Comments by "" (@rogerwilco5918) on "BBC News" channel.

  1. 😂 2 month old account
    1
  2. 😂 Dasvidaniya Comrade!
    1
  3. 😂 you don't think NATO can match any response? Looks to me like they're doing that the whole time. Imagine if they were actually fighting nato, this would have been over in a week. Putin could walk through Kiev today and it still wouldn't wash the stench of failure from the pathetic Russian "army".
    1
  4. No. In a referendum everyone would have been allowed to vote.
    1
  5. Actually that's a problem with dictatorships.. I don't believe there's ever been an a legitimate communist government ever. They're always dictatorships parading as communism.
    1
  6. Where's Russia kicking anyone's ass? Looks like the other way around to me lately. I wonder what happened...
    1
  7. Explosives that don't go "boom"? What "swab tests"? The beams were cut during the rescue/recovery. Sure, it was wired and nobody noticed 😂
    1
  8. Sources? Wasn't he telling stories to kids when it happened?
    1
  9. It's a conspiracy theory when you have absolutely no evidence.
    1
  10. Sources?
    1
  11. What are you seeing that normal people can't see?
    1
  12. @firestream93  the firefighters were talking about secondary explosions which should be expected there. Entirely different than the signature daisy chain explosions of a controlled demolition
    1
  13.  @RS54321  I guess that all depends on what silly ideas you have rattling around in your little nutcase head.
    1
  14.  @RS54321  there's a huge difference between "questioning things" and making s*** up.
    1
  15.  @Lee-wg7en  what???
    1
  16.  @proteg3881  sources on you "3/5%" nonsense? That sounds made up to me.
    1
  17.  @jordancostello3385  try again in English
    1
  18.  @coolk3dat754  you're presenting nonsense. You want to pretend people heard something they didn't.
    1
  19.  @coolk3dat754  😂 common sense would dictate that with the complete absence of the signature chain of explosions, controlled demolition is impossible.
    1
  20.  @coolk3dat754  daisy chain is a term we use in the military when explosives are linked together, again I wouldn't expect you to understand that either.. ever play with explosives? I have.
    1
  21.  @coolk3dat754  a controlled demolition has a signature daisy chain of explosions.
    1
  22.  @coolk3dat754  sorry, I've seen the videos.. no explosions.. however I did see the video of the fireman talking about secondary explosions, but if you knew your ass from a hole in the ground you would know that's not the same.
    1
  23.  @dunexapa1016  and explosives that don't go "boom"?
    1
  24.  @dunexapa1016  😂 who told you that nonsense? And please explain your magical explosives that don't go "boom"?
    1
  25. Yeah? Is there any actual actual evidence of your version of the truth?
    1
  26. Where was that "proved"?
    1
  27. Who said fuel "melted" anything?
    1
  28. Uh, destroyed??
    1
  29.  @benjaminhenderson7059  they knew it was going to collapse hours before it did.. Is that supposed to be evidence of something?
    1
  30.  @evobase  just so we're clear, you're still completely empty handed, and you never actually "debunked" anything?
    1
  31.  @evobase  I've literally been asking you to do the opposite. I've noticed people like you like to pretend you have all the answers.. right up until someone asks you a question.. then quit predictably, you have nothing.. you can almost set you watch by it.
    1
  32.  @evobase  where do you think you did that? I've noticed that when you idiots say "critical thinking" you mean you're literally making shit up.
    1
  33.  @evobase  Wow! You're gonna be famous!!! What did you debunk??
    1
  34.  @evobase  and who told you that nonsense?
    1
  35.  @evobase  yeah? When did that happen?
    1
  36.  @evobase  Just so we're clear, you've got absolutely no form of evidence, and you're completely empty handed?
    1
  37. Because there is absolutely no evidence that would suggest that.
    1
  38. Paranoia isn't evidence
    1
  39.  @devourthepower007  what a surprise, no actual evidence.. Why don't you people just come here and go "bahhhh bahhhh"?
    1
  40.  @devourthepower007  😂 and what's the "evidence"? Magic explosives that don't go "boom"?
    1
  41.  @devourthepower007  😂 there's also a very convincing "documentary" on bigfoot.. it's on YouTube, so you know it's real.
    1
  42. Sources?
    1
  43. "millions"?? Sources??
    1
  44. And?
    1
  45.  @DeverHB  I didn't ask why wtc7 collapsed, I asked if the other building had massive structural damage. So, the fire was put out, unlike wtc7. Again, you're trying to use ignorance as evidence.
    1
  46.  @DeverHB  I was asking because you're trying to compare 2 completely different scenarios. And you're saying it didn't have massive structural damage from part on one if the tallest buildings in the world fall on it, and they actually fought the fire and put it out. A few more than subtle differences, wouldn't you say? How about the construction of the buildings? Were they similar?
    1
  47.  @DeverHB  and did it have massive structural damage from another building falling on it?
    1
  48.  @DeverHB  I didn't ask what the report said about the fuel, I asked if it had the equivalent of 4 passenger jets worth of fuel. So, they did actually fight the fire though, huh?
    1
  49.  @DeverHB  it's appears that you're trying to use ignorance as evidence.. "I can't comprehend something, so it must be fake". Did "one meridian plaza" have 40,000 gallons of diesel fuel stored in multiple tanks? Did they even try to fight the fire, unlike wtc7? Did it have massive structural damage from a chunk of one one the worlds tallest buildings fall on it? Did the fire suppression systems work, unlike wtc7? Was it built with the same kind of structure?
    1
  50.  @DeverHB  how is it relevant how long it took them?
    1