Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "How Ukraine Endured 80 Days Under Siege: The Battle for Mariupol | Battle Board" video.

No, they had civilians as a human shield.
13
@sH-ed5yf Who is "WE"? And what recent footage do you mean?
7
Cope and seethe.
6
@dennis2376 Russians were the ones evacuating civilians, it's on camera and it is undeniable fact. They also DEMANDED the rest of the civilians in Azovstal to be released numerous times for quite some time. Those civilians, by their own testimony, were largely guided there by Azov from nearby buildings under the guise of safe shelter and they literally shared the same underground complex with the soldiers. It all took so long just because there were civilians present, they were literally used as a leverage to stall Russians and negotiate the "evacuation", which is the term propaganda uses to hide the fact they disgracefully surrendered. The evidence is overwhelming, you have nothing.
5
@bart_grasmat889 Anyone who participated in crimes against the people of Donbass since 2014. Is that enough context?
5
Wait, are you idolizing war criminals? Tf is wrong with you?
4
@AleksiCT Sorry to disappoint you, but Russia is currently winning in Ukraine and their army is stronger than in 2022.
4
@GoreTexTillEndEx That is just as irrelevant as it is wrong. Double whammy of a dummy.
3
@juliusbulle lol
3
@betsm5842 Do you know there is a channel on YT with a lot of recent videos from Mariupol? Well, there is and you are simply lying.
3
@sH-ed5yf You are comparing about a dozen guys with literal thousands.
3
You mean absolute war criminals.
3
@sH-ed5yf The withdrawal from Kiev has actually been proposed by Kiev as a condition for further negotiations.
2
@dittoditto7283 You did not present anything that would invalidate what I wrote in any way, shape, or form. Why are you here then?
2
@sH-ed5yf You seem to have ignored any news from Mariupol for three years.
2
You can't go even a full minute without lying, can you? Not even worth watching. Reported as misinformation.
2
@jamesoconnor5908 And also none were captured, right? Right? I mean, right?
2
@AleksiCT Russia never announced any time limit, your argument is void.
2
The joke's on you, they have neither of those. Cope harder.
2
@artyparty_av Just as a side note, Russian MoD numbers seem to be more or less accurate. At least compared to UA sources.
1
@horcheveiss3760 You realize there is plenty evidence which completely debunks everything that you wrote? But let's just say it's true, now tell me, why were Russians shelling the city?
1
Stick to the script, it's 3 days and we don't mention Kursk any more. Sheesh, these new hires are terrible.
1
@harryselwood582 That's what you get with automatic translation? Hilarious and completely wrong grammatically. You reek of desperation.
1
@harryselwood582 Don't even try, as you can see you have been exposed already, so drop the silly act.
1
@LonYi-zk7se Nothing got deleted, YT is just hiding the reactions so they can be seen only when you sort comments from newest. Old trick.
1
@shortrandomusername So why literally hundreds to thousands of eye witnesses accused Azov of exactly that? They are all lying right?
1
@benjames5423 The problem here is that it wasn't hit by Russia. That much is clear from the investigation and eye witnesses.
1
@maka6134 So the hundreds of videos of banderites using schools and hospitals as bases and hiding equipment in malls is not enough proof for you?
1
@maka6134 Spot on your shirt maybe.
1
@KukharyshynOleh You are joking, right? Do you realize, that the "documentary" is just proving my point? It documents AFU taking positions among civilians without even trying to evacuate anyone anywhere. Russia held safe evacuation corridors regularly and announced them to AFU every single time. Not even once AFU organized anything even remotely resembling evacuation. Next!
1
@fahrradra6856 You also somehow forgot about the number of civilian casualties mentioned. Any comment?
1
@sH-ed5yf Just like I wrote in another thread where you deny reality, there is quite a lot of video evidence from that time.
1
@jamesoconnor5908 Yea, they all just coincidentally left the army right before they departed for Ukraine, right? Btw all troops financed, trained and armed by NATO are technically NATO troops, no matter what country are they from.
1
@AleksiCT If you want to defend your claim, present evidence. How hard is that?
1
@betsm5842 Of course there is, just look in a mirror.
1
@sH-ed5yf You realize there is video footage from that time, don't you? Quite a lot of it.
1
@sH-ed5yf I just told you there is quite a lot of footage and you keep mumbling some irrelevant bs. Shame.
1
@fawn3100 As an official, how could you justify Fleeing the city at the first opportunity, ignoring your duties and leaving hundreds of thousands of people behind without even a warning?
1
@fawn3100 Fact? Fact is that Russians surrounded the city BECAUSE A FEW THOUSAND BANDERITES FORTIFIED IN IT. Say again , who took the civilians hostage? Who held them MONTHS in Azovstal and refused to release them for quite a long time? Go on, keep explaining.
1
Hilarious, thanks for the laugh.
1
@deslow7411 If you have to ask how is this video biased you are beyond any help.
1
@maka6134 Sure, armored columns, whatever you say. You realize Azov wasn't the only one filming, don't you? I'm sure you do.
1
@Jerrysmithelberry I say I believe people who survived there much more than blatant propaganda. And people who survived there ALL say it was AFU responsible for majority of the destruction and death.
1
@gentlefush8020 They did? When and where exactly?
1