General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Anders Puck Nielsen
comments

Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "Peace talks will take a long time" video.

You mean stronger than in 2022 during Istanbul talks? Good luck with that.
38
@terjeoseberg990 Sorry, not interested in NAFO silly talking points. Ukraine is losing badly and that's a fact.
10
@jesan733 So someone who writes many comments is somehow "immersed in ru disinfo"? How does that work and what does it even mean?
10
That makes zero sense.
6
Ukraine is not a sovereign nation since 2014.
6
Why don't you talk about the situation on the ground to demonstrate how "neither side is close enough to losing the war"? Is it because the situation clearly shows that your assumption is false? It doesn't take long to sign capitulation and that's exactly what Ukraine will have to do. US will most probably back off completely and Europe will follow to avoid direct confrontation with Russia.
6
Military aid is not enough to prevent Ukraine from losing. And they are indeed losing.
5
@kadovax6567 Of course they will, here, have a pat on the head.
5
@mariaf.6601 You know he's right, but you are too dishonest to admit it. As always.
5
Don't overdo it with the pushing, you might soil your clothes.
5
Name one such agreement please.
5
@SnorriTheLlama Based on the fact that Ukraine is running out of manpower. No amount of military aid can solve that problem. The rest of your drivel is as irrelevant as it is false.
4
@Elbuarto It's speeding up because AFU is attrited to the point of losing combat capability in many sections of the front. Russia is now easily outflanking even major settlements without meeting any substantial resistance. What is irrelevant are your feelings.
4
@GoreTexTillEndEx You used plural, so there is more than one. And "situation on the ground" does not exclusively relate to territorial gains, as you falsely assumed. The phrase "situation on the ground" clearly relates to overall situation on the battlefield and observable trends. And Ukraine is clearly much closer to defeat than Russia. UA troubles with manpower have been widely reported and are indisputable. So there you go.
3
@GoreTexTillEndEx I can see you are struggling with the meaning of words. Situation on the ground clearly shows that AFU is unable to hold the lines, therefore Russia is able to advance. In other words, the territorial gains are direct result of AFU being incapable of holding the lines. That is the situation and the prevailing trend. Manpower shortage in UA is a fact, confirmed by countless sources. Meanwhile you presented exactly zero evidence for it not being the case, as you initially claimed. You have basically nothing, yet you keep yapping. Incredible.
3
@mariaf.6601 He's talking about historical facts, something completely alien to you.
3
@mariaf.6601 False information, reported.
3
@jesan733 You guess wrong. Try again.
3
@jesan733 You made a claim("you're immersed in ru disinfo") based on your observation("I see from your many comments"), that is usually called an argument. Bringing likes into the conversation only lowers your credibility, as they are utterly irrelevant.
3
@kadovax6567 Russia in Iraq? That's a good one.
3
@mariaf.6601 False equivalence fallacy, try something else.
3
@mariaf.6601 Op is stating his personal observation. Which is surprisingly in agreement with everyone else's observations. And there is exactly zero evidence Ukraine thinks they are winning. Puck presented none, you presented none. The end.
3
@mariaf.6601 I never claimed to know what others think. And once again, your question is irrelevant, because OP is not talking about any Ukrainians he "has seen". Also, your reply only confirms that you are unable to use valid arguments. You are taking a big L and it seems you even like it. Weird.
3
@mariaf.6601 False information, reported.
3
@Elbuarto No, I mean the real situation, not propaganda for dummies.
3
The speed is actually increasing and there are no set "distances that need to be covered". This is war of attrition if you haven't noticed yet.
3
@andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416 It wasn't Putin who orchestrated bloody coup in 2014 and sent the army to bomb civilians in Donbass. Zele did literally nothing for peace. All he did was cancelling ban on land sales so he could sell out the country.
3
@mariaf.6601 From countless UA sources. Bye.
3
@mariaf.6601 The winning condition for UA is clearly pushing out Russia and regaining the territories. That statement clearly proves that they know they can't achieve it. But if you insist on deepening your embarrassment, here's a few more quotes. "unfortunately, mobilization does not cover demand from the front line", "We cannot win the war on defense" - Syrskyi
3
@mariaf.6601 Back to the topic. I demonstrated more than sufficiently that UA doesn't think they are winning. Time for you to acknowledge it. Or just disappear as usual.
3
@andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416 It's not 1945, but there are still massive processions in Kiev to glorify SS Galizien division. Any comment?
3
@andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416 Hello? Any comment?
3
@andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416 What context? Massive procession glorifying SS division with full approval of the regime somehow needs context? You think it's somehow marginal? Tf is wrong with you. Go visit Auschwitz to remind you who were the people who get celebrated in Ukraine, dumas.
3
No, he didn't.
3
It's looking promising according to this "analyst".
