Comments by "Ivan" (@Ivan-wp1ne1) on "BBC News" channel.

  1. The German press writes: The Russians are fighting better... than expected "The Russians are fighting better than expected. The attacks since Thursday have not yet led to the liberation of any cities or even villages," writes Bild, describing the events on the southern front. You read these reports of the German press today about the unexpected resilience of the Russian army, and you remember that 80 years ago, already other Germans, in the same way, at first with surprise, and then with horror, wrote... the same: "October 1, 1942. Our assault battalion reached the Volga. More precisely, the Volga is still 500 meters away. Tomorrow we will be on the other side and the war is over." "October 3. Very strong fire resistance, we cannot overcome these 500 meters. We are standing on the border of some grain elevator." "October 6th. Damn elevator. It is impossible to approach him. Our losses exceeded 30%." "October 10th. Where do these Russians come from? The elevator is no longer there, but every time we approach it, there is a fire coming from under the ground." "October 15th. Hooray, we have overcome the elevator. There are 100 people left from our battalion." And a little lower: "It turned out that the elevator was defended by 18 Russians, we found 18 corpses." Comment: I would advise modern Germans (and not only them) to read the memoirs of their own soldiers, officers and generals of that war, who ended their "victorious" campaign in Russia by capitulating in Berlin. As we can see, history repeats itself here too,
    34
  2. 14
  3. 13
  4. 11
  5. 10
  6. 9
  7. 9
  8. 7
  9. 6
  10. 6
  11. 6
  12. 5
  13. 4
  14. 4
  15. 4
  16. 3
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out airstrikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries… @ukr_leaks
    2
  51. 2
  52. 2
  53. 2
  54. 2
  55. 2
  56. 2
  57. 2
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out air strikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out air strikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out air strikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  147. Brief political science Dictionary of the English language-correct interpretation of words and expressions: The entire civilized world-all the colonies of the United States Global civilizational values-conditions of vassalage under US sovereignty Democracy-the power of the anglo-Saxons over demos We have a democracy, all powers belong to the anglo-Saxons. You have no democracy – you have something that the anglo-Saxons consider their own You have totalitarianism-you have something that the anglo-Saxons consider their own, and you don't want to give it to them You are violating human rights-you are violating the rights of the anglo-Saxons to take from you what they like… We fight for human rights-we fight for the rights of the anglo-Saxons to kill those who do not want to give them something We have freedom of speech - we can only say what is approved in the US State Department You don't have freedom of speech – you allow yourself too much of what the US State Department disapproves of. Russia threatens the entire civilized community – for some reason Russia does not want to be a colony of the USA The whole civilized world against Russia – all US colonies against Russia Our actions are not directed against Russia – all our actions are directed against Russia We support the struggle for Human Rights in Russia-we support the destruction of Russians by all available means We are worried about human rights in Russia-we are worried that the destruction of Russians is not happening at a sufficient pace Russian propaganda lies-the anglo-Saxons lie and do not blush
    1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out air strikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out air strikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203.  @HOusu88  and your memory is short… “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out air strikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out air strikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. Brief political science Dictionary of the English language-correct interpretation of words and expressions: The entire civilized world-all the colonies of the United States Global civilizational values-conditions of vassalage under US sovereignty Democracy-the power of the anglo-Saxons over demos We have a democracy, all powers belong to the anglo-Saxons. You have no democracy – you have something that the anglo-Saxons consider their own You have totalitarianism-you have something that the anglo-Saxons consider their own, and you don't want to give it to them You are violating human rights-you are violating the rights of the anglo-Saxons to take from you what they like… We fight for human rights-we fight for the rights of the anglo-Saxons to kill those who do not want to give them something We have freedom of speech - we can only say what is approved in the US State Department You don't have freedom of speech – you allow yourself too much of what the US State Department disapproves of. Russia threatens the entire civilized community – for some reason Russia does not want to be a colony of the USA The whole civilized world against Russia – all US colonies against Russia Our actions are not directed against Russia – all our actions are directed against Russia We support the struggle for Human Rights in Russia-we support the destruction of Russians by all available means We are worried about human rights in Russia-we are worried that the destruction of Russians is not happening at a sufficient pace Russian propaganda lies-the anglo-Saxons lie and do not blush
    1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272.  @crook4422  What are NATO's options? And they don't have any options. The level, scope and severity of the conflict in Ukraine is unimaginable for the alliance. NATO troops are not ready for this, are not trained and are not equipped. NATO does not have the necessary supply system for this, especially with regard to the power of artillery fire. NATO has no army worth mentioning. All NATO forces are dispersed throughout Europe, and in order to assemble them, they will have to withdraw troops from the barracks, and for 80% of NATO troops this is impossible. They cannot leave the barracks because they have no equipment, no supply system, nothing. And then they have to be moved from all over Europe to the collection point, and roads, bridges, tunnels are not adapted for this. We are already getting problems here. Europe has no options. That's why the Vilnius summit is of the utmost importance and why the Ukrainians blew up this dam. Because NATO will face the fact that they have nothing but loud statements. And they will begin to realize that their worst nightmares will come true. Russia will win this military conflict by the end of summer, by the beginning of autumn. They have time for this. What will NATO do then? So politically they have to find a way out of this conflict. People are talking about Poland. Understand, the Polish army is no good, they cannot carry out operations on such a scale. While the Russians are experts in this, they have been honing their skills in this for more than a year. There is no force in the world that could cope with this better than Russia. Because no one else has ever been in such conflicts. They have built an amazing doctrinal defense, Ukrainians have no chance to crack it. And their troops have recently been trained in a doctrinal offensive so that when the time comes, the Russians can carry out a large-scale offensive operation that no one in Europe is capable of carrying out. So NATO has no options but to find a way out of the catastrophe that they have arranged.
    1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1