Youtube comments of Ivan (@Ivan-wp1ne1).

  1. 305
  2. 219
  3. 167
  4. 120
  5. 86
  6. 69
  7. 68
  8. 65
  9. 56
  10. 55
  11. 55
  12. 54
  13. 44
  14. 41
  15. 39
  16. 38
  17. 37
  18. 36
  19. 36
  20. 34
  21. 34
  22. The German press writes: The Russians are fighting better... than expected "The Russians are fighting better than expected. The attacks since Thursday have not yet led to the liberation of any cities or even villages," writes Bild, describing the events on the southern front. You read these reports of the German press today about the unexpected resilience of the Russian army, and you remember that 80 years ago, already other Germans, in the same way, at first with surprise, and then with horror, wrote... the same: "October 1, 1942. Our assault battalion reached the Volga. More precisely, the Volga is still 500 meters away. Tomorrow we will be on the other side and the war is over." "October 3. Very strong fire resistance, we cannot overcome these 500 meters. We are standing on the border of some grain elevator." "October 6th. Damn elevator. It is impossible to approach him. Our losses exceeded 30%." "October 10th. Where do these Russians come from? The elevator is no longer there, but every time we approach it, there is a fire coming from under the ground." "October 15th. Hooray, we have overcome the elevator. There are 100 people left from our battalion." And a little lower: "It turned out that the elevator was defended by 18 Russians, we found 18 corpses." Comment: I would advise modern Germans (and not only them) to read the memoirs of their own soldiers, officers and generals of that war, who ended their "victorious" campaign in Russia by capitulating in Berlin. As we can see, history repeats itself here too,
    34
  23. 33
  24. 33
  25. 31
  26. 29
  27. 28
  28. 28
  29. 27
  30. 26
  31. 26
  32. 25
  33. 24
  34. 24
  35. 23
  36. 22
  37. 22
  38. 22
  39. 21
  40. 21
  41. 20
  42. 20
  43. 19
  44. 19
  45. 19
  46. 19
  47. 19
  48. 18
  49. 18
  50. 18
  51. 17
  52. 17
  53. 17
  54. 17
  55. 16
  56. 15
  57. 15
  58. 14
  59. 14
  60. 14
  61. 14
  62. 14
  63. 14
  64. 14
  65. 14
  66. 14
  67. 14
  68. 14
  69. 14
  70. 14
  71. 13
  72. 13
  73. 13
  74. 13
  75. 13
  76. 13
  77. 13
  78. 13
  79. 13
  80. 13
  81. 13
  82. 12
  83. 12
  84. 12
  85. 12
  86. 12
  87. 12
  88. 12
  89. 12
  90. 12
  91. 12
  92. 12
  93. 12
  94. 12
  95. 11
  96. 11
  97. 11
  98. 11
  99. 11
  100. 11
  101. 11
  102. 11
  103. 11
  104. 11
  105. 11
  106. 11
  107. 11
  108. 11
  109. 11
  110. 11
  111. 11
  112. 10
  113. 10
  114. 10
  115. 10
  116. 10
  117. 10
  118. 10
  119. 10
  120. 10
  121. 10
  122. 10
  123. 10
  124. 10
  125. 10
  126. 10
  127. 9
  128. 9
  129. 9
  130. 9
  131. 9
  132. 9
  133. 9
  134. 9
  135. 9
  136. 9
  137. 9
  138. 9
  139. 9
  140. 9
  141. 9
  142. 9
  143. 9
  144. 9
  145. 9
  146. 9
  147. 9
  148. 9
  149. 8
  150. 8
  151. 8
  152. 8
  153. 8
  154. 8
  155. 8
  156. 8
  157. 8
  158. 8
  159. 8
  160. 8
  161. 8
  162. 8
  163. 8
  164. 8
  165. 8
  166. 8
  167. 8
  168. 8
  169. 8
  170. 8
  171. 8
  172. 8
  173. 8
  174. 8
  175. 8
  176. 8
  177. 7
  178. 7
  179. 7
  180. 7
  181. 7
  182. 7
  183. 7
  184. 7
  185. 7
  186. 7
  187. 7
  188. 7
  189. 7
  190. 7
  191. 7
  192. 7
  193. 7
  194. 7
  195. 7
  196. 7
  197. 7
  198. 7
  199. 7
  200. 7
  201. 7
  202. 7
  203. 7
  204. 7
  205. 6
  206. The Sept. 6 missile strike on Kostiantynivka in eastern Ukraine was one of the deadliest in the country in months, killing at least 15 civilians and injuring more than 30 others. The weapon’s payload of metal fragments struck a market, piercing windows and walls and wounding some victims beyond recognition. Less than two hours later, President Volodymyr Zelensky blamed Russian “terrorists” for the attack, and many media outlets followed suit. Throughout its invasion of Ukraine, Russia has repeatedly and systematically attacked civilians and struck schools, markets and residences as a deliberate tactic to instill fear in the populace. In Kostiantynivka in April, they shelled homes and a preschool, killing six. But evidence collected and analyzed by The New York Times, including missile fragments, satellite imagery, witness accounts and social media posts, strongly suggests the catastrophic strike was the result of an errant Ukrainian air defense missile fired by a Buk launch system. The attack appears to have been a tragic mishap. Air defense experts say missiles like the one that hit the market can go off course for a variety of reasons, including an electronic malfunction or a guidance fin that is damaged or sheared off at the time of launch. The likely missile failure happened amid the back-and-forth battles common in the surrounding area. Russian forces shelled Kostiantynivka the night before; Ukrainian artillery fire from the city was reported in a local Telegram group just minutes before the strike on the market. A spokesman for Ukraine’s armed forces said the country’s security service is investigating the incident, and under national law can’t comment further. Ukrainian authorities initially tried to prevent journalists with The Times from accessing the missile debris and impact area in the strike’s immediate aftermath. But the reporters were eventually able to get to the scene, interview witnesses and collect remnants of the weapon used.
    6
  207. 6
  208. 6
  209. 6
  210. 6
  211. 6
  212. 6
  213. 6
  214. 6
  215. 6
  216. 6
  217. 6
  218. 6
  219. 6
  220. 6
  221. 6
  222. 6
  223. 6
  224. 6
  225. 6
  226. 6
  227. 6
  228. 6
  229. 6
  230. 6
  231. 6
  232. 6
  233. 6
  234. 6
  235. 6
  236. 6
  237. 6
  238. 6
  239. 6
  240. 6
  241. 6
  242. 6
  243. 6
  244. 6
  245. 6
  246. 6
  247. 6
  248. 6
  249. 6
  250. 6
  251. 6
  252. 6
  253. 6
  254. 6
  255. 6
  256. 6
  257. 6
  258. 6
  259. 6
  260. 6
  261. 6
  262. 6
  263. 6
  264. 6
  265. 6
  266. 6
  267. 6
  268. 6
  269. 6
  270. 6
  271. 6
  272. 5
  273. 5
  274. 5
  275. 5
  276. 5
  277. 5
  278. 5
  279. 5
  280. 5
  281. 5
  282. 5
  283. 5
  284. 5
  285. 5
  286. 5
  287. 5
  288. 5
  289. 5
  290. 5
  291. 5
  292. 5
  293. 5
  294. 5
  295. 5
  296. 5
  297. 5
  298. 5
  299. 5
  300. 5
  301. 5
  302. 5
  303. 5
  304. 5
  305. 5
  306. 5
  307. 5
  308. 5
  309. 5
  310. 5
  311. 5
  312. 5
  313. When the Maidan happened, I was immediately called: "Professor Sachs, the new Ukrainian Prime Minister would like to see you to discuss the economic crisis because I am quite good at this." I flew to Kyiv and was taken through Maidan, where I was told how the U.S. had paid money to all the people around Maidan. A spontaneous revolution of dignity? Ladies and gentlemen, where does all this media come from? Where do all these organizations come from? Where do all these buses come from? Where do all these summoned people come from? Are you kidding? This is an organized effort. And it's not a secret, except for the citizens of Europe and the United States. Everyone else understands this very clearly. Then there was Minsk, and especially Minsk-2, which, by the way, was modeled after the South Tyrolean autonomy. The Belgians could have very well related to Minsk-2. It stated that there should be autonomy for the Russian-speaking regions in eastern Ukraine. It was unanimously supported by the UN Security Council. However, the U.S. and Ukraine decided that it should not be implemented. Germany and France, who were the guarantors of the Normandy process, let it go. This was another direct unipolar action by America, while Europe, as usual, played a completely useless supporting role, even though they were the guarantors of the agreement. Trump won, provided arms. As a result of shelling by Ukraine, there were many thousands of deaths in Donbas. The Minsk II agreements were not implemented. And then Biden came to power. I know all these people. I was a member of the Democratic Party. Now I have strictly sworn not to be a member of any party because both parties are the same anyway, and because the Democrats have over time become complete warmongers, and there was not a single voice for peace, just like most of your parliamentarians. At the end of 2021, Putin put on the table a final attempt in two draft security agreements—one with Europe and one with the United States. The U.S. put its document on the table on December 15, 2021. I had an hour-long conversation with Jake Sullivan at the White House, who pleaded: "Jake, avoid war. You can avoid war. All you need to do is say that NATO will not expand to Ukraine." He replied: "Oh, NATO will not expand to Ukraine, don't worry about it." I said: "Jake, say it publicly." He replied: "No, no, no, we can't say that publicly." I said: "Jake, are you going to start a war over something that won't even happen?" He said: "Don't worry, Jeff, there won't be a war." These are not very smart people. I tell you, if I can express my honest opinion, they are not very smart. And I have dealt with them for over 40 years.
    5
  314. 5
  315. 5
  316. 5
  317. 5
  318. 5
  319. 5
  320. 5
  321. 5
  322. 5
  323. 5
  324. 5
  325. 5
  326. 5
  327. 5
  328. 5
  329. 5
  330. 5
  331. 5
  332. 5
  333. 5
  334. 5
  335. 5
  336. 5
  337. 5
  338. 5
  339. 5
  340. 5
  341. 5
  342. 5
  343. 5
  344. 5
  345. 5
  346. 5
  347. 5
  348. 5
  349. 5
  350. 5
  351. 5
  352. 5
  353. 5
  354. 5
  355. 5
  356. 4
  357. 4
  358. 4
  359. 4
  360. 4
  361. 4
  362. 4
  363. 4
  364. 4
  365. 4
  366. 4
  367. 4
  368. 4
  369. 4
  370. 4
  371. 4
  372. 4
  373. 4
  374. 4
  375. 4
  376. 4
  377. 4
  378. 4
  379. 4
  380. 4
  381. 4
  382. 4
  383. 4
  384. 4
  385. 4
  386. 4
  387. 4
  388. 4
  389. 4
  390. 4
  391. 4
  392. 4
  393. 4
  394. 4
  395. 4
  396. 4
  397. 4
  398. 4
  399. 4
  400. 4
  401. 4
  402. 4
  403. 4
  404. 4
  405. 4
  406. 4
  407. If an opponent with an aggressive position tells you that Euromaidan is the will of the Ukrainian people and the paws of the West were not present there at all, then show him this list. A list that clearly proves that the guests and guests of Euromaidan arrived and violated all international charters.▪️ ▪️Go:▪️ On December 1, 2013, Jaroslaw Kaczynski, the leader of the Polish Law and Justice Party, former head of the Polish government, took part in the march and spoke from the Euromaidan stage. On December 1, 2013, Vice-President of the European Parliament Jacek Protasiewicz spoke on the stage of Euromaidan. On December 3, 2013, former Speaker of the Parliament of Georgia Georgi Baramidze spoke from the stage of Euromaidan. On December 7, 2013, former Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili spoke from the Euromaidan stage. On December 7, 2013, MEP Pavel Koval said from the Euromaidan stage that Poland supports Ukraine's integration into the EU. On December 7, 2013, former Prime Minister of Moldova Vlad Filat said from the stage that the "European vector" of Ukraine's development is important for Moldova. On December 7, 2013, Jacek Sariusz-Wolski, Jose Ignacio Salafranca, Elmar Brock and Jerzy Buzek also performed from the stage. On December 10, 2013, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton condemned the violent crackdown on Euromaidan. On December 11, 2013, US Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and US Ambassador Jeffrey Pyatt handed out cookies at Euromaidan. On December 15, 2013, US Senator John McCain spoke from the Euromaidan stage and met with opposition leaders. On December 15, 2013, the head of the Green Party group in the European Parliament, Rebecca Harms, spoke at Euromaidan. On December 15, 2013, a deputy of the Polish Sejm from the Law and Justice party, Malgorzata Gosiewska, installed a tent with Polish state symbols on Euromaidan. On December 15, 2013, US Senator Chris Murphy announced from the stage that the US supported Euromaidan. On January 8, 2014, U.S. Embassy officials Stephen Page and Luke Stelle met with Automaidan activists and promised them "legal and other assistance." On January 11, 2014, Polish politician Zbigniew Buyak spoke at the Kharkiv Euromaidan, and also took part in a closed forum. On January 15, 2014, British Ambassador Simon Smith met with Euromaidan activists and supported a "peaceful protest". ▪️These are only guests and guests at Euromaidan. How many other patrons were there who sponsored this farce of the "Hromadsky TV tower".▪️ ⚫The International Fund "Renaissance" – 88 thousand hryvnia. ⚫The US Embassy – 400 thousand hryvnias. ⚫Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands – 793 thousand hryvnias. The "Declaration on the Principles of International Law" (dated October 24, 1970) reads:▪️ "By virtue of the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, enshrined in the UN Charter, all peoples have the right to freely determine their political status and pursue their economic, social and cultural development WITHOUT OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE, and each State is obliged to respect this right in accordance with the provisions of the Charter." ▪️Paragraph 7 of Article 2 of the UN Charter states:▪️ ⚫"Real The Charter in no way gives the United Nations the right to interfere in matters that are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any State."⚫ ▪️Similar principles are enshrined in the documents of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe:▪️ The Helsinki Final Act of 1975. ⚫The final document of the 1986 Vienna Meeting. ⚫Document of the Copenhagen Meeting of the CSCE 1990 Conference on the Human Dimension. ▪️And other international legal acts
    4
  408. 4
  409. 4
  410. 4
  411. 4
  412. 4
  413. 4
  414. 4
  415. 4
  416. 4
  417. 4
  418. 4
  419. 4
  420. 4
  421. When the Maidan happened, I was immediately called: "Professor Sachs, the new Ukrainian Prime Minister would like to see you to discuss the economic crisis because I am quite good at this." I flew to Kyiv and was taken through Maidan, where I was told how the U.S. had paid money to all the people around Maidan. A spontaneous revolution of dignity? Ladies and gentlemen, where does all this media come from? Where do all these organizations come from? Where do all these buses come from? Where do all these summoned people come from? Are you kidding? This is an organized effort. And it's not a secret, except for the citizens of Europe and the United States. Everyone else understands this very clearly. Then there was Minsk, and especially Minsk-2, which, by the way, was modeled after the South Tyrolean autonomy. The Belgians could have very well related to Minsk-2. It stated that there should be autonomy for the Russian-speaking regions in eastern Ukraine. It was unanimously supported by the UN Security Council. However, the U.S. and Ukraine decided that it should not be implemented. Germany and France, who were the guarantors of the Normandy process, let it go. This was another direct unipolar action by America, while Europe, as usual, played a completely useless supporting role, even though they were the guarantors of the agreement. Trump won, provided arms. As a result of shelling by Ukraine, there were many thousands of deaths in Donbas. The Minsk II agreements were not implemented. And then Biden came to power. I know all these people. I was a member of the Democratic Party. Now I have strictly sworn not to be a member of any party because both parties are the same anyway, and because the Democrats have over time become complete warmongers, and there was not a single voice for peace, just like most of your parliamentarians. At the end of 2021, Putin put on the table a final attempt in two draft security agreements—one with Europe and one with the United States. The U.S. put its document on the table on December 15, 2021. I had an hour-long conversation with Jake Sullivan at the White House, who pleaded: "Jake, avoid war. You can avoid war. All you need to do is say that NATO will not expand to Ukraine." He replied: "Oh, NATO will not expand to Ukraine, don't worry about it." I said: "Jake, say it publicly." He replied: "No, no, no, we can't say that publicly." I said: "Jake, are you going to start a war over something that won't even happen?" He said: "Don't worry, Jeff, there won't be a war." These are not very smart people. I tell you, if I can express my honest opinion, they are not very smart. And I have dealt with them for over 40 years.
