea they lost their flag ship, the Moskva" part? As a matter of fact, Russians regularly lauched their rockets from ships in the Black sea and still are. And Moskva sunk after a fire exploded some stored ammunition.
    1
  29. Too bad he just pulls things out of his ass, it has nothing to do with reality.
    1
  30. lol
    1
  31. Maybe read the Russian nuclear doctrine before you embarrass yourself some more.
    1
  32.  @jackaroo2327  In short, nuclear weapons are used if the EXISTENCE of RF is endangered. Banderites are very far away from that. They are just a nuisance.
    1
  33.  @Shoelessjoe78  Who has such objectives? Because it certainly isn't Russia.
    1
  34. Democratic leader?🤣
    1
  35. That is utterly false, only applies when the two sides are equally strong.
    1
  36.  @mariaf.6601  Reported.
    1
  37. Ukronazi propaganda is funny sometimes.
    1
  38. We can already see that the "strategic bombing" has already ended, last hit was two weeks ago. And while RF suffered minor damage, UA in turn lost several power plants. Puck is clearly wrong as usual.
    1
  39.  @mariaf.6601  Manipulative question, NAFO bot detected, reported as spam and harrassment.
    1
  40.  @mariaf.6601  "I agree, the Kiev regime should be punished harshly for their involvement." - YT censored my reply.
    1
  41.  @mariaf.6601  Go ask Russians for it, bottie.
    1
  42.  @nigelgarrett7970  I don't think you know what "de facto" means. The alternative is far worse.
    1
  43. The only scary thing about it is how many Ukrainians died in those four months.
    1
  44. Nah, it's this guy.
    1
  45. It's kinda nuts that people believe this kind of BS coming from Ukrainian coke clowns.
    1
  46.  @tuehojbjerg969  Which ones? I found not a single word about anything like this on any Russian channel.
    1
  47.  @tuehojbjerg969  Still waiting for those sources.
    1
  48.  @ABCBCNM  🤣🤣🤣🤣
    1
  49.  @bigbadlara5304  Ukrainian men are literally being hunted on the streets and forcibly consripted. Dozens or more like hundreds of videos show this to be a reality.
    1
  50.  @marianoaugustoormadtejejer5663  Because it's true and he means exactly what he wrote.
    1