Comments by "Aaron Carson" (@aaroncarson1770) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder"
channel.
-
447
-
144
-
101
-
I'm only one voice here, but I would LOVE for Sam to interview her. I understand his reservations, but I think the audience would learn a lot from the intersectionality of ideas, where Marianne and Seder agree on so many points. Both might surprise each other. I think Sam is more loving than he even realises himself, and Marianne is more practical, in that nuts and bolts, economic systems sort of way, that is often the main theme of the Majority Report, than her brand usually portrays . I've heard the coalition argument coming up repeatedly. I wonder what that would look like for those of us who watch the media. Would we necessarily know, what coalitions had been formed? Also, when does a coalition become something more sinister, like a super PAC?
55
-
48
-
40
-
31
-
29
-
27
-
18
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
It's not only the fact that she can quote the Bible, the Talmud, the Dalai Lama, Martin Luther king, and Nelson Mandela, and tie it all together, and apply it to public policy. It's not only the fact that she knows the history of America at a federal level, she also knows the history state by state, it's that there are no cue cards or prompters! This is all in her head! She remembers it, and can rattle it all off at a moment's notice, because she lives and breathes it. She understands what connects to what, and why it's relevant.
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Lets be really real. Right out of the gate, in 2019. They saw her coming, and started planning the smears. The view didn't even pretend they hadn't anointed Biden. They were all atwitter.
From the outset Marianne painted a target on the backs of the war machine, and there are several major networks with their fingers in that pie. Nobody in Washington, or on the networks gives a tinkers cuss about Marianne's spirituality. They HAD to attack her. She was coming after Biden, who's best qualification for the presidency was his association with Obama, with a detailed reparations plan in her pocket, and no PAC money. In other words, a lose cannon, as far as the establishment is concerned. If she was into bird watching, they'd have attacked bird watching. If she was a stamp collector, they'd have attacked that.
There was never any way in tarnation, that a candidate who was not bought and paid for, talks about peace and reparations, and uses language people understand, was going to get a fair shake from the media, or the DNC. It's against their interests. But it should totally be tried, and tried again.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nedlightowlers5168 When I first heard she was running, I thought her whole campaign would be a vague feel good campaign, but seeing her speak, and looking at the legion of policies on her website convinced me that there's a lot more to her than the cover of one of her books.
She's made public funding for electoral campaigns her first order of business, she's wholly grass roots, she's laid out a very concrete plan for reparations, she's committed to ban fracking, repeal the tax cuts for the very wealthy, and reinstate the middle class tax cuts, she's committed to appoint a world class environmentalist to the head of the EPA and a world class humanitarian as secretary of state. Frankly she's as good as any other candidate except on the issue of Assange, which I think she's in the process of informing herself about. She's also a very memorable figure, which I think it's an important facet of a campaign.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1