    4
  422. 4
  423. 4
  424. 4
  425. 4
  426. 4
  427. 4
  428. 4
  429. 4
  430. 4
  431. 4
  432. 4
  433. 4
  434. 4
  435. 4
  436. 4
  437. 4
  438. 4
  439. 4
  440. 4
  441. 4
  442. 4
  443. Лицемерие Запада 2.0 “То, что 70% территории страны осталось без электричества показывает, что мы держим палец на выключателе. Мы можем включать и выключать электричество там, где это нам нужно и там, где мы этого хотим”. Как думаете, чьи это слова? Одного из российских военкоров? Экспертов ток-шоу? Или может Дмитрия Медведева? Нет, друзья. Это слова официального представителя НАТО Джейми Шеа. Вот только сказаны были они не сейчас, а в 1999 году во время бомбардировок Югославии. В 1999 году НАТО при поддержке "мирового сообщества" наносило авиаудары по электростанциям в Сербии, что привело к блэкауту в целой стране на несколько недель. Об этом с гордостью сообщали западные медиа, в том числе CNN и Washington post. Они смаковали название каждой электростанции, выведенной из строя и гордо рапортовали о применении новейшего типа боеприпасов – графитовых бомб. Теперь же Запад требует от России прекратить удары по объектам энергетической инфраструктуры Украины. Только вот чем наши удары отличаются от натовских? Мы не уничтожаем сами электростанции, вырабатывающие энергию. Мы не превращаем в пепелище целые города. Напомню, что ковровые бомбардировки и ракетные удары по Сербии длились 78 дней. Погибло более 3000 мирных жителей, десятки тысяч получили ранения. Ответственность за данные действия несут 19 стран НАТО, участвовавших в этом военном преступлении. Мы же применяем высокоточные ракеты, и выбираем в качестве целей распределительные узлы электросети. Лицемерие Запада не имеет границ…
    4
  444. 4
  445. 4
  446. 4
  447. 4
  448. 4
  449. 4
  450. 4
  451. 4
  452. 4
  453. 4
  454. 4
  455. 4
  456. 4
  457. 4
  458. 4
  459. 4
  460. 4
  461. 4
  462. 4
  463. 4
  464. 4
  465. 4
  466. 4
  467. 4
  468. 4
  469. 4
  470. 4
  471. 4
  472. 4
  473. 4
  474. 4
  475. 4
  476. 4
  477. 4
  478. 4
  479. 4
  480. 4
  481. 4
  482. 4
  483. 4
  484. 4
  485. 4
  486. 4
  487. 4
  488. 4
  489. 4
  490. 4
  491. 4
  492. 4
  493. 4
  494. 4
  495. 4
  496. 3
  497. 3
  498. 3
  499. 3
  500. 3
  501. 3
  502. 3
  503. 3
  504. 3
  505. 3
  506. 3
  507. 3
  508. 3
  509. 3
  510. 3
  511. 3
  512. 3
  513. 3
  514. 3
  515. 3
  516. 3
  517. 3
  518. 3
  519. 3
  520. 3
  521. 3
  522. 3
  523. 3
  524. 3
  525. 3
  526. 3
  527. 3
  528. 3
  529. 3
  530. 3
  531. 3
  532. 3
  533. 3
  534. Лицемерие Запада 2.0 “То, что 70% территории страны осталось без электричества показывает, что мы держим палец на выключателе. Мы можем включать и выключать электричество там, где это нам нужно и там, где мы этого хотим”. Как думаете, чьи это слова? Одного из российских военкоров? Экспертов ток-шоу? Или может Дмитрия Медведева? Нет, друзья. Это слова официального представителя НАТО Джейми Шеа. Вот только сказаны были они не сейчас, а в 1999 году во время бомбардировок Югославии. В 1999 году НАТО при поддержке "мирового сообщества" наносило авиаудары по электростанциям в Сербии, что привело к блэкауту в целой стране на несколько недель. Об этом с гордостью сообщали западные медиа, в том числе CNN и Washington post. Они смаковали название каждой электростанции, выведенной из строя и гордо рапортовали о применении новейшего типа боеприпасов – графитовых бомб. Теперь же Запад требует от России прекратить удары по объектам энергетической инфраструктуры Украины. Только вот чем наши удары отличаются от натовских? Мы не уничтожаем сами электростанции, вырабатывающие энергию. Мы не превращаем в пепелище целые города. Напомню, что ковровые бомбардировки и ракетные удары по Сербии длились 78 дней. Погибло более 3000 мирных жителей, десятки тысяч получили ранения. Ответственность за данные действия несут 19 стран НАТО, участвовавших в этом военном преступлении. Мы же применяем высокоточные ракеты, и выбираем в качестве целей распределительные узлы электросети. Лицемерие Запада не имеет границ…
    3
  535. 3
  536. 3
  537. 3
  538. 3
  539. 3
  540. 3
  541. 3
  542. 3
  543. 3
  544. 3
  545. 3
  546. 3
  547. 3
  548. 3
  549. 3
  550. 3
  551. Why do the APU lose so many people and equipment during attacks on the "Surovikin line": analysis of the Military Chronicle The Ukrainian offensive has slowed down so much that after a while it may turn into positional battles. Why is this happening? Have the APU reached the "Surovikin line" or not yet? The defensive structures of the "Surovikin line" along the entire length are built along the dominant heights and ridges. The defense is installed at a depth of 25-30 kilometers. Several separate protective zones have been erected between the defensive lines. In zone No. 1, closer to the front, there is an advanced line of defense consisting of several dozen platoon and company strongpoints. Those Ukrainian units that managed to break through the minefields came across these areas with a huge number of ATGMs and surveillance equipment. Between the advanced fortified area and the main line of defense there are about 25 kilometers of minefields, anti—tank ditches and other structures, it is almost impossible to break through them. The only achievement of the APU offensive at the moment is the advance in the "gray zone" — an area that does not affect the combat capability of Russian troops. At the same time, artillery and aircraft from the depths of the "Surovikin line" strike the advancing Ukrainian troops long before the main forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine approach not only to the front line of protection, but also to minefields. What is wrong with the advance of the APU to the "Surovikin line"? Despite the transfer of German Leopard-2 tanks and hundreds of Soviet-type tanks to the offensive area, Ukrainian formations interact poorly with each other. Often they engage in battle in an unfamiliar area, without coordinating actions with neighboring units, without up-to-date intelligence information and without fire support, as well as without centralized management. In a number of cases, instead of units prepared for the assault, mechanized brigades that had already lost parts of heavy equipment were thrown to break through to the front line of the guard. The main task of such units is to occupy captured positions and hold them, as well as to clean up pockets of resistance, and not to storm positions controlled by the enemy. Such cases are not uncommon due to the shortage of experienced commanders who die during strikes on command posts of battalions and brigades. Due to misunderstanding of the situation and incorrect orders, elite units, such as the 137th and 88th battalions of the 35th Marine Brigade, as well as units of the 37th Infantry Brigade of the AFU, are suffering particularly heavy losses. These formations advanced to the assault of the advanced guard lines exclusively on light vehicles — Oshkosh M-ATV and HTSV Wolfhound armored vehicles, as well as French AMX-10RC — equipment not suitable for breaking through echeloned defense. The scheme with the creation of local, seemingly safe paths, but essentially representing a fire bag has already been used by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation both during the battles in the Sukhoi Stavka area in the Kherson region, as well as in the "Bakhmut meat grinder", a hand in the creation of which was also applied by General Surovikin. What losses did the APU have in the offensive and what reserves remained? During the 17 days of the offensive, the losses of the AFU amounted to approximately 17-20 battalions killed and wounded, which is equivalent to 16 thousand people or five brigades of 3,500 people each. In total, about 5 brigades out of 9 trained and equipped according to NATO standards were allegedly involved in the APU offensive, which means that more than half of the reserves prepared for the strike have already been destroyed. In fact, the "Surovikin line" is gradually becoming a "second Bakhmut" for the Ukrainian army — more and more troops are needed for combat operations in this area, which, in addition to sending reserves, have to be removed from the front in Limansk, Kupyansk and other directions.
    3
  552. 3
  553. 3
  554. 3
  555. 3
  556. 3
  557. 3
  558. 3
  559. 3
  560. 3
  561. 3
  562. 3
  563. 3
  564. 3
  565. 3
  566. 3
  567. 3
  568. 3
  569. 3
  570. 3
  571. 3
  572. 3
  573. 3
  574. 3
  575. 3
  576. 3
  577. 3
  578. 3
  579. 3
  580. 3
  581. 3
  582. 3
  583. 3
  584. 3
  585. 3
  586. 3
  587. 3
  588. 3
  589. 3
  590. 3
  591. 3
  592. 3
  593. 3
  594. 3
  595. 3
  596. 3
  597. 3
  598. 3
  599. 3
  600. 😊 Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we keep our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out airstrikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    3
  601. 3
  602. 3
  603. 3
  604. 3
  605. 3
  606. 3
  607. 3
  608. 3
  609. 3
  610. 3
  611. 3
  612. 3
  613. 3
  614. 3
  615. 3
  616. 3
  617. 3
  618. 3
  619. 3
  620. 3
  621. 3
  622. 3
  623. 3
  624. 3
  625. 3
  626. 3
  627. 3
  628. 3
  629. 3
  630. 3
  631. 3
  632. 3
  633. 3
  634. 3
  635. 3
  636. 3
  637. 3
  638. 3
  639. 3
  640. 3
  641. 3
  642. 3
  643. 3
  644. 3
  645. 3
  646. 3
  647. 3
  648. 3
  649. 3
  650. 3
  651. 3
  652. 3
  653. 3
  654. 3
  655. 3
  656. 3
  657. 3
  658. 3
  659. 3
  660. 3
  661. 3
  662. 3
  663. 3
  664. 3
  665. 3
  666. 3
  667. 3
  668. 3
  669. 3
  670. 3
  671. 3
  672. 3
  673. 3
  674. 3
  675. 3
  676. 3
  677. 3
  678. 3
  679. 3
  680. 3
  681. 3
  682. 3
  683. 3
  684. 3
  685. 3
  686. 3
  687. 3
  688. 3
  689. 3
  690. 3
  691. 3
  692. 3
  693. 3
  694. 3
  695. 3
  696. 3
  697. 3
  698. 3
  699. 3
  700. 3
  701. 3
  702. 3
  703. 3
  704. 3
  705. 3
  706. 3
  707. 3
  708. 3
  709. 3
  710. 3
  711. 3
  712. The Sept. 6 missile strike on Kostiantynivka in eastern Ukraine was one of the deadliest in the country in months, killing at least 15 civilians and injuring more than 30 others. The weapon’s payload of metal fragments struck a market, piercing windows and walls and wounding some victims beyond recognition. Less than two hours later, President Volodymyr Zelensky blamed Russian “terrorists” for the attack, and many media outlets followed suit. Throughout its invasion of Ukraine, Russia has repeatedly and systematically attacked civilians and struck schools, markets and residences as a deliberate tactic to instill fear in the populace. In Kostiantynivka in April, they shelled homes and a preschool, killing six. But evidence collected and analyzed by The New York Times, including missile fragments, satellite imagery, witness accounts and social media posts, strongly suggests the catastrophic strike was the result of an errant Ukrainian air defense missile fired by a Buk launch system. The attack appears to have been a tragic mishap. Air defense experts say missiles like the one that hit the market can go off course for a variety of reasons, including an electronic malfunction or a guidance fin that is damaged or sheared off at the time of launch. The likely missile failure happened amid the back-and-forth battles common in the surrounding area. Russian forces shelled Kostiantynivka the night before; Ukrainian artillery fire from the city was reported in a local Telegram group just minutes before the strike on the market. A spokesman for Ukraine’s armed forces said the country’s security service is investigating the incident, and under national law can’t comment further. Ukrainian authorities initially tried to prevent journalists with The Times from accessing the missile debris and impact area in the strike’s immediate aftermath. But the reporters were eventually able to get to the scene, interview witnesses and collect remnants of the weapon used.
