Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "The Fall | Sabotage Operation In Ivano-Frankivsk. More Destroyed Bridges. Military Summary 2023.9.30" video.

@nedsnow6566 As I said, it's practically impossible to check your data. But I'm willing to give it a shot with the himars claim, because that seems to be the biggest BS on your list. Give me some dates of the reports of destroyed himars and I'll check it, let's say 10-20.
4
It's up to Ukrainian nation to rise against the criminal Kiev regime, get rid of all the Ukronazis and stop this nonsense. Because if they won't do it, Russians will have to do it for them the hard way.
4
Maybe you are just bad at compiling data and made some errors. Sometimes the reports sum up longer periods, repeating already stated numbers. And of course noone will bother to check if what you claim is true, as that would require going trough every Russian MoD report.
2
No mention of the chemical attack near Gorlovka? Disappointing.
2
@SokratesLusitanius-th2ji Went from the bottom, found an error right at the second example(December 7th). One HIMARS, two unspecified. You might go triple check, general.
1
@SokratesLusitanius-th2ji No need to spam, I believe you have gone trough those reports. So here's something you might call an explanation. 1) Noone believes the numbers given by Russian MoD are exact. It's a part of information war, just like Ukraine's numbers. 2) The margin of error must be accounted for, different troops can report the same incident, such errors simply happen, it's unavoidable. 3) Nobody knows the exact number of weapons Ukraine recieved, western official numbers are far from trustworthy and I hope you don't believe Ukraine got just what was officially stated. The real numbers are most probably much higher. Thinking otherwise would be naive. 4) The fact, that Ukraine is not making any meaningful progress and is in fact losing badly, despite all the equipment they recieved, can only mean that Russians really destroyed a significant portion of that equipment.
1
@SokratesLusitanius-th2ji Think what you want, but I don't find 4687 tanks, 6409 artillery systems, 315 aircrafts and 316 helicopters anywhere close to the truth. I find it totally ridiculous.
1
@SokratesLusitanius-th2ji Visually confirmed by who? And don't say Oryx, because that's just a pro-Ukrainian propaganda outlet.
1
@SokratesLusitanius-th2ji And it doesn't seem strange to you in any way, that according to Oryx Russian supposedly suffered three times more losses than Ukraine? Ukraine should be winning, they are supposedly smashing Russians effortlessly. Yet Ukraine is clearly losing badly. Care to explain how is that possible?
1
@SokratesLusitanius-th2ji So you are saying, that Russia, which has superior numbers of equipment, strong artillery and air dominance plus long range missile superiority, is having greater losses, because Ukraine has less equipment, inferior numbers of artillery, almost no air power and long range missiles. That makes so much sense. And when I ask how is that even possible, as it defies logic and reason, I bet you will say Ukrainians are just better figters or something along those lines, right? Don't be ridiculous.
1
@SokratesLusitanius-th2ji Whoa, that's a lot of delusional talk. Saying that Ukrop capabilities are rising after their miserably failed offensive is enough justification for me to say that. I'll leave you to your fantasies.
1