Comments by "Aaron Carson" (@aaroncarson1770) on "The Hill" channel.

  1. AND these four have not taken corporate PAC money. Coincidence? And both Tulsi and Marianne were the two most googled in both sets of debates.
    1
  2. "We are drowning in information, and starving for understanding." Marianne Williamson.
    1
  3.  @JustMe-ec2ph  She has said that she wants to cancel the Willow Project, transition off fossil fuels, and implement an even more stringent version of the Green New Deal. She has said she would not contnue assisting Saudi Arabia in it's attack on Yemen, and she would put conditions on the aid to Israel. She would also order an audit on the Pentagon. As far as vaccine mandates go, she has said that she wants a n independent study on the safety of drugs and medicine, not funded by big pharma. The other stuff I'm not sure about.
    1
  4.  @JustMe-ec2ph  Ah sorry the experience. None in public office, but a ton in non profit work. She said she kept encountering suffering that was caused by bad public policy rather than anything that people were doing wrong themselves.
    1
  5.  @JustMe-ec2ph  Okay, I get you. Personally it was when I heard her roaring on stage that I was convinced by her, but that might not be the right medicine for everyone.
    1
  6.  @MarquisVegan  I didn't know that about you. That's so interesting.
    1
  7. :face-red-heart-shape::face-red-heart-shape::face-red-heart-shape:
    1
  8.  @Exxeron-ob3tv  I propose to them that they might consider the same rabble rousing, attention grabbing quality that Marianne has. In 2019 she had all white audiences in Iowa and New Hampshire surging to their feet, and roaring for reparations, while Warren had to buy thundersticks for her audience to get them to make some noise.
    1
  9. For starters? No PAC money. For another? charisima! And another? extensive policies.
    1
  10. The party system
    1
  11. :face-red-heart-shape::face-red-heart-shape::face-red-heart-shape:
    1
  12. :face-red-heart-shape::face-red-heart-shape::face-red-heart-shape::face-red-heart-shape::face-red-heart-shape:
    1
  13.    I'm so with you on the weapons. I don't think any nation should be profiting from weapons. She did condemn those cluster bombs. And she's also for a settlement. I think when Status Coup and RBN first asked her, she didn't want to take a strong position either way, on that particular situation, because she didn't know where it would be when the elections happened. I think her peace department would always prioritize negotiation. When Politicians say that, it's usually bs, but she's a writer. She talks human.
    1
  14. Was the main source The Daily Beast though?
    1
  15. What's with the "Heal the Divide" superPAC. Is that a real thing?
    1
  16. A total Leonard.
    1
  17. If they cancel the primary, they forfeit the delegates according to Cenk.
    1
  18. The Daily Beast is well named. It's not terribly brainy, just destructive.
    1
  19. How about "Womanson" like Akayla Gardner called Marianne?
    1
  20. Tulsi looked really sad when she did that. It was totally necessary, but she seems to really dislike the infighting.
    1
  21.  @dbesson  Good point. I even think they'll treat her slightly worse. Bernie has two things that the establishment likes. Male, and Senetor. Marianne wants reparations and has declared the war machine her target. That's sacrilege to the establishment.
    1
  22. 🤔🤔🤔
    1
  23. That's how I view any candidate who takes PAC money. She doesn't
    1
  24. RFK junior went independent.
    1
  25. Because actual politicians are cogs, not architects.
    1
  26. Bri might have invited him on, just to highlight that. She seemed very prepared, and very satisfied at the end.
    1
  27.  @JackSartoris  Marianne is not Bernie. Very very very true. Marianne is Trump, with a brain, a conscience, and beauty.
    1
  28. They're stumping for him in essence.
    1
  29. Well they would do wouldn't they? They're only in favour of Biden. MSNBC, pro Biden, CNN pro Trump (always were). Fox...... Pro Marianne?
    1
  30. Indeed! A second run makes sense for name recognition.
    1
  31. They asked last time she was on. We're on to new excuses for cancellation now.
    1
  32. They can't though. It's a primary, or no candidates, no delegates, no Florida in terms of the primary. I think Cenk is right and they cancelled Biden with the bathwater.
    1
  33. :face-red-heart-shape::face-red-heart-shape::face-red-heart-shape:
    1
  34. Well she's been advocating for reparations since 1997, for what that's worth.
    1
  35. Also, they have to get Biden out of bed first.
    1
  36. Lets call a spade a spade. CNN is, and has always been, on the side of Trump. They have been covering him non stop for five years. That's advertising.
    1
  37. Scaly even.
    1
  38. Who cares who she would support?; seriously, who give a flying you know what? People can support her now, and support someone else if she changes spots.
    1
  39. Because there are these creatures called "Americans" who watch those platforms, and she cares about them.
    1
  40. With an eighties soap villainess demeanor.
    1
  41. You could, but realistically, you need some sort of following.
    1
  42. Marianne's right. It's turning into an aristocracy.
    1
  43. You can though
    1
  44. They can't stop you
    1
  45.  @greybuckleton  In Florida. She's on the ballot in South Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada, and California, to name the prominent ones.
    1
  46.  @greybuckleton  Which state is the one you have to vote in, in the primary?
    1
  47. A total Leonard.
    1
  48. Since 1988? That's a deep cover if she is.
    1
  49. There has never been a woman president either.
    1
  50. So if we want change, we might have to break from tradition a bit.
    1