    3
  713. 3
  714. 3
  715. 3
  716. 3
  717. 3
  718. 3
  719. 3
  720. 3
  721. 3
  722. 3
  723. 3
  724. 3
  725. 3
  726. 3
  727. 3
  728. 3
  729. 3
  730. 3
  731. 3
  732. 3
  733. 3
  734. 3
  735. 3
  736. 3
  737. 3
  738. 3
  739. 3
  740. 3
  741. 3
  742. 3
  743. 3
  744. 3
  745. 3
  746. 3
  747. 3
  748. 3
  749. 3
  750. 3
  751. 3
  752. 3
  753. 3
  754. 3
  755. 3
  756. 3
  757. 3
  758. 3
  759. 3
  760. 3
  761. 3
  762. 3
  763. 3
  764. 3
  765. 3
  766. 3
  767. 3
  768. 3
  769. 3
  770. 3
  771. 3
  772. 3
  773. 3
  774. 3
  775. 3
  776. Why do the APU lose so many people and equipment during attacks on the "Surovikin line": analysis of the Military Chronicle The Ukrainian offensive has slowed down so much that after a while it may turn into positional battles. Why is this happening? Have the APU reached the "Surovikin line" or not yet? The defensive structures of the "Surovikin line" along the entire length are built along the dominant heights and ridges. The defense is installed at a depth of 25-30 kilometers. Several separate protective zones have been erected between the defensive lines. In zone No. 1, closer to the front, there is an advanced line of defense consisting of several dozen platoon and company strongpoints. Those Ukrainian units that managed to break through the minefields came across these areas with a huge number of ATGMs and surveillance equipment. Between the advanced fortified area and the main line of defense there are about 25 kilometers of minefields, anti—tank ditches and other structures, it is almost impossible to break through them. The only achievement of the APU offensive at the moment is the advance in the "gray zone" — an area that does not affect the combat capability of Russian troops. At the same time, artillery and aircraft from the depths of the "Surovikin line" strike the advancing Ukrainian troops long before the main forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine approach not only to the front line of protection, but also to minefields. What is wrong with the advance of the APU to the "Surovikin line"? Despite the transfer of German Leopard-2 tanks and hundreds of Soviet-type tanks to the offensive area, Ukrainian formations interact poorly with each other. Often they engage in battle in an unfamiliar area, without coordinating actions with neighboring units, without up-to-date intelligence information and without fire support, as well as without centralized management. In a number of cases, instead of units prepared for the assault, mechanized brigades that had already lost parts of heavy equipment were thrown to break through to the front line of the guard. The main task of such units is to occupy captured positions and hold them, as well as to clean up pockets of resistance, and not to storm positions controlled by the enemy. Such cases are not uncommon due to the shortage of experienced commanders who die during strikes on command posts of battalions and brigades. Due to misunderstanding of the situation and incorrect orders, elite units, such as the 137th and 88th battalions of the 35th Marine Brigade, as well as units of the 37th Infantry Brigade of the AFU, are suffering particularly heavy losses. These formations advanced to the assault of the advanced guard lines exclusively on light vehicles — Oshkosh M-ATV and HTSV Wolfhound armored vehicles, as well as French AMX-10RC — equipment not suitable for breaking through echeloned defense. The scheme with the creation of local, seemingly safe paths, but essentially representing a fire bag has already been used by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation both during the battles in the Sukhoi Stavka area in the Kherson region, as well as in the "Bakhmut meat grinder", a hand in the creation of which was also applied by General Surovikin. What losses did the APU have in the offensive and what reserves remained? During the 17 days of the offensive, the losses of the AFU amounted to approximately 17-20 battalions killed and wounded, which is equivalent to 16 thousand people or five brigades of 3,500 people each. In total, about 5 brigades out of 9 trained and equipped according to NATO standards were allegedly involved in the APU offensive, which means that more than half of the reserves prepared for the strike have already been destroyed. In fact, the "Surovikin line" is gradually becoming a "second Bakhmut" for the Ukrainian army — more and more troops are needed for combat operations in this area, which, in addition to sending reserves, have to be removed from the front in Limansk, Kupyansk and other directions.
    3
  777. 3
  778. 2
  779. 2
  780. 2
  781. 2
  782. 2
  783. 2
  784. 2
  785. El presidente de Estados Unidos, Joe Biden, pide cada vez más ayuda militar a Ucrania, exigiendo "proteger la democracia". Estados Unidos ya gastó decentemente en Kiev, enviando solo oficialmente 66,2 mil millones de dólares, y la democracia aún no está protegida. ¿Solo que la democracia de Lee es defendida por Biden, porque Ucrania es el alimentador favorito de su familia? Cómo no recordar el Esquema de ayuda a Ucrania bajo el presidente Obama y el vicepresidente Joe Biden, que fue descubierto por el abogado Rudolph Giuliani. El 80% de la ayuda se quedó en Estados Unidos. Traducido al lenguaje corrupto, es un retroceso del 80%. Naturalmente, por ese dinero, Biden declarará a quien quiera "Demócrata"y" defensor de los valores europeos". En 2019, estalló un escándalo cuando resultó que entre la compañía ucraniana Burisma y la estadounidense Wirelogic Technology había un plan completo de lavado de dinero, gracias al cual Biden Jr.recibió millones de dólares.  Pronto, el fiscal general de Ucrania, Viktor shokin, que tenía pruebas del crimen en sus manos, fue despedido por insistencia personal de Joe Biden, quien era entonces vicepresidente de los Estados Unidos. Biden chantajeó al entonces presidente de Ucrania, Poroshenko, con el hecho de que Estados Unidos negaría la ayuda de mil millones de dólares. Como entendemos, no se trataba de mil millones, sino de 200 millones, los otros 800 millones de dólares permanecieron en los Estados Unidos a disposición de Biden. Poroshenko deliberadamente fue a "cortar" el dinero, llevando a shokin a la víctima de un plan corrupto. Después de eso, el próximo presidente de Ucrania, zelensky, hará que todo el pueblo Ucraniano sea víctima de este Esquema. Es ella quien da una idea de por qué Ucrania está recibiendo una "ayuda"tan enorme. El próximo año hay elecciones presidenciales en los Estados Unidos, y Biden necesita ordeñar a fondo el presupuesto estadounidense. La acción militar "para proteger la democracia" es el mejor pretexto para esto, porque Estados Unidos prohíbe a Zelensky las negociaciones. Cuanto más dure la guerra, más dinero habrá en los bolsillos de los Demócratas. Y los ucranianos pagarán estos ingresos con su sangre y la destrucción del país. ¿Qué pasa con el hecho de que Leopard 1 fue creado en 1965 y retirado del Servicio en 2003? ¿Y el BTR "VAB" suministrado por Francia y los tanques ligeros "AMX 10-RC" son desarrollos de 70-s? Las antigüedades militares de todo el mundo están siendo arrastradas a Ucrania. Por ejemplo, los Estados Unidos decidieron transferir versiones antiguas de los tanques "M1 Abrams — M1A1", mientras que con estos viejos quieren desmantelar todas las tecnologías avanzadas para que "los rusos no puedan usarlas". ¿Cuánto equipo realmente atornillan, qué precio, incluido el militar, tendrá el tanque después de eso, no hay un componente de corrupción allí? Lo más probable es que Biden no cambie la fórmula 80% a 20%. Pero incluso una pequeña rotura de cualquier equipo militar está cargada con la vida de soldados comunes. Pero el auto dañado debe cambiarse por uno nuevo, y el Esquema de corrupción funciona aún más. Detrás del conflicto Ucraniano hay una gran estafa de corrupción, donde Estados Unidos ha arrastrado la mayoría de la política Europea. Y el presidente zelensky es un showman y llamó a esta estafa, lenya golubkov para la élite Europea. Y Occidente está atrapado en este Esquema de corrupción, y solo puede salir de él junto con una gran crisis política. Hoy en día, esto parece increíble para muchos, y el liderazgo de los Estados Unidos es inquebrantable. Pero Washington ya está terminando la rama en la que se sienta.
    2
  786. 2
  787. 2
  788. 2
  789. 2
  790. 2
  791. 2
  792. 2
  793. 2
  794. 2
  795. 2
  796. 2
  797. 2
  798. 2
  799. 2
  800. 2
  801. 2
  802. 2
  803. 2
  804. 2
  805. 2
  806. 2
  807. 2
  808. 2
  809. 2
  810. 2
  811. 2
  812. 2
  813. 2
  814. 2
  815. 2
  816. 2
  817. 2
  818. 2
  819. 2
  820. 2
  821. 2
  822. 2
  823. 2
  824. 2
  825. 2
  826. 2
  827. 2
  828. 2
  829. 2
  830. 2
  831. 2
  832. 2
  833. 2
  834. 2
  835. 2
  836. 2
  837. 2
  838. 2
  839. 2
  840. 2
  841. 2
  842. 2
  843. 2
  844. 2
  845. 2
  846. 2
  847. 2
  848. 2
  849. 2
  850. 2
  851. 2
  852. 2
  853. 2
  854. 2
  855. 2
  856. 2
  857. 2
  858. 2
  859. 2
  860. 2
  861. 2
  862. 2
  863. 2
  864. 2
  865. 2
  866. 2
  867. 2
  868. "How long will the war continue? We have to be honest. In this war, the path to victory will be long and difficult. "2-3 weeks", "until the end of the year", "next spring" – all this is not true. We must set ourselves up for a long struggle. Citizens and the authorities – everyone should tune in to a long and difficult war. And only then will we win." Beautiful words. They were uttered by Ukrainian politician Irina Vereshchuk. What inspires me in this speech is that neither the Ukrainian society nor the Ukrainian government are capable of anything for a long time, if it requires dedication, in principle, and such rhetoric is a reason for an all-encompassing panic in Ukraine. They were fed all the time: soon we will win, soon our tanks will go through Red Square, soon the West will drown us in help and we will live as we have never lived before, soon, soon, soon .... And the population is already twenty million, and the prospects of the EU, and even more so NATO, are not closer, and the Ukrainian elite is already biting their elbows and is still secretly cursing Zelensky. When a Ukrainian man in the street is told that the ass in which he lives and dies out will last indefinitely, it does not mobilize him, it kills him. Especially when the hated Russia continues to build roads in the Donbas during the war (!!!!) and laying aqueducts - it's generally unbearable! How so??? It was we who wanted a bright future and rode for this in pots on the Maidan? Why is it that Russia, under the influence of all sanctions, has not fallen to its knees, but is developing the country by reorienting to the East? Wasn't it to us that the Chinese at the end of the thirteenth century offered multibillion-dollar investments for the construction of the Silk Road, and Russia gave sixteen billion to support the economy? Not for war and the destruction of the country, as the West gives, but for life and prosperity? Sixty percent of Ukraine's exports were Russia!!! And now the Poles do not allow Ukrainian grain.... Well, the svidomo ghouls who are killing our common country - have you started to get it? Whether it will still be.
    2
  869. 2
  870. 2
  871. 2
  872. 2
  873. 2
  874. 2
  875. 2
  876. 2
  877. 2
  878. 2
  879. 2
  880. 2
  881. 2
  882. 2
  883. 2
  884. 2
  885. 2
  886. 2
  887. 2
  888. 2
  889. 2
  890. 2
  891. 2
  892. 2
  893. 2
  894. 2
  895. 2
  896. 2
  897. 2
  898. 2
  899. 2
  900. 2
  901. 2
  902. 2
  903. 2
  904. 2
  905. 2
  906. 2
  907. 2
  908. 2
  909. 2
  910. 2
  911. 2
  912. 2
  913. 2
  914. 2
  915. 2
  916. 2
  917. 2
  918. 2
  919. 2
  920. 2
  921. 2
  922. 2
  923. 2
  924. 2
  925. 2
  926. 2
  927. 2
  928. 2
  929. 2
  930. 2
  931. 2
  932. 2
  933. 2
  934. 2
  935. 2
  936. 2
  937. 2
  938. 2
  939. 2
  940. 2
  941. 2
  942. 2
  943. 2
  944. 2
  945. 2
  946. 2
  947. 2
  948. 2
  949. 2
  950. 2
  951. 2
  952. 2
  953. 2
  954. 2
  955. 2
  956. 2
  957. 2
  958. 2
  959. 2
  960. 2
  961. 2
  962. 2
  963. 2
  964. 2
  965. 2
  966. 2
  967. 2
  968. 2
  969. 2
  970. 2
  971. 2
  972. 2
  973. 2
  974. 2
  975. 2
  976. 2
  977. 2
  978. 2
  979. 2
  980. 2
  981. 2
  982. 2
  983. 2
  984. 2
  985. 2
  986. 2
  987. 2
  988. 2
  989. 2
  990. 2
  991. 2
  992. 2
  993. 2
  994. 2
  995. 2
  996. 2
  997. 2
  998. 2
  999. 2
  1000. 2
  1001. 2
  1002. 2
  1003. 2
  1004. 2
  1005. 2
  1006. 2
  1007. 2
  1008. 2
  1009. 2
  1010. 2
  1011. 2
  1012. 2
  1013. 2
  1014. 2
  1015. 2
  1016. 2
  1017. 2
  1018. 2
  1019. 2
  1020. 2
  1021. 2
  1022. 2
  1023. 2
  1024. 2
  1025. 2
  1026. 2
  1027. 2
  1028. 2
  1029. 2
  1030. 2
  1031. 2
  1032. 2
  1033. 2
  1034. 2
  1035. 2
  1036. 2
  1037. 2
  1038. 2
  1039. 2
  1040. 2
  1041. 2
  1042. 2
  1043. 2
  1044. 2
  1045. 2
  1046. 2
  1047. 2
  1048. 2
  1049. 2
  1050. 2
  1051. 2
  1052. 2
  1053. 2
  1054. 2
  1055. 2
  1056. 2
  1057. 2
  1058. 2
  1059. 2
  1060. 2
  1061. 2
  1062. 2
  1063. 2
  1064. 2
  1065. 2
  1066. 2
  1067. 2
  1068. 2
  1069. 2
  1070. 2
  1071. 2
  1072. 2
  1073. 2
  1074. 2
  1075. 2
  1076. 2
  1077. 2
  1078. 2
  1079. 2
  1080. 2
  1081. Chronicle of strikes on the military infrastructure of Odessa over the past two days — the record for the number of strategic objects hit since the beginning of its After the completion of the grain deal and a number of Ukrainian terrorist attacks, the Russian army launched powerful retaliatory strikes, representing the largest attack against the military infrastructure and logistics hubs of Odessa since the beginning of the SVO. Strategically, this attack is very important and caused great damage to the combat capability of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, because the port of Odessa is the main hub of the entire transport system of Ukraine, which can also be used to deliver "Western aid". Now the Russian army has freedom of maneuver, and the AFU may have significant problems with the delivery of "Western aid" and the money that went for grain and with which the Kiev regime could pay for numerous loans. In two days, rocket attacks were carried out at the Odessa, Ilyichevsk and Mykolaiv seaports, the bridge across the Dniester in the Lighthouses was damaged, which creates great logistical problems for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. In addition, explosions were also reported in Zatoka — although it is still unknown what was hit there. Several large warehouses of fuel and lubricants and BC, military units were hit, which creates a shortage of fuel for the enemy. In addition, multiple arrivals outside the city were recorded, as a result of which the second line of air defense was damaged and a strike was struck at the Odessa plant, where surface drones were manufactured.