2
@I_am_Phil_Lee lol
2
@charlesiragui2473 Ukraine won't remain neutral, because it will join RF.
2
@charlesiragui2473 Western Ukraine could get annexed by neighboring countries, it's a banderite region, so that would be quite an ironic turn of events.
2
@xway2 Russian economy is fine, who gave you the strange idea about it crumbling?
2
@GoreTexTillEndEx You know what the phrase "situation on the ground" means, right? Do you have any better example? There should be many, according to what you wrote.
2
@AL-lh2ht Gaining? Where? When?
2
The only Ukrainians ever winning were and still are the ones fighting alongside Russians.
2
What do you expect from a NATO propagandist.
2
@macilowiecki9158 I guess that might work, Russians would be paralyzed with laughter.
2
@jesan733 You did not address the content of my posts in the slightest, you only mentioned the amount. You also did not present an example of the supposed "Ru disinfo", so your argument falls far short of being considered valid in any way.
2
@Therakus How many civilian was killed during those 36 days?
2
@mariaf.6601 You can't prove negative claim, the burden of proof is on the side which made the positive claim. Which is Puck in the first place and you in the second, if you want to defend Puck's claims. That's how this works, so get to it or disappear as usual.
2
@mariaf.6601 OP disagrees with the claim made by Puck - and rightly so, because Puck provided zero evidence for it. Therefore until the evidence for Puck's claim is presented, OP is 100% correct. And you presented NOTHING that would change it. Now disappear as usual.
2
@mariaf.6601 I can actually see what you "did", so I definitely know what you did - you embarrassed yourself to no end. As usual.
2
@andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416 No, you do not understand at all. As usual.
2
@andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416 My input? I just gave you an input. I'm quite sure you have noticed it, as you are reacting to it. Perhaps you could stop lying?
2
Of course he is, he would lose his cozy desk job.
2
Why don't we have a look at the current situation on the ground? Then you can repeat how Ukraine is not very close to losing.
2
Budapest - broken by US in 2014. Minsk - never implemented by Ukraine, western politicians already admitted it was just to gain more time to arm Ukraine. Got anything else?
2
"Which leader would ever Sacrifice his nation." - Zelensky.
2
@andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416 Irrelevant, I'm talking about the Maidan coup. Go back to the corner, shame on you.
2
@erikjensen-d9l You misrepresent the goals of both countries and provide false information to create a silly strawman. Weak.
2
@mariaf.6601 2. 12. 2024 — "Our army lacks the strength to do that. That is true," President Volodymyr Zelensky told Kyodo News regarding the liberation of territories.
2
lol
2
@nigelgarrett7970 If they want to fight, why are the recruiters literally hunting them in the streets and "persuade" them with extreme violence?
1
@nigelgarrett7970 If there was enough troops on the front, Russia wouldn't be advancing. Obviously. Desertions are direct result of forced mobilization, so yes, it applies to the soldiers on the front very much. Anything else?
1
@nigelgarrett7970 Ignoring completely what I just wrote, huh? Ok, why does Russia advance at all? According to UA Russia lost over 800k just killed, three times more of every kind of equipment, their army should be in shambles. And UA losses are supposedly negligible, so they should still have around 800k- 1M strong army. How come they are not able to hold the lines? Explain it in detail.
1
@nigelgarrett7970 It's still the same subject, the one that you started, remember? "there must be enough troops at the front because Russia is advancing at a snail's pace and losing casualties" -Remember? If what you just wrote was the reality, it would make the two armies even and Russia wouldn't be able to advance. But the reality is that desertions are rampant and manpower shortage is growing, therefore Russia is able to advance. Also, how do you get 800k - 1M from 20-30k per month? Can you do the math for me? Because at first glance it just makes me laugh uncontrollably.
1
@nigelgarrett7970 Well, the manpower shortage in Ukraine is a well documented and widely reported fact, so I kinda don't understand what's even your point here. The first reports of Russia recruiting 30k a month started coming out during 2024, present evidence it was the same for 2023, as Russia just mobilized 300k new troops at the end of 2022. Also, Russia had to increase the maximum size of the army by 170k, which shows they are recruiting more than they lose. Keep explaining. That will distract you from the fact that Ukraine is losing badly and there's nothing anyone can do to change it.
1
Russia doesn't care about your silly sanctions.
1
You triggered some nafoids, good job.
1
@GoreTexTillEndEx "I’ve looked at your previous replies and the ones I’ve see are all about land." - For example?
1
@toby9999 It was in fact completely legal according to international law and UN charter, plain and simple.
1
That's why noone will negotiate with Ukraine.
1
@andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416 What facts? You did not present any.
1
That is simply not true.
1
@madsteland2123 Ask the one who made it, why do you ask me?
1
@Ikkeligeglad Yes, you did. Get a brain.
