General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Anders Puck Nielsen
comments
Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "Time for a new Ukrainian offensive?" video.
"the Soviet Union repaid $722 million in 1971, with the remainder of the debt written off." - I found an information which directly contradicts your claim. Care to explain?
11
Ukraine is winning so hard, that even Zelensky started talking about negotiations. Let's talk about it.🤭
7
@helgeschneider9069 Even if that is true, OP is still wrong, so thanks for confirmation.
6
What a marvelous false dichotomy, bravo!
6
@anderspuck Does being wrong most of the time help your carreer as an military analyst?
5
@qbi4614 Not a single American voter will in any way be voting for "the people of Ukraine". Get real.
5
@chefchaudard3580 Exactly, Puck did not present any evidence to base his reasoning on, so no evidence is needed to dismiss it. Anything else?
4
@balaclavabob001 They don't.
2
@mariaf.6601 But he's not talking about any Russians, he's talking about Ukrainian nationalists. It was them who coined these slogans, noone else. It definitely is a "party salutation" and the only possible paralel to be drawn here is with Hitler's Germany. Ukrainian nationalists not only imitated their German counterparts, they outright joined them. There's a billboard in Lviv showing SS Galizien sign along with a photo of SS soldiers with a text saying ""Yesterday's them are today's you". What a surprise, right?
2
@mariaf.6601 To confirm what? It's common knowledge. The billboard is all over tg, but it's enough to google it as there's already a post on Reddit about it. No point denying it. Edit: I'm really curious how will you wriggle out of this one. My bet is you'll just run away as always and pretend nothing happened.
2
@helgeschneider9069 That's what comes out when you ask google if Russia repaid WW2 lend lease debt. Whether it's correct or not is however not the point here. You've been told already and yet you still keep going how I was wrong. Incredible.
2
@balaclavabob001 So Zelensky and Kuleba are a part of Russian troll farms? Seriously?
2
"I guess this is the most ridiculous and unrealistic opinion I've heard from Puck so far. Steiner's counter offensive revisited. "If Biden gets reelected" - This part alone shows how bad Puck really is as an analyst. Even the most hard core Ukros who jumped at Maidan with pots on their heads now realise how bad it is, soldiers know it for quite some time already. Russians will continue pushing and Ukraine will continue losing. Abandon your dreams of any Ukro large scale counter offensive, it's simply not happening." Youtube censorship got worse lately.
2
@HeadsFullOfEyeballs So because your name is HeadsFullOfEyeballs, you are pretending to have head full of eyeballs? Are you even serious? And anyone who can read body language will basically confirm Puck is not being honest, it's clear as a day he's forcing himself to push this ridiculous narrative which not even he himslef believes.
2
@HeadsFullOfEyeballs Ah, it's the "he's pretending to be of anglo heritage" guy. You better just hide in the corner and think about what you did.
1
@RandallBurt-u1w Well said.
1
@chefchaudard3580 Oh yes, we need evidence from Puck.
1
@mariaf.6601 It's his opinion, learn to respect other people's opinions. Reported for harrassment.
1
@mariaf.6601 Whataboutism much? Stay on topic. Reported.
1
@mariaf.6601 But the information he gave is 100% accurate and you presented nothing to invalidate it. You just keep harrassing commentators with your lies.
1
@mariaf.6601 The info you gave is 100% irrelevant and you never adressed his point in the slightest. That's why it's just harassment.
1
@mariaf.6601 It's not the same at all, it's just your attempt at changing the subject. And you're still doing it while still ignoring his points which are, just to repeat, 100% correct and you presented nothing to invalidate them in any way.
1
@mariaf.6601 I don't see any explanation of anything. And I clearly stated it's common knowledge. Your ignorance is your problem, everyone else uses search engine these days.
1
@chefchaudard3580 Yes, no evidence from Puck.
1
@chefchaudard3580 You mean the three articles about Trump? Those are the only sources I can see. Everyone knows Trump wants to end the conflict, that doesn't mean he will.
1
You made NAFO mad by stating facts, good job.
1
@chefchaudard3580 Yes, no evidence from Puck.
1
@rmdomainer9042 Argument from authority, dismissed.
1
@rmdomainer9042 It is clear that OP expressed his opinion on Puck's work and he finds it pretty bad. You stated Puck's credentials as some form of counter argument to invalidate that opinion. Because why else would you mention it? I may have mistaken the terms appeal to/argument from, but you definitely got the point. Puck's credentials do not make him right. Simple enough for you to understand? If you want to defend Puck's work, you need to present something more substantial than mere credentials.
1
@rmdomainer9042 Everyone is free to express their opinion as they like and to me it's clear the OP does not hold Puck in high regard. You have nothing more than Puck's credentials to counter, so my point still stands, dismissed.
1
@rmdomainer9042 You did not call him out for ad hominem, you simply presented Puck's credentials as a counter point, followed by ad hominem of your own. There's no way around it, so maybe you should accept it and stop embarrassing yourself. And if you have trouble understanding what other people say, don't blame me.
1
@qbi4614 Why are you adressing this to me? It's not only irrelevant, but also largely nonsensical. You think I'm American or something?
1
@seandelaney1700 The people of Ukraine are not involved in the slightest. So no, I'm not mistaken.
1
@stream2watch Where exactly does he pretend to be of anglo heritage? Can you quote the exact part for me?
1
@HeadsFullOfEyeballs HOW does that make him pretending ANYTHING? It's YOUR claim, defend it.
1
@stream2watch He can call himself anything he likes, you still failed to explain how he's supposed to pretend anything by that. Can you present any evidence for such ridiculous fantasy? Of course you can't. Good day and good bye.
1