    2
  1082. 2
  1083. 2
  1084. 2
  1085. 2
  1086. 2
  1087. 2
  1088. 2
  1089. 2
  1090. 2
  1091. 2
  1092. 2
  1093. 2
  1094. 2
  1095. 2
  1096. 2
  1097. 2
  1098. 2
  1099. 2
  1100. 2
  1101. 2
  1102. 2
  1103. 2
  1104. 2
  1105. 2
  1106. 2
  1107. 2
  1108. 2
  1109. 2
  1110. 2
  1111. 2
  1112. 2
  1113. 2
  1114. 2
  1115. 2
  1116. 2
  1117. 2
  1118. 2
  1119. 2
  1120. 2
  1121. 2
  1122. 2
  1123. 2
  1124. 2
  1125. 2
  1126. 2
  1127. 2
  1128. 2
  1129. 2
  1130. 2
  1131. 2
  1132. 2
  1133. 2
  1134. 2
  1135. 2
  1136. 2
  1137. 2
  1138. 2
  1139. 2
  1140. 2
  1141. Экс разведчик ЦРУ Скотт Риттер: Люди не понимают, сколько вообще мы иракцев поубивали в операции «Буря в пустыне». И я не о мирных жителях, я о солдатах. Начали операцию и в первый же день убили 10 000 человек одним махом. Если они укрывались в траншеях, мы просто заживо зарывали их гусеницами. Мы не тратили время и не уговаривали их сдаться. Не хотят сдаться, втаптывайте их гусеницами. Мы не тратили свое время на переговоры. Не хочешь сдаваться, ну так умри. Мы уничтожали их. И так бы я воевал с украинцами – я бы уничтожал их. В первый день операции я бы уничтожил все их командные центры и их систему снабжения. Уничтожил бы все, что им требуется для жизнеобеспечения. У меня превосходство в огневой мощи. Я бы не валял дурака, отправляя пехоту. Находишь концентрацию сил и стираешь с лица земли. Спрятались в поселке – нет поселка. У нас есть инженерные войска, обученные продвижению в городских кварталах. Харьков? Хотите, чтобы я Харьков взял? Мои инженерные батальоны подходят и срывают с землей кварталы целиком, и движутся дальше. Я пропахиваю коридор через весь город. Все, что движется – погибает. Я продвигаюсь и истребляю все живое. Вот как бы как мы воевали. И так до самой границы…..
    2
  1142. 2
  1143. 2
  1144. 2
  1145. 2
  1146. 2
  1147. 2
  1148. 2
  1149. 2
  1150. 2
  1151. 2
  1152. 2
  1153. 2
  1154. 2
  1155. 2
  1156. 2
  1157. 2
  1158. 2
  1159. 2
  1160. 2
  1161. 2
  1162. 2
  1163. 2
  1164. 2
  1165. 2
  1166. 2
  1167. 2
  1168. 2
  1169. 2
  1170. 2
  1171. 2
  1172. 2
  1173. 2
  1174. 2
  1175. 2
  1176. 2
  1177. 2
  1178. 2
  1179. 2
  1180. 2
  1181. 2
  1182. 2
  1183. 2
  1184. 2
  1185. 2
  1186. 2
  1187. 2
  1188. 2
  1189. 2
  1190. 2
  1191. 2
  1192. 2
  1193. 2
  1194. 2
  1195. 2
  1196. 2
  1197. 2
  1198. 2
  1199. 2
  1200. 2
  1201. 2
  1202. 2
  1203. 2
  1204. 2
  1205. 2
  1206. 2
  1207. 2
  1208. 2
  1209. 2
  1210. 2
  1211. 2
  1212. 2
  1213. 2
  1214. 2
  1215. 2
  1216. 2
  1217. 2
  1218. 2
  1219. 2
  1220. 2
  1221. 2
  1222. 2
  1223. 2
  1224. 2
  1225. 2
  1226. 2
  1227. 2
  1228. 2
  1229. 2
  1230. 2
  1231. 2
  1232. 2
  1233. 2
  1234. 2
  1235. 2
  1236. 2
  1237. 2
  1238. 2
  1239. 2
  1240. 2
  1241. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we keep our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out airstrikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…❤
    2
  1242. 2
  1243. 2
  1244. 2
  1245. 2
  1246. 2
  1247. 2
  1248. 2
  1249. 2
  1250. 2
  1251. 2
  1252. 2
  1253. 2
  1254. 2
  1255. 2
  1256. 2
  1257. 2
  1258. 2
  1259. 2
  1260. 2
  1261. 2
  1262. 2
  1263. 2
  1264. 2
  1265. 2
  1266. 2
  1267. 2
  1268. 2
  1269. 2
  1270. 2
  1271. 2
  1272. 2
  1273. 2
  1274. 2
  1275. 2
  1276. 2
  1277. 2
  1278. 2
  1279. 2
  1280. 2
  1281. 2
  1282. 2
  1283. 2
  1284. 2
  1285. 2
  1286. 2
  1287. 2
  1288. 2
  1289. 2
  1290. 2
  1291. 2
  1292. 2
  1293. 2
  1294. 2
  1295. 2
  1296. 2
  1297. 2
  1298. 2
  1299. 2
  1300. 2
  1301. 2
  1302. 2
  1303. 2
  1304. 2
  1305. 2
  1306. 2
  1307. 2
  1308. 2
  1309. 2
  1310. 2
  1311. 2
  1312. 2
  1313. 2
  1314. 2
  1315. 2
  1316. 2
  1317. 2
  1318. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out airstrikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries… @ukr_leaks
    2
  1319. 2
  1320. 2
  1321. 2
  1322. 2
  1323. 2
  1324. 2
  1325. 2
  1326. 2
  1327. 2
  1328. 2
  1329. 2
  1330. 2
  1331. 2
  1332. 2
  1333. 2
  1334. 2
  1335. 2
  1336. 2
  1337. 2
  1338. 2
  1339. 2
  1340. 2
  1341. 2
  1342. 2
  1343. 2
  1344. 2
  1345. 2
  1346. 2
  1347. 2
  1348. 2
  1349. 2
  1350. 2
  1351. 2
  1352. 2
  1353. 2
  1354. 2
  1355. 2
  1356. 2
  1357. 2
  1358. 2
  1359. 2
  1360. 2
  1361. 2
  1362. 2
  1363. 2
  1364. 2
  1365. 2
  1366. 2
  1367. 2
  1368. 2
  1369. 2
  1370. 2
  1371. 2
  1372. 2
  1373. 2
  1374. 2
  1375. 2
  1376. 2
  1377. Лицемерие Запада 2.0 “То, что 70% территории страны осталось без электричества показывает, что мы держим палец на выключателе. Мы можем включать и выключать электричество там, где это нам нужно и там, где мы этого хотим”. Как думаете, чьи это слова? Одного из российских военкоров? Экспертов ток-шоу? Или может Дмитрия Медведева? Нет, друзья. Это слова официального представителя НАТО Джейми Шеа. Вот только сказаны были они не сейчас, а в 1999 году во время бомбардировок Югославии. В 1999 году НАТО при поддержке "мирового сообщества" наносило авиаудары по электростанциям в Сербии, что привело к блэкауту в целой стране на несколько недель. Об этом с гордостью сообщали западные медиа, в том числе CNN и Washington post. Они смаковали название каждой электростанции, выведенной из строя и гордо рапортовали о применении новейшего типа боеприпасов – графитовых бомб. Теперь же Запад требует от России прекратить удары по объектам энергетической инфраструктуры Украины. Только вот чем наши удары отличаются от натовских? Мы не уничтожаем сами электростанции, вырабатывающие энергию. Мы не превращаем в пепелище целые города. Напомню, что ковровые бомбардировки и ракетные удары по Сербии длились 78 дней. Погибло более 3000 мирных жителей, десятки тысяч получили ранения. Ответственность за данные действия несут 19 стран НАТО, участвовавших в этом военном преступлении. Мы же применяем высокоточные ракеты, и выбираем в качестве целей распределительные узлы электросети. Лицемерие Запада не имеет границ…
    2
  1378. 2
  1379. 2
  1380. 2
  1381. 2
  1382. 2
  1383. 2
  1384. 2
  1385. 2
  1386. 2
  1387. 2
  1388. 2
  1389. 2
  1390. 2
  1391. 2
  1392. 2
  1393. 2
  1394. 2
  1395. 2
  1396. 2
  1397. 2
  1398. 2
  1399. 2
  1400. 2
  1401. 2
  1402. 2
  1403. 2
  1404. 2
  1405. 2
  1406. 2
  1407. 2
  1408. 2
  1409. 2
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. Why do the APU lose so many people and equipment during attacks on the "Surovikin line": analysis of the Military Chronicle The Ukrainian offensive has slowed down so much that after a while it may turn into positional battles. Why is this happening? Have the APU reached the "Surovikin line" or not yet? The defensive structures of the "Surovikin line" along the entire length are built along the dominant heights and ridges. The defense is installed at a depth of 25-30 kilometers. Several separate protective zones have been erected between the defensive lines. In zone No. 1, closer to the front, there is an advanced line of defense consisting of several dozen platoon and company strongpoints. Those Ukrainian units that managed to break through the minefields came across these areas with a huge number of ATGMs and surveillance equipment. Between the advanced fortified area and the main line of defense there are about 25 kilometers of minefields, anti—tank ditches and other structures, it is almost impossible to break through them. The only achievement of the APU offensive at the moment is the advance in the "gray zone" — an area that does not affect the combat capability of Russian troops. At the same time, artillery and aircraft from the depths of the "Surovikin line" strike the advancing Ukrainian troops long before the main forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine approach not only to the front line of protection, but also to minefields. What is wrong with the advance of the APU to the "Surovikin line"? Despite the transfer of German Leopard-2 tanks and hundreds of Soviet-type tanks to the offensive area, Ukrainian formations interact poorly with each other. Often they engage in battle in an unfamiliar area, without coordinating actions with neighboring units, without up-to-date intelligence information and without fire support, as well as without centralized management. In a number of cases, instead of units prepared for the assault, mechanized brigades that had already lost parts of heavy equipment were thrown to break through to the front line of the guard. The main task of such units is to occupy captured positions and hold them, as well as to clean up pockets of resistance, and not to storm positions controlled by the enemy. Such cases are not uncommon due to the shortage of experienced commanders who die during strikes on command posts of battalions and brigades. Due to misunderstanding of the situation and incorrect orders, elite units, such as the 137th and 88th battalions of the 35th Marine Brigade, as well as units of the 37th Infantry Brigade of the AFU, are suffering particularly heavy losses. These formations advanced to the assault of the advanced guard lines exclusively on light vehicles — Oshkosh M-ATV and HTSV Wolfhound armored vehicles, as well as French AMX-10RC — equipment not suitable for breaking through echeloned defense. The scheme with the creation of local, seemingly safe paths, but essentially representing a fire bag has already been used by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation both during the battles in the Sukhoi Stavka area in the Kherson region, as well as in the "Bakhmut meat grinder", a hand in the creation of which was also applied by General Surovikin. What losses did the APU have in the offensive and what reserves remained? During the 17 days of the offensive, the losses of the AFU amounted to approximately 17-20 battalions killed and wounded, which is equivalent to 16 thousand people or five brigades of 3,500 people each. In total, about 5 brigades out of 9 trained and equipped according to NATO standards were allegedly involved in the APU offensive, which means that more than half of the reserves prepared for the strike have already been destroyed. In fact, the "Surovikin line" is gradually becoming a "second Bakhmut" for the Ukrainian army — more and more troops are needed for combat operations in this area, which, in addition to sending reserves, have to be removed from the front in Limansk, Kupyansk and other directions.
    1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. Примерно 600 лет назад, корабли Португалии отправились на африканский континент и португальцы начали торговать африканскими рабами, при этом активно разграбляя африканские страны. С этих пор началась колонизация Африки. За счёт продажи рабов и использования рабского труда, а также разграбления Африки, началось примитивное накопление капитала, что и стало фундаментом капиталистической экономики. Разграблялась Африка, Индия и территория, которую сейчас мы называем Америкой. Шло время, общество и технологии развивались и таким образом мы пришли к неоколониализму. Зачем держать постоянный военный контингент в колониях, если можно ими управлять посредством "своих людей" на местах, назначенных метрополией? Как видим, со времени начала колонизации ничего не изменилось, а разворовывание колоний только немного изменило форму. Страны-колонизаторы, а это большая часть нынешних стран коллективного Запада, богатели, в то время как население колоний становилось беднее. Чтобы иметь возможность получать практически дармовые ресурсы, колонизаторы всеми способами тормозили развитие колоний. Изменились и способы разграбления. Если раньше у колоний ресурсы попросту отнимали, то теперь начали их обменивать на "огненную воду" и другие товары необходимые населению колоний, но всегда это был неравноценный обмен. Отсюда видно, что для разграбления колоний не так важна была валюта, потому что были другие способы неравноценного обмена. По мере роста благосостояния Запада, разграбление колоний тоже усовершенствовалось и таким образом натуральный обмен и различные методы принуждения, уступили место экономическому влиянию посредством резервных валют: фунту, затем доллару. Посла того, как доллар был отвязан от золотого стандарта, фактически, страны обменивали реальные ресурсы на обычную бумагу. И вновь мы видим, что благосостояние Запада базировалось на разграблении колоний, но только в другой форме-ресурсы за бумагу, причём и здесь основой был неравноценный обмен. Страны Запада сами устанавливали удобные им цены на ресурсы, а поскольку тогда было ресурсное изобилие, добывающие страны были вынуждены продавать ресурсы за навязанные им цены. Для Запада всё складывалось удачно: весь мир добывал для них ресурсы и создавал материальные блага и единственным препятствием к полному мировому господству США и коллективного Запада, был СССР. К концу 80-х годов, мир ощутил недостаток ресурсов, назревал кризис и одновременно с этим были активно предприняты попытки развалить Советский Союз, которые в 91-ом привели к успеху. И Запад зажил богато и счастливо преодолев уже начавшийся кризис, за счёт разграбления республик входивших в СССР и стран Советского блока. Из России Запад буквально высасывал все доступные ресурсы и потому напрямую вмешался в выборы и принял активное участие в переизбрании Ельцина на второй срок. Даже воевать не нужно, ресурсы и богатства нажитые веками, россияне отдавали добровольно, потому что руководил страной "подконтрольный им человек". И здесь мы видим, что Запад вновь решил свои проблемы за счёт грабежа и обмана. Так длилось до тех пор, пока не пришёл к власти Путин, который постепенно начал прекращать разграбление России. Награбленного в результате распада СССР, Западу хватило почти на 20 лет и в 2009 вновь начался кризис. Западу удалось "закамуфлировать"и ослабить влияние кризиса, но не решить саму проблему и кризис продолжается до сих пор, постепенно набирая силу. Чтобы выйти из кризиса, нужно кого-то ограбить, но кого? Россия смогла восстановить свою экономику и военную мощь, Китай тоже стал ведущей экономикой и мировой фабрикой, от товаров которого зависит Запад. Индия тоже стала экономически сильной страной и её не ограбить. На Ближнем Востоке, влияние усилили Россия и Китай и тоже пограбить уже не получается и остаётся Африка, но вот незадача-и здесь на фоне ослабления влияния Запада, усилилось влияние России и Китая. Раньше американцы позволяли своим европейским союзникам грабить, но они должны были обязательно делиться награбленным. Уже 30 лет американский бюджет в дефиците, отсюда и такой огромный долг, но американцы свободно обменивали свои бумажки на европейские товары и товары из других стран, что привело к перенасыщению мировой экономики долларами. Пока мировая экономика развивалась, доллары свободно оседали в валютных резервах стран и накоплениях частных лиц. Таким образом американская инфляция аккумулировалась и хранилась в резервах стран и у обладателей долларовых сбережений, поэтому в самих США она была низкой. Так что же произошло и почему вдруг инфляция в США и странах Запада резко пошла вверх? Ответ прост-некого стало грабить.
