Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1.  @mariaf.6601  Reported.
    2
  2. Which part was clear and reasoned? I somehow missed it altogether.
    2
  3.  @st-ex8506  More like nobody can't point that out.😅
    2
  4.  @lelolson3373  Not nearly as big as we are led to believe by Puck and all the other western propagandists.
    2
  5. And still beating banderites.
    2
  6. The annual conscripts are not being sent to Ukraine.
    2
  7. Hope you don't expect Puck to be objective in his "analysis".😆
    2
  8. I like how excited Puckie is when he pulls nonsensical stories out of his behind. Meat waves, huge losses, sure buddy, the problem is that there is no evidence, those are completely baseless claims.
    2
  9. If I was his superior and he came with such "analysis", I would fire him on the spot for incompetence and possible drug abuse.
    2
  10.  @wyskass861  How is that relevant to the topic? Try again.
    2
  11. Looking forward to Puck trying to spin the loss of Avdeevka as UA success and label the position of encircled UA soldiers as "luxurious".😆
    2
  12. After three minute mark Puck talks about damage, but for some inexplicable reason he doesn't talk about Ukronazis shelling the dam on purpose and boasting about it last year. For this "expert" it "looks like explosion inside the dam" and he provides no reasoning for this conclusion. Puck also doesn't talk about Kiev sending record ammounts of water from upstream dams before the disaster. The rest of the video is just desperate attempt to confirm the ridiculous narrative about Russia supposedly blowing the dam. As usual, total incompetence and dishonesty on full display.
    2
  13.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  The video is clearly only about how Russia did it. Your reaction seems irrelevant and dishonest, as the shelling was also purposefully aimed at the sluice gates, but of course for people with selective memory this may be a surprising information. Also- with other dams up the stream you can regulate the river to utmost extremes, go educate yourself, read a book or something and stop embarrasing yourself like this. smh
    2
  14. He does it for money.
    2
  15. Large amounts of copium.
    2
  16.  @mariaf.6601  But he's not talking about any Russians, he's talking about Ukrainian nationalists. It was them who coined these slogans, noone else. It definitely is a "party salutation" and the only possible paralel to be drawn here is with Hitler's Germany. Ukrainian nationalists not only imitated their German counterparts, they outright joined them. There's a billboard in Lviv showing SS Galizien sign along with a photo of SS soldiers with a text saying ""Yesterday's them are today's you". What a surprise, right?
    2
  17.  @mariaf.6601  To confirm what? It's common knowledge. The billboard is all over tg, but it's enough to google it as there's already a post on Reddit about it. No point denying it. Edit: I'm really curious how will you wriggle out of this one. My bet is you'll just run away as always and pretend nothing happened.
    2
  18.  @ArchOfficial  They can access tg, no censorship there like on YT.
    2
  19.  @thegreatdane3627  That's a good one, thanks for the laugh.
    2
  20. Turns out it's not a minority at all, cope and seethe.
    2
  21.  @jesan733  You did not address the content of my posts in the slightest, you only mentioned the amount. You also did not present an example of the supposed "Ru disinfo", so your argument falls far short of being considered valid in any way.
    2
  22. "several indications Russia may be behind at least some of this" - That means there is zero evidence and Puck just assumes it. "Russian drones have violated the airspace of NATO contries" - Here Puckie left out the most important word - allegedly. With, again, zero evidence. The reason NATO doesn't react is exactly because it's all assumptions and allegations. Puck trying to spin it like some real Russian provocations is beyond hilarious.
    2
  23.  @vipulgupta  Dude, Puck just said Ukraine is doing fine on defensive and the front is not collapsing, while in reality the front moves every day, but never in Ukraine favor. And you find that not biased.
    2
  24. Names the video Opposition politics in Russia, interviews a failed politician living in Israel. I lost interest at the point where Katz blabbers about Lukashenko being a dictator and starts pulling some stale BS about elections, lying his ass off. But don't expect Puck to call Katz out on any of it, because that would actually be a honest action and Puck never does that. Terrible, as usual.
    2
  25. They tried to strike several times already, their bodies now litter the fields.
    2
  26. Zelensky lost face, what's worse.
    2
  27.  @martingizzlebizzle  Of course he did. Ask a Japanese or Chinese person if you don't believe me.
    2
  28.  @martingizzlebizzle  Ok, you obviously think a personal attack somehow passes for an argument. Bye.
    2
  29.  @rmdomainer9042  So you found it and it exists, but you are too ashamed to admit it, that is truly hilarious. 🤣 Oh my, what a sore loser. And the last strike on refinery was about two weeks ago, you surely like to paint the L on your forehead.
    2
  30. Ghost of Kiev says hi.
    2
  31. One year ago - "Three ways Ukraine can win"
    2
  32. That's because you are.
    2
  33. Looks like YT didn't like my reaction, so here it is again - in addition to the last point, there is a referendum and the whole country joins RF. Heads start spontaneously bursting in the US corporation.
    2
  34. Cope much much harder.
    2
  35. 8 years of pumping Ukraine with weapons and sending instructors to train their army to NATO standards was clearly not enough.
    2
  36.  @mariaf.6601  Any arguments?
    2
  37.  @Therakus  How many civilian was killed during those 36 days?
    2
  38.  @seancidy6008  Sure, whatever makes you cope better.
    2
  39. Believe it or not this is his normal modus operandi.
    2
  40. Trump simply admitted Russia's victory in Ukraine. And rightly so.
    2
  41. First lie in uder half a minute, that may be a new record for Puckie. The ICC arrest warrant is based on something completely different than genocide and the fact Puckie tries to make such a connection just shows how terribly dishonest and/or incompetent he is.
    2
  42.  @worfoz  The only joke here is Puck and his degenerate worshippers.
    2
  43.  @mariaf.6601  You are just proving your dishonesty. It is in fact you who scours comments on every Puck video, asking everyone dumb questions and arguing like a little child. Annoying Ukrofan.
    2
  44. Guys, Russia is collapsing again and running out of equipment. Isn't it hilarious?
    2
  45.  @renstein8210  Are you new to the channel? Puck never supports his claims with evidence, he just presents his opinions.
    2
  46.  @Tannhauser62  So the billions invested BEFORE the coup, American politicians flashing smiles at the protests and the Nuland phone call is flimsy evidence? Like, seriously?
    2
  47.  @lancehilt7536  You are talking to NAFO bot, I hope you realise that. Notice he isn't adressing any of the points you made.
    2
  48.  @claus-not-santa  He does.
    2
  49.  @claus-not-santa  He also never writes his own comment to the video, he just pesters critical posts with silly replies and tries to engage in conversation. Simple minded Polish troll.
    2
  50. Just saying something is unrealistic doesn't really make it unrealistic. The new parts of RF will stay that way, that is a stone cold certainty. It can only go worse for Ukraine from there.
    2