Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "A new stage of Russian hybrid warfare" video.

  1. Step 1: Blame everything on Russia Step 2: Build your whole argument on this false premise. Step 3: Make ridiculous conclusion based on your fallacious argument. This is how Puck operates.
    5
  2. Apparently? So there is no evidence? Then your argument is dismissed.
    4
  3.  @h.a.9880  That's not even an argument, let alone evidence.
    4
  4. It's been about four months since we last talked about the situation on the ground, the reason for it being it's not going well for Ukraine, to put it very mildly. Does NATO still have any chance to avert Russia's inevitable victory? Let's talk about it!
    3
  5.  @jf6772  I still see no evidence. Just saying something doesn't make it true.
    2
  6.  @jeskg720  It isn't? And where did all that NATO equipment come from? And all the "mercenaries" that were by coincidence NATO military personnel?
    2
  7. Get a grip, it's just made up bs.
    2
  8. We don't talk about reality here, we just pretend we do.
    2
  9. Budapest memorandum was broken by the US in 2014. Sorry to burst your bubble.
    2
  10.  @doobybrother21  Where can I find the evidence it happened as you say? Or that it happened at all? Where are the results of the investigation?
    1
  11.  @benholroyd5221  So in other words, you have nothing. How sad.
    1
  12.  @a564-c3q  The point is it definitely wasn't Russia. If it was, we would already know about it. So Puck was dead wrong as always.
    1
  13. Why scary? It's a bogus story with zero evidence presented. Just fear mongering.
    1
  14. Current attacks like what? Can you present a clear example with relevant evidence?
    1
  15.  @bitcoin4life  Asking for example with evidence is gaslighting since when?
    1
  16.  @Therakus  Germany says you are full of it.
    1
  17. There isn't.
    1
  18.  @myboysd5772  When and how did Russia act as your enemy?
    1
  19.  @sebastiand152  What claims? Are you feeling ok in the head?
    1
  20. The reason behind it making no sense is because it's a made up bs.
    1
  21.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  That's not evidence. Educate yourself on the meaning of that word so as not to embarrass yourself again.
    1
  22.  @volkerr.  Of course it was, because Puck said so, right?
    1
  23.  @luffe3441  Nah, I have to defend Puck here, he is not blocking users and his censor filter is quite low, I hardly get censored here at all.
    1
  24.  @luffe3441  I've been calling out his lies for several years now and I'm still here, while being banned on most of western propaganda channels. And the comments - if you actually read trough them, you'll still find many people laughing at Puck's bs stories, so it's not that bad.
    1
  25. Ty nejspíš věříš každý kravině co uslyšíš.
    1
  26.  @enpakeksi765  Makez zero sense either way, because Russia is clearly winning and there is no way they could lose.
    1
  27.  @Therakus  "5. 2. 2022 — Gen. Mark Milley told lawmakers that Kyiv could fall within 72 hours if a full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine takes place". -There you go, sorry to tear your lies to shreds.
    1
  28.  @Therakus  So German assets are somehow legitimate target to you? How does that work?
    1
  29.  @Rickcarleson2152  They don't. Because they aren't.
    1
  30. NATO officer and propagandist. Completely incompetent as both.
    1
  31.  @splitcellsnetwork3828  Nobody's reacting, because it's all just made up NATO propaganda drama.
    1
  32. Have you EVER seen Puck showing ANY evidence for ANYTHING he says?
    1
  33.  @andreaswinsnes6944  It's just a made up bs, come on.
    1
  34. Which somehow came BEFORE this incident. Response indeed.
    1