Comments by "Andrea" (@plankark) on "Golden State Times"
channel.
-
19
-
15
-
5
-
4
-
+Dac Tucker 0.7%, 7%, 77% is not the point. The point is where do you draw the line for the 'universal "Basic Concept' where people want what is best for their family and friends'. There are billions of poor people living in 2nd and 3rd world countries who want what is best for their family and friends. Where do you draw the line for "undocumented" citizens? How many, from which countries, or from all countries or are you going to discriminate against selected nations? What jobs should "undocumented" citizens be allowed to have? Surely they require equality like all citizens? And representation in all areas of the nation. As these people are disadvantaged they will need assistance in language, education, health care, housing, interview skills, skills development, developing small business etc. I hope you do not want to discriminate against these people according to their needs. I certainly trust you would not discriminate against their extended family and friends and acquaintances accessing these universal needs. Then we can move on to the question again: Where do you draw the line for illegal "undocumented" citizens? Where do you draw the line for any illegal activity? If 0.7% is okay with you does that include all illegal activity? And why is your selected percentage supposed to be acceptable for everyone else?
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1