Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1.  @Cx10110100  What is belgorod? Who are they?
    1
  2. So you want it to be in ruins again?
    1
  3.  @maka6134  That was USSR, not Russia. The same USSR which industrialized and developed Ukraine so in the end people of Ukraine enjoyed higher standards of living than most of the rest of USSR. And the famine wasn't just in Ukraine. You don't even know history, utterly pathetic.
    1
  4. @pilky_boooi If you don't like the reality, it doesn't mean it's bs. And what's balbber?
    1
  5.  @maka6134  Yes, nobody said "Russia ran out of" except you. But since you mentioned Covert Cabal, your mental deficiency is now clear and there is no reason to argue with you any more. People like you need medical treatment.
    1
  6. So...why is Ukraine begging for a ceasefire?
    1
  7.  @galactic-guy  "Given that the allies had great superiority in everything" - That's just false equivalence. And I made no claims. Now answer my question or just disappear and take your shame with you.
    1
  8.  @galactic-guy  So you are unable to back up your argument with anything and you refuse to answer how it is possible for UA to inflict such losses with vastly inferior army. So you are trying to sidetrack instead with irrelevant babbling. Poor you.
    1
  9.  @galactic-guy  You seem to be quite confused, I did not make any claim. Are you feeling ok? Need medical assistance?
    1
  10.  @galactic-guy  Are you obtuse? Fox news is literally western MSM. And the most credible source for Russian losses is in the video - Mediazona. "Russia didn't loose as much as ukraine." - And here's what I actually wrote, if you ever bothered to actually read it: "The facts are that Russia has strong advantage in all kinds of weapons and uses it regularly. There is no possible way for them to have more casualties. It does not compute to any reasonable person. How do you justify such numbers?". Which literally means that I see no way for inferior army to inflict superior casualties. And you completely failed to present anything substantial. I also wrote about the advantage in all kinds of weapons and even hinted at it again with the artillery ratio, you never addressed that gaping hole in your narrative. So once again - and this is your last chance - how can the side with vastly superior firepower in a form of artillery, glide bombs and all sorts of missiles and drones suffer more casualties than the side which has hardly any artillery, glide bombs and just a few rockets and drones? Be specific. How exactly do they do it.
    1
  11.  @jf7009  From NATO.
    1
  12.  @ragingcamper3967  bruh you are lying. Is that being a good NAFO pawn? I guess it is. Edit: lmao
    1