Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "Zeihan on Geopolitics" channel.

  1. Never made it past the first minute. Insufferable idiocy.
    16
  2.  @BradBannister-n8b  So in other words, take the crew and the ship as hostages to extort money. That is highly illegal any way you cut it.
    8
  3.  @judewarner1536  Can you name one specific thing he ever got right?
    8
  4. "can easily impound shadow fleet and Russian exports" - How exactly would they do it?
    5
  5.  @darthkek1953  You are comparing apples with oranges. Talk about moral consistency.
    4
  6. Zero is a lot?
    3
  7.  @stafer3  So how it would be legal to hold ships and crews against their will? Or what is your point?
    2
  8. This guy is a bonified idiot, there is no other possible explanation for the ridiculous things he says.
    2
  9. This guy made it almost a full minute without lying, then he goes completely off the rails with human waves and invisible NK soldiers. What an idiotic propaganda.
    2
  10. Or maybe you just don't understand a thing, completely oblivious and deluded.
    2
  11.  @BradBannister-n8b  The tankers are registered and insured. Try harder.
    1
  12.  @stafer3  Russia is not smuggling anything, oil is freely tradable. And how are Russian ships moving trough the territories of NATO countries? That part made me laugh. What Russia created was a safe shipping corridor, which Ukraine used to launch attacks in Black sea, so what you just proved is your dishonesty.
    1
  13.  @stafer3  We are talking about the legality of impounding ships, so far you presented nothing that would allow it even just theoretically. You can't "smuggle" oil, remember? Try again.
    1
  14.  @stafer3  "The countries decided" - The market decides the price. Truck of cigarettes are moving between countries with different price tags daily, it goes pretty well, but it has nothing to do with maritime shipping. Also, no tankers are entering NATO territory "hidden, with oil priced above the limit". Are you feeling ok?
    1
  15.  @BradBannister-n8b  By report by who? It feels like you are agitated for some reason. Present evidence, I'm not interested in your cope drama.
    1
  16.  @stafer3  So basically you agree it is impossible to legally impound any tankers, as you seemingly abandoned all your previous points. Good.
    1
  17.  @BradBannister-n8b  Hey, it's not me making ridiculous claims about tankers being uninsured while it's common knowledge that uninsured tanker wouldn't be allowed to use ANY port infrastructure. So once you are done coping, present evidence for your claim, or just admit it's all made up.
    1
  18.  @BradBannister-n8b  I take it as an admission that it's made up. Your intellectual resources seem to have dried up a while ago.
    1
  19.  @stafer3  "They obviously can’t stop a ship that doesn’t exist." - Here you are admitting it's impossible. Or is there some other hidden meaning I missed? Care to explain? In detail, if possible? Don't be shy, just let yourself go.
    1
  20.  @stafer3  Oh, so now we moved the goalposts to territorial waters? So what's the scenario now, army will board the ship and force it to enter some NATO port to be impounded on the basis of smuggling overpriced oil, even if the tanker is heading somewhere else? This is getting really hilarious, please continue.
    1
  21.  @stafer3  International law grants innocent passage trough territorial waters to all ships. And once again, you can not smuggle oil, it is not prohibited to sell oil in any country, don't be ridiculous. Rules based order, remember? It still stands that there is no legal way to impound any tankers, you still have nothing.
    1
  22.  @BradBannister-n8b  Two losers with zero arguments agreeing with each other? Are you guys a comedic duo now? This sht is so hilarious.
    1
  23.  @stafer3  Well, you sound like someone with zero arguments trying out false equivalence fallacy. It won't work buddy. Take the L like a man at least.
    1
  24.  @darthkek1953  Ok, I get the 1M dead in Iraq. Now, what was the other country with 1M dead? Cambodia maybe? Or Libya? Can you be more specific?
    1
  25.  @darthkek1953  Since when there is 1M dead civilians in UA? Are you even serious?
    1
  26.  @darthkek1953  And there's the difference, you just answered yourself. Russia is fighting UA military, not civilians.
    1
  27. So to summarize - unconfirmed reports, a few conjectures, top it off with wild speculation or two and done - mediocre propaganda.
    1
  28.  @Indrid__Cold  Who told you such a joke? Peter Copehan?
    1
  29.  @12345anton6789  I found no references to Russian economy being a balloon on the verge of popping. Can you be more specific as to where to look?
    1
  30.  @12345anton6789  Still no matching references to any balloons about to pop. Explain yourself.
    1
  31. That is quite an understatement. He's dumb as a rock.
    1
  32. I bet you farted with excitement while writing that hateful drivel.
    1
  33.  @judewarner1536  Pedlar? Seriously? Hilarious af. Back to school, or at least use the fking dictionary for once.
    1
  34. There are literally HUNDREDS of damaged cable incidents a year. Seizing ships on the pretext of a damaged cable is piracy.
    1
  35. You mean exactly like America?
    1
  36.  @nittefils2465  It's not Russian government who claims it. Cry harder.
    1
  37. Ukraine winning like crazy here. What a trash.
    1
  38. Germ.
    1