1
lol
1
@myboysd5772 Sure, let's ignore the massive processions in Kiev glorifying SS Galizien.
1
@myboysd5772 Can you be any more vague? I bet you can.
1
Exactly the opposite. Ukraine will remain neutral and will be demilitarized.
1
@mariaf.6601 Putin isn't, you are.
1
@jesan733 Running already? Shame.
1
@jesan733 Still here, but not defending your claim any more.
1
@jesan733 Don't forget about drawing a false conclusion from it while refusing to elaborate what were you even talking about. Truly shameful.
1
@RealistReviewer Everyone's talking about the fabled "Russian propaganda", noone ever gives an example. And you won't be the first, so go back to the corner.
1
@madsteland2123 Victoria Nuland.
1
@pmayo7894 You surely meant "except she handpicked the next UA government after a successful armed coup orchestrated and paid for by the US".
1
@madsteland2123 Logic.
1
lol
1
What are you even talking about?
1
The bottle is a harsh mistress, I just hope you'll be able to lay off the sauce for long enough to supply another exquisite cope video. Wishing all the best.
1
@mariaf.6601 Fantastic, but your question is completely irrelevant. Address what OP really said and use valid arguments. Wait, I take that back, you are unable to do that.
1
@mariaf.6601 I did read it carefully, you didn't. It was you embarrassing yourself the whole time, not me. And it is you who took a huge L, not me.
1
@GeneralSamov I could get paid for making jokes in comments? Please, do go on.
1
Ukraine is not independent and safe since 2014.
1
Nope, his bodyguards are from the west. Azovites hate his guts. For obvious reasons.
1
@RG001100 "sending in the US military" - And getting obliterated in response.
1
@RG001100 Dude, if US sends troops into UA it's nuclear war. Stop being ridiculous.
1
@RG001100 Yes, you clearly are confused. In a case of nuclear war the US would be obliterated. It can not get any simpler than this, even a child would get it.
1
@RG001100 Are you being obtuse? Sending troops would mean direct confrontation in a form of a nuclear war, in which the US would be obliterated. I'll copy the sentence five times now, read all of the copies carefully and try to memorize it. Sending troops would mean direct confrontation in a form of a nuclear war, in which the US would be obliterated. Sending troops would mean direct confrontation in a form of a nuclear war, in which the US would be obliterated. Sending troops would mean direct confrontation in a form of a nuclear war, in which the US would be obliterated. Sending troops would mean direct confrontation in a form of a nuclear war, in which the US would be obliterated. Sending troops would mean direct confrontation in a form of a nuclear war, in which the US would be obliterated.
1
@peterpan7903 The thing you wrote proves beyond any doubt that you definitely are NOT able to think for yourself.
1
lol
1
@nigelgarrett7970 So you basically admit AFU is unable to hold the lines and they moved 73km away from Doneck. Is that somehow supposed to be bad for Russia?
1
@Elbuarto Toretsk - 30k, Pokrovsk- 60k. Argument dismissed.
1
@Elbuarto Toretsk has been fully taken several days ago, there is no more fighting reported there, Pokrovsk is being outflanked and there was already report about fights in the city itself by Mariana Bezuhla. Do your homework before you try to argue with me.
1
@Elbuarto I just checked, the last mention of Pokrovsk on that channel is from yesterday with a video showing destroyed AFU positions in some woods around Pokrovsk. What are you talking about?
1
@Elbuarto My bad, there is no mention of Toretsk today either, so no change there.
1
@Elbuarto No summary came out today. But if you insist, you will surely be able to cite the relevant part of the summary for me to verify.Right?
1
@erikjensen-d9l This might come as a surprise to you, but people of Ukraine are of no interest the collective west except to be utilized in a war against Russia. It's the western assets in Ukraine that are the main reason for continuation of the conflict. Ukraine no longer belongs to Ukrainians. At least not the part under Kiev regime rule.
1
It wasn't a mistake, it was all planned. But the results are not satisfactory.
1
Fake Russian.
1
@АлександрРумянцев-р4й Your comment is so full of falsehoods I find it impossible to believe such ignorant Russian citizen exists. And if you really are Russian, you are definitely not living in Russia for a very long time.
1
@Ikkeligeglad The fact is Ukraine is losing. Badly.
1
@Ikkeligeglad "Russia has been producing military weapons and equipment in excess of its actual needs in Ukraine, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius has claimed." - TheDefensePost, April 26, 2024. And you bringing up the fabled NK troops made me laugh, so thanks for that.
1
@Ikkeligeglad You mean the two well fed asians posing as NK soldiers? Have they been identified? Where can I see the evidence and confirmation of their identity from NK official sources? You don't even have to answer, there is nothing of the sort. 6k tanks is just a random number based on nothing and the rest of your desperate floundering is not even worth reacting to. Poor you, I almost feel sorry for you. Almost.
1