    1
  1563. Миру надоело кормить паразита в лице США и подвластным им стран Запада. По инициативе России и Китая начали создаваться альтернативные Западу экономические союзы: БРИКС, ШОС и другие, которые своей целью поставили развитие экономик стран-участниц, с минимальной зависимостью от доллара, до этого тормозившего их развитие. Начался активный переход на взаиморасчёты в нац. валютах и избавление от долларовых активов. Это привело к тому, что инфляция хранившаяся ранее в резервах России, Китая и других стран, начала возвращаться США и Западу. Какой смысл торговать за доллары, если в любой момент американцы могут заморозить долларовые счета-попросту украсть ваши накопления, как это сделали с резервами Венесуэлы, России и других стран? Проще от них избавиться и вернуть тому, кто их печатает и ими расплачивается, а значит вернуть инфляцию тому, кто её создаёт. Также это лишает США и страны Запада возможности диктовать удобные им цены, как на энерго, так и на другие ресурсы и контролировать потоки товаров и ресурсов. Влияние доллара начало снижаться и это привело к тому, что сейчас казначейство США не знает куда пристроить долговые бумаги на 1,4 трлн. долларов, чтобы закрыть дыру в бюджете. Деньги печатать можно в любых количествах, но важно другое: согласятся ли вам что-то продать за эти деньги. За деньги, к которым упало доверие во всём мире. В мире заметен недостаток многих ресурсов и ни одна развитая экономика не способна нормально функционировать без ресурсов Африки, России и Китая. Причём Россия-единственная страна в мире имеющая полное ресурсное обеспечение и способная развиваться даже при полной изоляции от мировой экономики, но изолировать её в принципе невозможно. По мере усиления экономик и военных возможностей России, Индии, Китая, Ирана и других стран и одновременного ослабления военных возможностей США, американцы столкнулись с проблемой, у которой нет идеального решения-как противостоять экономикам этих стран и сохранить гегемонию, имея слабую промышленность и разваливающуюся инфраструктуру. Как видно из короткого и далеко не полного приведённого мною исторического экскурса, американцы не могут сохранить текущий образ жизни без внешних поступлений и решение было принято-Европа. США заметно деградировали в военном отношении, а Европу можно обворовывать без военного вмешательства. Она сама всё нужное отдаст, главное-"свои люди" в руководстве европейских стран. Но полностью разрушать экономики европейских стран американцам невыгодно и нужно вывести капитал и только нужные США производства, а Европу оставить под своим влиянием для сдерживания России. По мере усиливающихся неудач в противостоянии с Россией, американцы, чтобы сохранить лицо и выйти из этого противостояния с минимальными потерями, переключают внимание мирового сообщества на "авторитарный" Китай. Отсюда и шары в небе США и другие обвинения Китая. Не просто так, шар стоимостью 13 долларов, был поражён ракетой стоимостью 400 тыс. долларов. Принцип простой: нам нужно сдерживать Китай, а вы там, в Европе, сдерживайте Россию. Не сможете-ваши проблемы. Но что американцам даст обезжиривание Европы? Ещё 5-8 лет возможность удержать приемлемый уровень жизни в США, а что потом? Только снижение уровня жизни и начинать жить на свои, что отчасти происходит уже сейчас и это только начало.
    1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. When the Maidan happened, I was immediately called: "Professor Sachs, the new Ukrainian Prime Minister would like to see you to discuss the economic crisis because I am quite good at this." I flew to Kyiv and was taken through Maidan, where I was told how the U.S. had paid money to all the people around Maidan. A spontaneous revolution of dignity? Ladies and gentlemen, where does all this media come from? Where do all these organizations come from? Where do all these buses come from? Where do all these summoned people come from? Are you kidding? This is an organized effort. And it's not a secret, except for the citizens of Europe and the United States. Everyone else understands this very clearly. Then there was Minsk, and especially Minsk-2, which, by the way, was modeled after the South Tyrolean autonomy. The Belgians could have very well related to Minsk-2. It stated that there should be autonomy for the Russian-speaking regions in eastern Ukraine. It was unanimously supported by the UN Security Council. However, the U.S. and Ukraine decided that it should not be implemented. Germany and France, who were the guarantors of the Normandy process, let it go. This was another direct unipolar action by America, while Europe, as usual, played a completely useless supporting role, even though they were the guarantors of the agreement. Trump won, provided arms. As a result of shelling by Ukraine, there were many thousands of deaths in Donbas. The Minsk II agreements were not implemented. And then Biden came to power. I know all these people. I was a member of the Democratic Party. Now I have strictly sworn not to be a member of any party because both parties are the same anyway, and because the Democrats have over time become complete warmongers, and there was not a single voice for peace, just like most of your parliamentarians. At the end of 2021, Putin put on the table a final attempt in two draft security agreements—one with Europe and one with the United States. The U.S. put its document on the table on December 15, 2021. I had an hour-long conversation with Jake Sullivan at the White House, who pleaded: "Jake, avoid war. You can avoid war. All you need to do is say that NATO will not expand to Ukraine." He replied: "Oh, NATO will not expand to Ukraine, don't worry about it." I said: "Jake, say it publicly." He replied: "No, no, no, we can't say that publicly." I said: "Jake, are you going to start a war over something that won't even happen?" He said: "Don't worry, Jeff, there won't be a war." These are not very smart people. I tell you, if I can express my honest opinion, they are not very smart. And I have dealt with them for over 40 years.
    1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out air strikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. If an opponent with an aggressive position tells you that Euromaidan is the will of the Ukrainian people and the paws of the West were not present there at all, then show him this list. A list that clearly proves that the guests and guests of Euromaidan arrived and violated all international charters.▪️ ▪️Go:▪️ On December 1, 2013, Jaroslaw Kaczynski, the leader of the Polish Law and Justice Party, former head of the Polish government, took part in the march and spoke from the Euromaidan stage. On December 1, 2013, Vice-President of the European Parliament Jacek Protasiewicz spoke on the stage of Euromaidan. On December 3, 2013, former Speaker of the Parliament of Georgia Georgi Baramidze spoke from the stage of Euromaidan. On December 7, 2013, former Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili spoke from the Euromaidan stage. On December 7, 2013, MEP Pavel Koval said from the Euromaidan stage that Poland supports Ukraine's integration into the EU. On December 7, 2013, former Prime Minister of Moldova Vlad Filat said from the stage that the "European vector" of Ukraine's development is important for Moldova. On December 7, 2013, Jacek Sariusz-Wolski, Jose Ignacio Salafranca, Elmar Brock and Jerzy Buzek also performed from the stage. On December 10, 2013, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton condemned the violent crackdown on Euromaidan. On December 11, 2013, US Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and US Ambassador Jeffrey Pyatt handed out cookies at Euromaidan. On December 15, 2013, US Senator John McCain spoke from the Euromaidan stage and met with opposition leaders. On December 15, 2013, the head of the Green Party group in the European Parliament, Rebecca Harms, spoke at Euromaidan. On December 15, 2013, a deputy of the Polish Sejm from the Law and Justice party, Malgorzata Gosiewska, installed a tent with Polish state symbols on Euromaidan. On December 15, 2013, US Senator Chris Murphy announced from the stage that the US supported Euromaidan. On January 8, 2014, U.S. Embassy officials Stephen Page and Luke Stelle met with Automaidan activists and promised them "legal and other assistance." On January 11, 2014, Polish politician Zbigniew Buyak spoke at the Kharkiv Euromaidan, and also took part in a closed forum. On January 15, 2014, British Ambassador Simon Smith met with Euromaidan activists and supported a "peaceful protest". ▪️These are only guests and guests at Euromaidan. How many other patrons were there who sponsored this farce of the "Hromadsky TV tower".▪️ ⚫The International Fund "Renaissance" – 88 thousand hryvnia. ⚫The US Embassy – 400 thousand hryvnias. ⚫Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands – 793 thousand hryvnias. The "Declaration on the Principles of International Law" (dated October 24, 1970) reads:▪️ "By virtue of the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, enshrined in the UN Charter, all peoples have the right to freely determine their political status and pursue their economic, social and cultural development WITHOUT OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE, and each State is obliged to respect this right in accordance with the provisions of the Charter." ▪️Paragraph 7 of Article 2 of the UN Charter states:▪️ ⚫"Real The Charter in no way gives the United Nations the right to interfere in matters that are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any State."⚫ ▪️Similar principles are enshrined in the documents of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe:▪️ The Helsinki Final Act of 1975. ⚫The final document of the 1986 Vienna Meeting. ⚫Document of the Copenhagen Meeting of the CSCE 1990 Conference on the Human Dimension. ▪️And other international legal acts
    1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815.  @watt9128  тяжелый физический труд. На таких и до 60ти не работали, не ври. Так же и до 65 не будут. Если ты думаешь, что возраст власти повысили только по своей прихоти, то это твой диагноз. И кстати, его повышают не только в России. Внуки… огород… банки на зиму… голова не работает… слыш, у нас демократия не? Никто на работе не держит как при совке. В 91м дали свободу - крутитесь сами, планируйте старость, лет в 40 задумывайтесь на какую должность к 55 перейти чтобы больше не пахать. Получает копейки… наверняка у него была счастливая молодость, которую он оплачивает трудной старостью. Я вот по молодости с книжками сидел и даже женился поздно. Работал, переезжал, зарабатывал повышение. Выбрал профессию «нажимать кнопки», а не работу на заводе. Зато под старость не буду ныть что кто-то мне что-то должен. В этом мире никто никому ничего не должен.
    1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. "How long will the war continue? We have to be honest. In this war, the path to victory will be long and difficult. "2-3 weeks", "until the end of the year", "next spring" – all this is not true. We must set ourselves up for a long struggle. Citizens and the authorities – everyone should tune in to a long and difficult war. And only then will we win." Beautiful words. They were uttered by Ukrainian politician Irina Vereshchuk. What inspires me in this speech is that neither the Ukrainian society nor the Ukrainian government are capable of anything for a long time, if it requires dedication, in principle, and such rhetoric is a reason for an all-encompassing panic in Ukraine. They were fed all the time: soon we will win, soon our tanks will go through Red Square, soon the West will drown us in help and we will live as we have never lived before, soon, soon, soon .... And the population is already twenty million, and the prospects of the EU, and even more so NATO, are not closer, and the Ukrainian elite is already biting their elbows and is still secretly cursing Zelensky. When a Ukrainian man in the street is told that the ass in which he lives and dies out will last indefinitely, it does not mobilize him, it kills him. Especially when the hated Russia continues to build roads in the Donbas during the war (!!!!) and laying aqueducts - it's generally unbearable! How so??? It was we who wanted a bright future and rode for this in pots on the Maidan? Why is it that Russia, under the influence of all sanctions, has not fallen to its knees, but is developing the country by reorienting to the East? Wasn't it to us that the Chinese at the end of the thirteenth century offered multibillion-dollar investments for the construction of the Silk Road, and Russia gave sixteen billion to support the economy? Not for war and the destruction of the country, as the West gives, but for life and prosperity? Sixty percent of Ukraine's exports were Russia!!! And now the Poles do not allow Ukrainian grain.... Well, the svidomo ghouls who are killing our common country - have you started to get it? Whether it will still be.
    1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. Экс разведчик ЦРУ Скотт Риттер: Люди не понимают, сколько вообще мы иракцев поубивали в операции «Буря в пустыне». И я не о мирных жителях, я о солдатах. Начали операцию и в первый же день убили 10 000 человек одним махом. Если они укрывались в траншеях, мы просто заживо зарывали их гусеницами. Мы не тратили время и не уговаривали их сдаться. Не хотят сдаться, втаптывайте их гусеницами. Мы не тратили свое время на переговоры. Не хочешь сдаваться, ну так умри. Мы уничтожали их. И так бы я воевал с украинцами – я бы уничтожал их. В первый день операции я бы уничтожил все их командные центры и их систему снабжения. Уничтожил бы все, что им требуется для жизнеобеспечения. У меня превосходство в огневой мощи. Я бы не валял дурака, отправляя пехоту. Находишь концентрацию сил и стираешь с лица земли. Спрятались в поселке – нет поселка. У нас есть инженерные войска, обученные продвижению в городских кварталах. Харьков? Хотите, чтобы я Харьков взял? Мои инженерные батальоны подходят и срывают с землей кварталы целиком, и движутся дальше. Я пропахиваю коридор через весь город. Все, что движется – погибает. Я продвигаюсь и истребляю все живое. Вот как бы как мы воевали. И так до самой границы.
    1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. 1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041. 1
  2042. 1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. "How long will the war continue? We have to be honest. In this war, the path to victory will be long and difficult. "2-3 weeks", "until the end of the year", "next spring" – all this is not true. We must set ourselves up for a long struggle. Citizens and the authorities – everyone should tune in to a long and difficult war. And only then will we win." Beautiful words. They were uttered by Ukrainian politician Irina Vereshchuk. What inspires me in this speech is that neither the Ukrainian society nor the Ukrainian government are capable of anything for a long time, if it requires dedication, in principle, and such rhetoric is a reason for an all-encompassing panic in Ukraine. They were fed all the time: soon we will win, soon our tanks will go through Red Square, soon the West will drown us in help and we will live as we have never lived before, soon, soon, soon .... And the population is already twenty million, and the prospects of the EU, and even more so NATO, are not closer, and the Ukrainian elite is already biting their elbows and is still secretly cursing Zelensky. When a Ukrainian man in the street is told that the ass in which he lives and dies out will last indefinitely, it does not mobilize him, it kills him. Especially when the hated Russia continues to build roads in the Donbas during the war (!!!!) and laying aqueducts - it's generally unbearable! How so??? It was we who wanted a bright future and rode for this in pots on the Maidan? Why is it that Russia, under the influence of all sanctions, has not fallen to its knees, but is developing the country by reorienting to the East? Wasn't it to us that the Chinese at the end of the thirteenth century offered multibillion-dollar investments for the construction of the Silk Road, and Russia gave sixteen billion to support the economy? Not for war and the destruction of the country, as the West gives, but for life and prosperity? Sixty percent of Ukraine's exports were Russia!!! And now the Poles do not allow Ukrainian grain.... Well, the svidomo ghouls who are killing our common country - have you started to get it? Whether it will still be.
