Comments by "" (@rogerwilco5918) on "Военное телевидение" channel.

  1. I'm pretty sure being a maintenance nightmare has a lot to do with it too.
    18
  2.  @makegaminggreatagain3907  that's because if all you've done is watch videos of Russia fighting ukraine you've never seen Bradleys or any other IFV's used properly.
    5
  3.  @rodrigoquiroga8590  well yeah, the puma is the next generation.. they won't ever be pitted against eachother on a battlefield, but there's a reason we decided not to buy them as replacements. And there's a reason they only made 350. There is no equal adversary at this time, and no IFV in existence has as many tanks kills as the Bradley. As a former mechanized infantryman I'm genuinely excited to see our next gen IFV soon.. but until then, it does the job better than anything our enemies have.
    5
  4.  @nesseihtgnay9419  not arguing any of that.. it's simply too tall.
    5
  5. I personally helped take the "swim barriers" off in 96.. the port fire weapons were fun, but we never actually fired them through the port.
    4
  6.  @makegaminggreatagain3907  junk compared to what?
    3
  7. The Abrams was updated to a modern battle tank because of intelligent design. It didn't have catastrophic design flaws like the t72.
    3
  8. Too tall..
    3
  9. Yes, but the upgrades on the Abrams put it leaps and bounds ahead. No need to reinvent the wheel.
    2
  10.  @mauricehodgson3143  I've lost count of how many times they were going to replace it.. eventually they actually will, and I have high hopes.. my biggest complaint is that it's underpowered if we're supposed to keep up with the Abrams, and it's too tall..
    2
  11. The Bradley destroyed more tanks in desert storm than Abrams did.
    1
  12.  @nuclearnadal9385  lynx is next generation, and there's a reason it didn't pass the testing phase for the US to buy them as replacements. And sorry, you can't deny the Bradley's service record.
    1
  13. Not the good parts.
    1
  14. Compared to what?
    1
  15. How so??
    1
  16. Who told you that????
    1
  17. They didn't replace anything when they were phased in.
    1
  18. Just like a Bradley.
    1
  19. Of course they do, but unfortunately Russian sex boats are more important.
    1
  20.  @nesseihtgnay9419  As a former infantryman and anti tank team leader, it sure does. And as a former Bradley driver/gunner you constantly have to be aware where you're putting that big tall silhouette/target 🎯
    1
  21. A tank is a tank, until it's in a fight with a real tank.
    1
  22. The Chrysler 300 looks like a Bentley phantom, until it's next to a Bentley phantom.
    1
  23.  @codyayres  why in my day us Manchus' stayed in Korea 🧓 "Keep up the fire" 1/9 inf.
    1
  24. More so on the inside of the tank than the outside.
    1
  25. And it's been upgrade with cutting edge technology thanks to intelligent design. And it didn't have catastrophic design flaws, like Russian tanks.
    1