Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "How soon can a NATO-Russia war happen?" video.

  1. Looking forward to Puck trying to spin the loss of Avdeevka as UA success and label the position of encircled UA soldiers as "luxurious".😆
    2
  2. Yea, zero.
    2
  3. We really need a video about how Avdeevka was a huge victory for Ukraine and how Russia suffered crushing losses and that's why Avdeevka fell. Please, give us some copium!😅
    1
  4.  @mariaf.6601  Read again, you missed the name of the town. Anything else, NAFO bot?
    1
  5.  @mariaf.6601  "most of the soldiers retreated" - No, most of them are dead or captured already. There was no mass retreat, only small groups had a chance to pass.
    1
  6.  @mariaf.6601  How about a juicy fu instead? What's YOUR sources for your BS? Start writing it down, no less than thousand words.
    1
  7. What is russian?
    1
  8. America supported Hitler actually. Crawl back under the rock.
    1
  9. Puckie avoids talking about the situation on the front and we all know why.
    1
  10. In this video Puck basically admits that NATO has lost in Ukraine, as he not even once mentions Ukraine winning anymore. He also admits, that Russia currently outproduces NATO militarily and it would take years to catch up. So from NATO perspective the longer the conflict in Ukraine lasts the better, it's just stalling for time paid by the lives of Ukrainian soldiers. Disgusting.
    1
  11.  @nic969  Where do I say it is, troll?
    1
  12.  @mariaf.6601  By that I mean Russia is clearly winning and will complete the goals of the SMO. Not like you would ever be able to acknowledge such information, or dispute it with reasonable argument, so don't even try.😆
    1
  13.  @mariaf.6601  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Get lost, silly puppy.
    1
  14.  @mariaf.6601  How does it feel to be a NAFO bot?
    1
  15.  @mariaf.6601  I'm asking you, because you clearly are one. And I already answered. Your ignorance, whether faked or real, is your problem, not mine.
    1