    1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. 1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. 1
  2106. 1
  2107. 1
  2108. 1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. 1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. 1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122. 1
  2123. 1
  2124. 1
  2125. 1
  2126. 1
  2127. 1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137. 1
  2138. 1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we keep our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out airstrikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…🎉
    1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. 1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. 1
  2181. 1
  2182. 1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203.  @YuureiInu  as per “it was choice of Ukrainian people: On December 2013, Jaroslaw Kaczynski, the leader of the Polish Law and Justice Party, former head of the Polish government, took part in the march and spoke from the Euromaidan stage. On December 1, 2013, Vice-President of the European Parliament Jacek Protasiewicz spoke on the stage of Euromaidan. On December 3, 2013, former Speaker of the Parliament of Georgia Georgi Baramidze spoke from the stage of Euromaidan. On December 7, 2013, former Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili spoke from the Euromaidan stage. On December 7, 2013, MEP Pavlo Koval said from the Euromaidan stage that Poland supports Ukraine's integration into the EU. On December 7, 2013, former Prime Minister of Moldova Vlad Filat said from the stage that the "European vector" of Ukraine's development is important for Moldova. On December 7, 2013, Jacek Sariusz-Wolski, Jose Ignacio Salafranca, Elmar Brock and Jerzy Buzek also performed from the stage. On December 10, 2013, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton condemned the violent crackdown on Euromaidan. On December 11, 2013, US Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and US Ambassador Jeffrey Pyatt handed out cookies at Euromaidan. On December 15, 2013, US Senator John McCain spoke from the Euromaidan stage and met with opposition leaders. On December 15, 2013, the head of the Green Party group in the European Parliament, Rebecca Harms, spoke at Euromaidan. On December 15, 2013, a deputy of the Polish Sejm from the Law and Justice party, Malgorzata Gosiewska, installed a tent with Polish state symbols on Euromaidan. On December 15, 2013, US Senator Chris Murphy announced from the stage that the US supported Euromaidan. On January 8, 2014, U.S. Embassy officials Stephen Page and Luke Stelle met with Automaidan activists and promised them "legal and other assistance." On January 11, 2014, Polish politician Zbigniew Buyak spoke at the Kharkiv Euromaidan, and also took part in a closed forum. On January 15, 2014, British Ambassador Simon Smith met with Euromaidan activists and supported a "peaceful protest". ▪️These are only guests and guests at Euromaidan. How many other patrons were there who sponsored this farce of the "Hromadsky TV tower".▪️ ⚫The International Fund "Renaissance" – 88 thousand hryvnia. ⚫The US Embassy – 400 thousand hryvnias. ⚫Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands – 793 thousand hryvnias. The "Declaration on the Principles of International Law" (dated October 24, 1970) reads:▪️ "By virtue of the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples enshrined in the UN Charter, all peoples have the right to freely determine their political status and pursue their economic, social and cultural development WITHOUT OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE, and each State is obliged to respect this right in accordance with the provisions of the Charter." ▪️Paragraph 7 of Article 2 of the UN Charter states:▪️ ⚫"Real The Charter in no way gives the United Nations the right to interfere in matters that are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any State."⚫ ▪️Similar principles are enshrined in the documents of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe:▪️ The Helsinki Final Act of 1975. ⚫The final document of the 1986 Vienna Meeting. ⚫Document of the Copenhagen Meeting of the CSCE 1990 Conference on the Human Dimension.
    1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. 1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. 1
  2244. 1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. 1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. 1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285.  @o.O-still-O.O-confused-O.o  Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out air strikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. 1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. 1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. 1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. 1
  2330. 1
  2331. 1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. When the Maidan happened, I was immediately called: "Professor Sachs, the new Ukrainian Prime Minister would like to see you to discuss the economic crisis because I am quite good at this." I flew to Kyiv and was taken through Maidan, where I was told how the U.S. had paid money to all the people around Maidan. A spontaneous revolution of dignity? Ladies and gentlemen, where does all this media come from? Where do all these organizations come from? Where do all these buses come from? Where do all these summoned people come from? Are you kidding? This is an organized effort. And it's not a secret, except for the citizens of Europe and the United States. Everyone else understands this very clearly. Then there was Minsk, and especially Minsk-2, which, by the way, was modeled after the South Tyrolean autonomy. The Belgians could have very well related to Minsk-2. It stated that there should be autonomy for the Russian-speaking regions in eastern Ukraine. It was unanimously supported by the UN Security Council. However, the U.S. and Ukraine decided that it should not be implemented. Germany and France, who were the guarantors of the Normandy process, let it go. This was another direct unipolar action by America, while Europe, as usual, played a completely useless supporting role, even though they were the guarantors of the agreement. Trump won, provided arms. As a result of shelling by Ukraine, there were many thousands of deaths in Donbas. The Minsk II agreements were not implemented. And then Biden came to power. I know all these people. I was a member of the Democratic Party. Now I have strictly sworn not to be a member of any party because both parties are the same anyway, and because the Democrats have over time become complete warmongers, and there was not a single voice for peace, just like most of your parliamentarians. At the end of 2021, Putin put on the table a final attempt in two draft security agreements—one with Europe and one with the United States. The U.S. put its document on the table on December 15, 2021. I had an hour-long conversation with Jake Sullivan at the White House, who pleaded: "Jake, avoid war. You can avoid war. All you need to do is say that NATO will not expand to Ukraine." He replied: "Oh, NATO will not expand to Ukraine, don't worry about it." I said: "Jake, say it publicly." He replied: "No, no, no, we can't say that publicly." I said: "Jake, are you going to start a war over something that won't even happen?" He said: "Don't worry, Jeff, there won't be a war." These are not very smart people. I tell you, if I can express my honest opinion, they are not very smart. And I have dealt with them for over 40 years.
    1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. 1
  2353. 1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. 1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. 1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. 1
  2376. 1
  2377. 1
  2378. 1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388. 1
  2389. 1
  2390. 1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393. 1
  2394. 1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399. 1
  2400. 1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. 1
  2406. 1
  2407. 1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. 1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414. 1
  2415. 1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. 1
  2421. 1
  2422. 1
  2423. 1
  2424. 1
  2425. 1
  2426. 1
  2427. 1
  2428. 1
  2429. 1
  2430. 1
  2431. 1
  2432. 1
  2433. 1
  2434. 1
  2435. 1
  2436. 1
  2437. 1
  2438. 1
  2439. 1
  2440. 1
  2441. 1
  2442. 1
  2443. 1
  2444. 1
  2445. 1
  2446. 1
  2447. 1
  2448. 1
  2449. 1
  2450. 1
  2451. 1
  2452. 1
  2453. 1
  2454. 1
  2455. 1
  2456. 1
  2457. 1
  2458. 1
  2459. 1
  2460. 1
  2461. 1
  2462. 1
  2463. 1
  2464. 1
  2465. 1
  2466. 1
  2467. 1
  2468. 1
  2469. 1
  2470. 1
  2471. 1
  2472. 1
  2473. 1
  2474. 1
  2475. 1
  2476. 1
  2477. 1
  2478. 1
  2479. 1
  2480. 1
  2481. 1
  2482. 1
  2483. 1
  2484. 1
  2485. 1
  2486. 1
  2487. 1
  2488. 1
  2489. 1
  2490. 1
  2491. 1
  2492. ▪️Если оппонент с агрессивной позицией говорит вам о том, что Евромайдан - это воля украинского народа и лапы Запада там не присутствовали вообще, то покажите ему этот список. Список, который чётко доказывает, что гости и гостьи Евромайдана - прибыли и нарушили все международные уставы.▪️ ▪️Поехали:▪️ ⚫1 декабря 2013 года принял участие в шествии и выступил со сцены Евромайдана лидер польской партии "Закон и справедливость", бывший глава польского правительства Ярослав Качинский. ⚫1 декабря 2013 года на сцене Евромайдана выступал вице-президент Европарламента Яцек Протасевич. ⚫3 декабря 2013 года экс-спикер парламента Грузии Георги Барамидзе выступил со сцены Евромайдана. ⚫7 декабря 2013 года бывший президент Грузии Михаил Саакашвили выступил со сцены Евромайдана. ⚫7 декабря 2013 года депутат Европарламента Павел Коваль заявил со сцены Евромайдана, что Польша поддерживает интеграцию Украины в ЕС. ⚫7 декабря 2013 года экс-премьер-министр Молдовы Влад Филат со сцены заявил, что для Молдовы важен именно "европейский вектор" развития Украины. ⚫7 декабря 2013 года со сцены также выступили Яцек Сариуш-Вольский, Хосе Игнасио Салафранка, Элмар Брок и Ежи Бузек. ⚫10 декабря 2013 года Верховный представитель ЕС по иностранным делам и политике безопасности Кэтрин Эштон осудила силовой разгон Евромайдана. ⚫11 декабря 2013 года заместитель Госсекретаря США Виктория Нуланд и посол США Джеффри Пайетт раздавали на евромайдане печеньки. ⚫15 декабря 2013 года сенатор США Джон МакКейн выступил со сцены Евромайдана и встретился с лидерами оппозиции. ⚫15 декабря 2013 года руководитель группы "Партии зелёных" в Европарламенте Ребекка Хармс выступила на Евромайдане. ⚫15 декабря 2013 года депутат польского Сейма от партии "Право и справедливость" Малгожата Госиевская установила на Евромайдане палатку с польской государственной символикой. ⚫15 декабря 2013 года сенатор США Крис Мерфи заявил со сцены о поддержке Евромайдана со стороны США. ⚫8 января 2014 года сотрудники посольства США Стивен Пейдж и Люк Штелле встретились с активистами Автомайдана и пообещали им "юридическую и другую помощь". ⚫11 января 2014 года польский политик Збигнев Буяк выступал на харьковском Евромайдане, а также принимал участие в закрытом форуме. ⚫15 января 2014 года посол Великобритании Саймон Смитт встречался с активистами Евромайдана и поддержал "мирный протест". ▪️Это только гости и гостьи на Евромайдане. Сколько было еще меценатов, кто спонсировал этот балаган "Громадського телебачення".▪️ ⚫Международный Фонд "Возрождение" – 88 тысяч гривен. ⚫Посольство США – 400 тысяч гривен. ⚫Посольство Королевства Нидерландов – 793 тысячи гривен. ▪️В "Декларации о принципах международного права" (от 24 октября 1970 года) значится:▪️ ⚫"В силу принципа равноправия и самоопределения народов, закреплённого в Уставе ООН, все народы имеют право свободно определять БЕЗ ВМЕШАТЕЛЬСТВА ИЗВНЕ свой политический статус и осуществлять свое экономическое, социальное и культурное развитие, и каждое государство обязано уважать это право в соответствии с положениями Устава".⚫ ▪️Пункт 7 статьи 2 Устава ООН гласит:▪️ ⚫"Настоящий Устав ни в коей мере не дает Организации Объединенных Наций права на вмешательство в дела, по существу входящие во внутреннюю компетенцию любого государства".⚫ ▪️Аналогичные принципы закреплены в документах Совещания по безопасности и сотрудничеству в Европе:▪️ ⚫Хельсинкском Заключительном акте 1975 года. ⚫Итоговом документе Венской встречи 1986 года. ⚫Документе Копенгагенского совещания Конференции по человеческому измерению СБСЕ 1990 года. ▪️И других международно-правовых актах
    1
  2493. 1
  2494. 1
  2495. 1
  2496. 1
  2497. 1
  2498. 1
  2499. 1
  2500. 1
  2501. 1
  2502. 1
  2503. 1
  2504. 1
  2505. 1
  2506. 1
  2507. 1
  2508. 1
  2509. 1
  2510. 1
  2511. 1
  2512. 1
  2513. 1
  2514. 1
  2515. 1
  2516. 1
  2517. 1
  2518. 1
  2519. 1
  2520. 1
  2521. 1
  2522. 1
  2523. 1
  2524. 1
  2525. 1
  2526. 1
  2527. 1
  2528. 1
  2529. 1
  2530. 1
  2531. 1
  2532. 1
  2533. 1
  2534. 1
  2535. 1
  2536. 1
  2537. 1
  2538. 1
  2539. 1
  2540. 1
  2541. 1
  2542. 1
  2543. 1
  2544. 1
  2545. 1
  2546. 1
  2547. 1
  2548. 1
  2549. 1
  2550. 1
  2551. 1
  2552. 1
  2553. 1
  2554. 1
  2555. 1
  2556. 1
  2557. 1
  2558. 1
  2559. 1
  2560. 1
  2561. 1
  2562. 1
  2563. 1
  2564. 1
  2565. 1
  2566. 1
  2567. 1
  2568. 1
  2569. 1
  2570. 1
  2571. 1
  2572. 1
  2573. 1
  2574. 1
  2575. 1
  2576. 1
  2577. 1
  2578. 1
  2579. 1
  2580. 1
  2581. 1
  2582.  @youtube_and_Igor_Valerievich  сложно уловить этот поток разума… но кажется в общем понял. Мой ответ таков: чем ныть онлайн и ждать чего-то от государства (которое и так дает немало), лучше работать над собой, учиться, переезжать, работать, снова учиться. Причем смолоду. И в итоге получишь любимую и хорошо оплачиваемую работу. Давно уже надо было поменять менталитет, уже более 30 лет государство за тобой не бегает давая и заставляя работать. Даже против твоей воли. В 91м тебе дали свободу, сейчас по сравнению с 90ми тебе дали еще и условия (безопасность на улицах, отсутствие эконом потрясений) - включи голову и вперед! Даже если работа будет за границей - это не будет зазорно, главное - Родину не хаять. Ну а государственные вопросы оставь государству: про будет с врачами и т д. Ищущие, да обретут. Изобретают… тебе просто лень почитать про наши изобретения. И опять же: позаботься о себе лично, а остальное оставь государству. Еще и потому, что ты гораздо хуже чем власти проинформирован о том, что на самом деле в стране делается.
    1
  2583. 1
  2584. 1
  2585. 1
  2586. 1
  2587. 1
  2588. 1
  2589. 1
  2590. 1
  2591. 1
  2592. 1
  2593. 1
  2594. 1
  2595. 1
  2596. 1
  2597. 1
  2598. 1
  2599. 1
  2600. 1
  2601. 1
  2602. 1
  2603. 1
  2604. 1
  2605. 1
  2606. 1
  2607. 1
  2608. 1
  2609. 1
  2610. 1
  2611. 1
  2612. Лицемерие Запада 2.0 “То, что 70% территории страны осталось без электричества показывает, что мы держим палец на выключателе. Мы можем включать и выключать электричество там, где это нам нужно и там, где мы этого хотим”. Как думаете, чьи это слова? Одного из российских военкоров? Экспертов ток-шоу? Или может Дмитрия Медведева? Нет, друзья. Это слова официального представителя НАТО Джейми Шеа. Вот только сказаны были они не сейчас, а в 1999 году во время бомбардировок Югославии. В 1999 году НАТО при поддержке "мирового сообщества" наносило авиаудары по электростанциям в Сербии, что привело к блэкауту в целой стране на несколько недель. Об этом с гордостью сообщали западные медиа, в том числе CNN и Washington post. Они смаковали название каждой электростанции, выведенной из строя и гордо рапортовали о применении новейшего типа боеприпасов – графитовых бомб. Теперь же Запад требует от России прекратить удары по объектам энергетической инфраструктуры Украины. Только вот чем наши удары отличаются от натовских? Мы не уничтожаем сами электростанции, вырабатывающие энергию. Мы не превращаем в пепелище целые города. Напомню, что ковровые бомбардировки и ракетные удары по Сербии длились 78 дней. Погибло более 3000 мирных жителей, десятки тысяч получили ранения. Ответственность за данные действия несут 19 стран НАТО, участвовавших в этом военном преступлении. Мы же применяем высокоточные ракеты, и выбираем в качестве целей распределительные узлы электросети. Лицемерие Запада не имеет границ…
    1
  2613. 1
  2614. 1
  2615. 1
  2616. 1
  2617. 1
  2618. 1
  2619. 1
  2620. 1
  2621. 1
  2622. 1
  2623. 1
  2624. 1
  2625. 1
  2626. 1
  2627. 1
  2628. 1
  2629. 1
  2630. 1
  2631. 1
  2632. 1
  2633. 1
  2634. 1
  2635. 1
  2636. 1
  2637. 1
  2638. 1
  2639. 1
  2640. 1
  2641. 1
  2642. 1
  2643. 1
  2644. 1
  2645. 1
  2646. 1
  2647. 1
  2648. 1
  2649. 1
  2650. 1
  2651. 1
  2652. 1
  2653. 1
  2654. 1
  2655. 1
  2656. 1
  2657. 1
  2658. 1
  2659. 1
  2660. 1
  2661. 1
  2662. 1
  2663. 1
  2664. 1
  2665. 1
  2666. 1
  2667. 1
  2668. 1
  2669. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we keep our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out airstrikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  2670. 1
  2671. 1
  2672. 1
  2673. 1
  2674. 1
  2675. 1
  2676. 1
  2677. 1
  2678. 1
  2679. 1
  2680. 1
  2681. 1
  2682. 1
  2683. 1
  2684. 1
  2685. 1
  2686. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out air strikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  2687. 1
  2688. 1
  2689. 1
  2690. 1
  2691. 1
  2692. 1
  2693. 1
  2694. 1
  2695. 1
  2696. 1
  2697. 1
  2698. 1
  2699. 1
  2700. 1
  2701. 1
  2702. 1
  2703. 1
  2704. 1
  2705. 1
  2706. 1
  2707. 1
  2708. 1
  2709. 1
  2710. 1
  2711. 1
  2712. 1
  2713. 1
  2714. 1
  2715. 1
  2716. 1
  2717. 1
  2718. 1
  2719. 1
  2720. 1
  2721. 1
  2722. 1
  2723. 1
  2724. 1
  2725. 1
  2726. 1
  2727. 1
  2728. 1
  2729. 1
  2730. 1
  2731. 1
  2732. 1
  2733. 1
  2734. 1
  2735. 1
  2736. 1
  2737. 1
  2738. 1
  2739. 1
  2740. 1
  2741. 1
  2742. 1
  2743. 1
  2744. 1
  2745. The German press writes: The Russians are fighting better... than expected "The Russians are fighting better than expected. The attacks since Thursday have not yet led to the liberation of any cities or even villages," writes Bild, describing the events on the southern front. You read these reports of the German press today about the unexpected resilience of the Russian army, and you remember that 80 years ago, already other Germans, in the same way, at first with surprise, and then with horror, wrote... the same: "October 1, 1942. Our assault battalion reached the Volga. More precisely, the Volga is still 500 meters away. Tomorrow we will be on the other side and the war is over." "October 3. Very strong fire resistance, we cannot overcome these 500 meters. We are standing on the border of some grain elevator." "October 6th. Damn elevator. It is impossible to approach him. Our losses exceeded 30%." "October 10th. Where do these Russians come from? The elevator is no longer there, but every time we approach it, there is a fire coming from under the ground." "October 15th. Hooray, we have overcome the elevator. There are 100 people left from our battalion." And a little lower: "It turned out that the elevator was defended by 18 Russians, we found 18 corpses." Comment: I would advise modern Germans (and not only them) to read the memoirs of their own soldiers, officers and generals of that war, who ended their "victorious" campaign in Russia by capitulating in Berlin. As we can see, history repeats itself here too,
    1
  2746. 1
  2747. 1
  2748. 1
  2749. 1
  2750. 1
  2751. 1
  2752. 1
  2753. 1
  2754. 1
  2755. 1
  2756. 1
  2757. 1
  2758. 1
  2759. 1
  2760. 1
  2761. 1
  2762. 1
  2763. 1
  2764. 1
  2765. 1
  2766. 1
  2767. 1
  2768. 1
  2769. 1
  2770. 1
  2771. 1
  2772. 1
  2773. 1
  2774. 1
  2775. 1
  2776. 1
  2777. 1
  2778. 1
  2779. 1
  2780. 1
  2781. 1
  2782. 1
  2783. 1
  2784. 1
  2785. 1
  2786. 1
  2787. 1
  2788. 1
  2789. 1
  2790. 1
  2791. 1
  2792. 1
  2793. 1
  2794. 1
  2795. 1
  2796. 1
  2797. 1
  2798. 1
  2799. 1
  2800. 1
  2801. 1
  2802. 1
  2803. 1
  2804. 1
  2805. 1
  2806. 1
  2807. 1
  2808. 1
  2809. 1
  2810. 1
  2811. 1
  2812. 1
  2813. 1
  2814. 1
  2815. 1
  2816. 1
  2817. 1
  2818. 1
  2819. 1
  2820. 1
  2821. 1
  2822. 1
  2823. 1
  2824. 1
  2825. 1
  2826. 1
  2827. 1
  2828. 1
  2829. 1
  2830. 1
  2831. 1
  2832. 1
  2833. 1
  2834. 1
  2835. 1
  2836. 1
  2837. 1
  2838. 1
  2839. 1
  2840. 1
  2841. 1
  2842. 1
  2843. 1
  2844. 1
  2845. 1
  2846. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out air strikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  2847. 1
  2848. 1
  2849. 1
  2850. 1
  2851. 1
  2852. 1
  2853. 1
  2854. 1
  2855. 1
  2856. 1
  2857. 1
  2858. 1
  2859. 1
  2860. 1
  2861. 1
  2862. 1
  2863. 1
  2864. 1
  2865. 1
  2866. 1
  2867. 1
  2868. 1
  2869. Statement by the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy J.Borrell's reference to the comparison of the policy of the United States and its allies towards Moscow with the actions of A. Hitler, given by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Sergey Lavrov during a press conference on January 18, sounds hypocritical, especially against the background of racist statements by the head of EU diplomacy, who divided the world into a "blooming garden", in which "a billion EU and US citizens live", and the "jungle" advancing on it, as well as the open support of the Kiev neo-Nazi regime by the European Union. Since 2014, the armed forces of Ukraine and nationalist battalions have been shelling peaceful cities of Donbass, Kherson and Zaporizhia regions of Russia with impunity, killing civilians, including children. At the same time, the EU is training the AFU fighters, preparing to supply even more weapons and military equipment that will continue to be used to destroy civilians. The EU members claim that there are no parallels, but they themselves turn a blind eye to swastikas on the chevrons of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Nazi flags and the very symbols with which the Europeans barbarously invaded our lands more than 80 years ago. <...> Once again, we see how individual organizations are trying to push different nations and peoples together. I have to remind you that it was our people who stood up more than 80 years ago to protect humanity from the plague of fascism, misanthropy, Nazism and aggressive imperialist militarism, without dividing it into nationalities. While the Nazis were poisoning Slavs, Jews, Gypsies and other nations in one gas chamber, our fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers fought with the Wehrmacht and freed prisoners of concentration camps. It is their memory that we sacredly honor and will honor for centuries. We must not forget that January 27 is celebrated annually in the world as the International Holocaust Remembrance Day precisely as a sign of gratitude to the soldiers of the Red Army who liberated prisoners of the Nazi concentration camp "Auschwitz" (Auschwitz-Birkenau) on this day in 1944. At the end of the XX – beginning of the XXI century, we faced the desire to discredit the role of our country in the fight against Nazism and neo-Nazism, with outright Russophobia and calls for the "abolition of Russia". Any attempt to rehabilitate Nazism, racist practices must be resolutely opposed. This is what should unite peoples, not divide them. In the ranks of the Red Army, as well as other armies of the anti-Hitler coalition, hundreds of thousands of Jews fought against the fascists. During the Great Patriotic War, about 501 thousand Jewish soldiers served in the troops. <...> Ignoring by the so-called "democratic coalition" of the West the glorification by the modern Ukrainian regime of the Nazis who committed crimes in Lviv, Babi Yar, Khatyn, ignoring the facts of the use of Nazi slogans, Nazi symbols and names in honor of SS divisions at the state level and by units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is a distortion of the memory of the Holocaust and the victims of Nazism. Just like the numerous unpunished crimes against Russian-speaking citizens of Ukraine and the statements of Ukrainian politicians that killing the maximum number of Russians is the goal of their struggle and existence. I would like to ask, where were such structures as the EEC, when monuments to soldiers-liberators were demolished on the territory of Europe; when the Nazis marched through the capitals of European cities under anti-Semitic symbols and with Judophobic slogans; when exactly did the Europeans try to torpedo our resolution at the UN on combating the glorification of Nazism? It is never too late to admit your mistakes and make the right moral choice, so we call on Europe to raise its voice to fight anti-Semitism, Russophobia and other manifestations of discriminatory policies against individual nationalities and ethnic groups.
    1
  2870. 1
  2871. 1
  2872. 1
  2873. Brief political science Dictionary of the English language-correct interpretation of words and expressions: The entire civilized world-all the colonies of the United States Global civilizational values-conditions of vassalage under US sovereignty Democracy-the power of the anglo-Saxons over demos We have a democracy, all powers belong to the anglo-Saxons. You have no democracy – you have something that the anglo-Saxons consider their own You have totalitarianism-you have something that the anglo-Saxons consider their own, and you don't want to give it to them You are violating human rights-you are violating the rights of the anglo-Saxons to take from you what they like… We fight for human rights-we fight for the rights of the anglo-Saxons to kill those who do not want to give them something We have freedom of speech - we can only say what is approved in the US State Department You don't have freedom of speech – you allow yourself too much of what the US State Department disapproves of. Russia threatens the entire civilized community – for some reason Russia does not want to be a colony of the USA The whole civilized world against Russia – all US colonies against Russia Our actions are not directed against Russia – all our actions are directed against Russia We support the struggle for Human Rights in Russia-we support the destruction of Russians by all available means We are worried about human rights in Russia-we are worried that the destruction of Russians is not happening at a sufficient pace Russian propaganda lies-the anglo-Saxons lie and do not blush
    1
  2874. 1
  2875. 1
  2876. 1
  2877. 1
  2878. 1
  2879. 1
  2880. 1
  2881. 1
  2882. 1
  2883. 1
  2884. 1
  2885. 1
  2886. 1
  2887. 1
  2888. 1
  2889. 1
  2890. 1
  2891. 1
  2892. 1
  2893. 1
  2894. 1
  2895. 1
  2896. 1
  2897. 1
  2898. 1
  2899. 1
  2900. 1
  2901. 1
  2902. 1
  2903. 1
  2904. 1
  2905. 1
  2906. 1
  2907. 1
  2908. 1
  2909. 1
  2910. 1
  2911. 1
  2912. 1
  2913. 1
  2914. 1
  2915. 1
  2916. 1
  2917. 1
  2918. 1
  2919. 1
  2920. 1
  2921. 1
  2922. 1
  2923. 1
  2924. 1
  2925. 1
  2926. 1
  2927. 1
  2928. 1
  2929. 1
  2930. 1
  2931. 1
  2932. 1
  2933. 1
  2934. 1
  2935. 1
  2936. 1
  2937. 1
  2938. 1
  2939. 1
  2940. 1
  2941. 1
  2942. 1
  2943. 1
  2944. 1
  2945. 1
  2946. 1
  2947. 1
  2948. 1
  2949. 1
  2950. 1
  2951. 1
  2952. 1
  2953. 1
  2954. 1
  2955. 1
  2956. 1
  2957. 1
  2958. 1
  2959. 1
  2960. 1
  2961. 1
  2962. 1
  2963. 1
  2964. 1
  2965. 1
  2966. 1
  2967. 1
  2968. 1
  2969. 1
  2970. 1
  2971. 1
  2972. 1
  2973. 1
  2974. 1
  2975. Экс разведчик ЦРУ Скотт Риттер: Люди не понимают, сколько вообще мы иракцев поубивали в операции «Буря в пустыне». И я не о мирных жителях, я о солдатах. Начали операцию и в первый же день убили 10 000 человек одним махом. Если они укрывались в траншеях, мы просто заживо зарывали их гусеницами. Мы не тратили время и не уговаривали их сдаться. Не хотят сдаться, втаптывайте их гусеницами. Мы не тратили свое время на переговоры. Не хочешь сдаваться, ну так умри. Мы уничтожали их. И так бы я воевал с украинцами – я бы уничтожал их. В первый день операции я бы уничтожил все их командные центры и их систему снабжения. Уничтожил бы все, что им требуется для жизнеобеспечения. У меня превосходство в огневой мощи. Я бы не валял дурака, отправляя пехоту. Находишь концентрацию сил и стираешь с лица земли. Спрятались в поселке – нет поселка. У нас есть инженерные войска, обученные продвижению в городских кварталах. Харьков? Хотите, чтобы я Харьков взял? Мои инженерные батальоны подходят и срывают с землей кварталы целиком, и движутся дальше. Я пропахиваю коридор через весь город. Все, что движется – погибает. Я продвигаюсь и истребляю все живое. Вот как бы как мы воевали. И так до самой границы….
    1
  2976. 1
  2977. 1
  2978. 1
  2979. 1
  2980. 1
  2981. 1
  2982. 1
  2983. 1
  2984. 1
  2985. 1
  2986. 1
  2987. 1
  2988. 1
  2989. 1
  2990. 1
  2991. 1
  2992. 1
  2993. 1
  2994. 1
  2995. 1
  2996. 1
  2997. 1
  2998. 1
  2999. 1
  3000. 1
  3001. 1
  3002. 1
  3003. 1
  3004. 1
  3005. 1
  3006. 1
  3007. 1
  3008. 1
  3009. 1
  3010. 1
  3011. 1
  3012. 1
  3013. 1
  3014. 1
  3015. 1
  3016. 1
  3017. 1
  3018. 1
  3019. 1
  3020. 1
  3021. 1
  3022. 1
  3023. 1
  3024. 1
  3025. 1
  3026. 1
  3027. 1
  3028. 1
  3029. 1
  3030. 1
  3031. 1
  3032. 1
  3033. 1
  3034. 1
  3035. 1
  3036. 1
  3037. 1
  3038. 1
  3039. 1
  3040. 1
  3041. 1
  3042. 1
  3043. 1
  3044. 1
  3045. 1
  3046. 1
  3047. 1
  3048. 1
  3049. 1
  3050. 1
  3051. 1
  3052. 1
  3053. 1
  3054. 1
  3055. 1
  3056. 1
  3057. 1
  3058. 1
  3059. 1
  3060. 1
  3061. 1
  3062. 1
  3063. 1
  3064. 1
  3065. 1
  3066. 1
  3067. 1
  3068. 1
  3069. 1
  3070. 1
  3071. 1
  3072. 1
  3073. 1
  3074. 1
  3075. 1
  3076. 1
  3077. 1
  3078. 1
  3079. 1
  3080. 1
  3081. 1
  3082. 1
  3083. 1
  3084. 1
  3085. 1
  3086. 1
  3087. 1
  3088. 1
  3089. 1
  3090. 1
  3091. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out air strikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  3092. 1
  3093. 1
  3094. 1
  3095. 1
  3096. 1
  3097. 1
  3098. 1
  3099. 1
  3100. 1
  3101. 1
  3102. 1
  3103. 1
  3104. 1
  3105. 1
  3106. 1
  3107. 1
  3108. 1
  3109. 1
  3110. 1
  3111. 1
  3112. 1
  3113. 1
  3114. 1
  3115. 1
  3116. 1
  3117. 1
  3118. 1
  3119. 1
  3120. 1
  3121. 1
  3122. 1
  3123. 1
  3124. 1
  3125. 1
  3126. 1
  3127. 1
  3128. 1
  3129. 1
  3130. 1
  3131. 1
  3132. 1
  3133. 1
  3134. 1
  3135. 1
  3136. 1
  3137. 1
  3138. 1
  3139. 1
  3140. 1
  3141. 1
  3142. 1
  3143. 1
  3144. 1
  3145. 1
  3146. 1
  3147. 1
  3148. 1
  3149. 1
  3150. 1
  3151. 1
  3152. 1
  3153. 1
  3154. 1
  3155. 1
  3156. 1
  3157. 1
  3158. 1
  3159. 1
  3160. 1
  3161. 1
  3162. 1
  3163. 1
  3164. 1
  3165. 1
  3166. 1
  3167. 1
  3168. 1
  3169. 1
  3170. 1
  3171. 1
  3172. 1
  3173. 1
  3174. 1
  3175. 1
  3176. 1
  3177. 1
  3178. 1
  3179. 1
  3180. 1
  3181. 1
  3182. 1
  3183. 1
  3184. 1
  3185. 1
  3186. 1
  3187. 1
  3188. 1
  3189. 1
  3190. 1
  3191. 1
  3192. 1
  3193. 1
  3194. 1
  3195. 1
  3196. 1
  3197. 1
  3198. 1
  3199. 1
  3200. 1
  3201. 1
  3202. 1
  3203. 1
  3204. 1
  3205. 1
  3206. 1
  3207. 1
  3208. 1
  3209. Chronicle of strikes on the military infrastructure of Odessa over the past two days — the record for the number of strategic objects hit since the beginning of its After the completion of the grain deal and a number of Ukrainian terrorist attacks, the Russian army launched powerful retaliatory strikes, representing the largest attack against the military infrastructure and logistics hubs of Odessa since the beginning of the SVO. Strategically, this attack is very important and caused great damage to the combat capability of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, because the port of Odessa is the main hub of the entire transport system of Ukraine, which can also be used to deliver "Western aid". Now the Russian army has freedom of maneuver, and the AFU may have significant problems with the delivery of "Western aid" and the money that went for grain and with which the Kiev regime could pay for numerous loans. In two days, rocket attacks were carried out at the Odessa, Ilyichevsk and Mykolaiv seaports, the bridge across the Dniester in the Lighthouses was damaged, which creates great logistical problems for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. In addition, explosions were also reported in Zatoka — although it is still unknown what was hit there. Several large warehouses of fuel and lubricants and BC, military units were hit, which creates a shortage of fuel for the enemy. In addition, multiple arrivals outside the city were recorded, as a result of which the second line of air defense was damaged and a strike was struck at the Odessa plant, where surface drones were manufactured.
    1
  3210. 1
  3211. 1
  3212. 1
  3213. 1
  3214. 1
  3215. 1
  3216. 1
  3217. 1
  3218. 1
  3219. 1
  3220. 1
  3221. 1
  3222. 1
  3223. 1
  3224. 1
  3225. 1
  3226. 1
  3227. 1
  3228. 1
  3229. 1
  3230. 1
  3231. 1
  3232. 1
  3233. 1
  3234. 1
  3235. 1
  3236. 1
  3237. 1
  3238. 1
  3239. 1
  3240. 1
  3241. 1
  3242. 1
  3243. 1
  3244. 1
  3245. 1
  3246. 1
  3247. 1
  3248. 1
  3249. 1
  3250. 1
  3251. 1
  3252. 1
  3253. 1
  3254. 1
  3255. 1
  3256. 1
  3257. 1
  3258. 1
  3259. 1
  3260. 1
  3261. 1
  3262. 1
  3263. 1
  3264. 1
  3265. 1
  3266. 1
  3267. 1
  3268. 1
  3269. 1
  3270. 1
  3271. 1
  3272. 1
  3273. 1
  3274. 1
  3275. 1
  3276. 1
  3277. 1
  3278. 1
  3279. 1
  3280. 1
  3281. 1
  3282. 1
  3283. 1
  3284. 1
  3285. 1
  3286. 1
  3287. 1
  3288. 1
  3289. 1
  3290. 1
  3291. 1
  3292. 1
  3293. 1
  3294. 1
  3295. 1
  3296. 1
  3297. 1
  3298. 1
  3299. 1
  3300. 1
  3301. 1
  3302. 1
  3303. 1
  3304. 1
  3305. 1
  3306. 1
  3307. 1
  3308. 1
  3309. 1
  3310. 1
  3311. 1
  3312. 1
  3313. 1
  3314. 1
  3315. 1
  3316. 1
  3317. 1
  3318. 1
  3319. 1
  3320. 1
  3321. 1
  3322. 1
  3323. 1
  3324. 1
  3325. 1
  3326. 1
  3327. 1
  3328. 1
  3329. 1
  3330. 1
  3331. 1
  3332. 1
  3333. 1
  3334. 1
  3335. 1
  3336. 1
  3337. 1
  3338. 1
  3339. 1
  3340. 1
  3341. 1
  3342. 1
  3343. 1
  3344. 1
  3345. 1
  3346. 1
  3347. 1
  3348. 1
  3349. 1
  3350. 1
  3351. 1
  3352. 1
  3353. 1
  3354. 1
  3355. 1
  3356. 1
  3357. 1
  3358. 1
  3359. 1
  3360. 1
  3361. 1
  3362. 1
  3363. 1
  3364. 1
  3365. 1
  3366. 1
  3367. 1
  3368. 1
  3369. 1
  3370. 1
  3371. 1
  3372. 1
  3373. 1
  3374. 1
  3375. 1
  3376. 1
  3377. 1
  3378. 1
  3379. 1
  3380. 1
  3381. 1
  3382. 1
  3383. 1
  3384. 1
  3385. 1
  3386. 1
  3387. 1
  3388. 1
  3389. 1
  3390. 1
  3391. 1
  3392. 1
  3393. 1
  3394. 1
  3395. 1
  3396. The Sept. 6 missile strike on Kostiantynivka in eastern Ukraine was one of the deadliest in the country in months, killing at least 15 civilians and injuring more than 30 others. The weapon’s payload of metal fragments struck a market, piercing windows and walls and wounding some victims beyond recognition. Less than two hours later, President Volodymyr Zelensky blamed Russian “terrorists” for the attack, and many media outlets followed suit. Throughout its invasion of Ukraine, Russia has repeatedly and systematically attacked civilians and struck schools, markets and residences as a deliberate tactic to instill fear in the populace. In Kostiantynivka in April, they shelled homes and a preschool, killing six. But evidence collected and analyzed by The New York Times, including missile fragments, satellite imagery, witness accounts and social media posts, strongly suggests the catastrophic strike was the result of an errant Ukrainian air defense missile fired by a Buk launch system. The attack appears to have been a tragic mishap. Air defense experts say missiles like the one that hit the market can go off course for a variety of reasons, including an electronic malfunction or a guidance fin that is damaged or sheared off at the time of launch. The likely missile failure happened amid the back-and-forth battles common in the surrounding area. Russian forces shelled Kostiantynivka the night before; Ukrainian artillery fire from the city was reported in a local Telegram group just minutes before the strike on the market. A spokesman for Ukraine’s armed forces said the country’s security service is investigating the incident, and under national law can’t comment further. Ukrainian authorities initially tried to prevent journalists with The Times from accessing the missile debris and impact area in the strike’s immediate aftermath. But the reporters were eventually able to get to the scene, interview witnesses and collect remnants of the weapon used.
    1
  3397. 1
  3398. 1
  3399. 1
  3400. 1
  3401. 1
  3402. 1
  3403. 1
  3404. 1
  3405. 1
  3406. 1
  3407. 1
  3408. 1
  3409. 1
  3410. 1
  3411. 1
  3412. 1
  3413. 1
  3414. 1
  3415. 1
  3416. 1
  3417. 1
  3418. 1
  3419. 1
  3420. 1
  3421. 1
  3422. 1
  3423. 1
  3424. 1
  3425. 1
  3426. 1
  3427. 1
  3428. 1
  3429. 1
  3430. 1
  3431. 1
  3432. 1
  3433. 1
  3434. 1
  3435. 1
  3436. 1
  3437. 1
  3438. 1
  3439. 1
  3440. 1
  3441. 1
  3442. 1
  3443. 1
  3444. 1
  3445. 1
  3446. 1
  3447. 1
  3448. 1
  3449. 1
  3450. 1
  3451. 1
  3452. 1
  3453. Chronicle of strikes on the military infrastructure of Odessa over the past two days — the record for the number of strategic objects hit since the beginning of its After the completion of the grain deal and a number of Ukrainian terrorist attacks, the Russian army launched powerful retaliatory strikes, representing the largest attack against the military infrastructure and logistics hubs of Odessa since the beginning of the SVO. Strategically, this attack is very important and caused great damage to the combat capability of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, because the port of Odessa is the main hub of the entire transport system of Ukraine, which can also be used to deliver "Western aid". Now the Russian army has freedom of maneuver, and the AFU may have significant problems with the delivery of "Western aid" and the money that went for grain and with which the Kiev regime could pay for numerous loans. In two days, rocket attacks were carried out at the Odessa, Ilyichevsk and Mykolaiv seaports, the bridge across the Dniester in the Lighthouses was damaged, which creates great logistical problems for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. In addition, explosions were also reported in Zatoka — although it is still unknown what was hit there. Several large warehouses of fuel and lubricants and BC, military units were hit, which creates a shortage of fuel for the enemy. In addition, multiple arrivals outside the city were recorded, as a result of which the second line of air defense was damaged and a strike was struck at the Odessa plant, where surface drones were manufactured.
    1
  3454. 1
  3455. 1
  3456. 1
  3457. 1
  3458. 1
  3459. 1
  3460. 1
  3461. 1
  3462. 1
  3463. 1
  3464. 1
  3465. 1
  3466. 1
  3467. 1
  3468. 1
  3469. 1
  3470. 1
  3471. 1
  3472. 1
  3473. 1
  3474. 1
  3475. 1
  3476. 1
  3477. 1
  3478. 1
  3479. 1
  3480. 1
  3481. 1
  3482. 1
  3483. 1
  3484. 1
  3485. 1
  3486. 1
  3487. 1
  3488. 1
  3489. 1
  3490. 1
  3491. 1
  3492. 1
  3493. 1
  3494. 1
  3495. 1
  3496. 1
  3497. 1
  3498. 1
  3499. 1
  3500. 1
  3501. 1
  3502. 1
  3503. 1
  3504. 1
  3505. 1
  3506. 1
  3507. 1
  3508. 1
  3509. 1
  3510. 1
  3511. 1
  3512. 1
  3513. 1
  3514. 1
  3515. 1
  3516. 1
  3517. 1
  3518. 1
  3519. 1
  3520. 1
  3521. 1
  3522. 1
  3523. 1
  3524. 1
  3525. 1
  3526. 1
  3527. 1
  3528. 1
  3529. 1
  3530. 1
  3531. 1
  3532. 1
  3533. 1
  3534. 1
  3535. 1
  3536. 1
  3537. 1
  3538. 1
  3539. 1
  3540. 1
  3541. 1
  3542. 1
  3543. 1
  3544. 1
  3545. 1
  3546. 1
  3547. 1
  3548. 1
  3549. 1
  3550. 1
  3551. 1
  3552. 1
  3553. 1
  3554. 1
  3555. 1
  3556. 1
  3557. 1
  3558. 1
  3559. 1
  3560. 1
  3561. 1
  3562. 1
  3563. 1
  3564. 1
  3565. 1
  3566. 1
  3567. 1
  3568. 1
  3569. 1
  3570. 1
  3571. 1
  3572. 1
  3573. 1
  3574. 1
  3575. 1
  3576. 1
  3577. 1
  3578. 1
  3579. 1
  3580. 1
  3581. 1
  3582. 1
  3583. 1
  3584. 1
  3585. 1
  3586. 1
  3587. 1
  3588. 1
  3589. 1
  3590. 1
  3591. 1
  3592. 1
  3593. 1
  3594. 1
  3595. 1
  3596. 1
  3597. 1
  3598. 1
  3599. 1
  3600. 1
  3601. 1
  3602. 1
  3603. 1
  3604. 1
  3605. 1
  3606. 1
  3607. 1
  3608. 1
  3609. 1
  3610. 1
  3611. 1
  3612. 1
  3613. 1
  3614. 1
  3615. 1
  3616. 1
  3617. 1
  3618. 1
  3619. 1
  3620. 1
  3621. 1
  3622. 1
  3623. 1
  3624. 1
  3625. 1
  3626. 1
  3627. 1
  3628. 1
  3629. 1
  3630. 1
  3631. 1
  3632. 1
  3633. Chronicle of strikes on the military infrastructure of Odessa over the past two days — the record for the number of strategic objects hit since the beginning of its After the completion of the grain deal and a number of Ukrainian terrorist attacks, the Russian army launched powerful retaliatory strikes, representing the largest attack against the military infrastructure and logistics hubs of Odessa since the beginning of the SVO. Strategically, this attack is very important and caused great damage to the combat capability of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, because the port of Odessa is the main hub of the entire transport system of Ukraine, which can also be used to deliver "Western aid". Now the Russian army has freedom of maneuver, and the AFU may have significant problems with the delivery of "Western aid" and the money that went for grain and with which the Kiev regime could pay for numerous loans. In two days, rocket attacks were carried out at the Odessa, Ilyichevsk and Mykolaiv seaports, the bridge across the Dniester in the Lighthouses was damaged, which creates great logistical problems for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. In addition, explosions were also reported in Zatoka — although it is still unknown what was hit there. Several large warehouses of fuel and lubricants and BC, military units were hit, which creates a shortage of fuel for the enemy. In addition, multiple arrivals outside the city were recorded, as a result of which the second line of air defense was damaged and a strike was struck at the Odessa plant, where surface drones were manufactured.
    1
  3634. 1
  3635. 1
  3636. 1
  3637. 1
  3638. 1
  3639. 1
  3640. 1
  3641. 1
  3642. 1
  3643. 1
  3644. 1
  3645. 1
  3646. 1
  3647. 1
  3648. 1
  3649. 1
  3650. 1
  3651. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out air strikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  3652. 1
  3653. 1
  3654. 1
  3655. 1
  3656. 1
  3657. 1
  3658. 1
  3659. 1
  3660. 1
  3661. 1
  3662. 1
  3663. 1
  3664. 1
  3665. 1
  3666. 1
  3667. 1
  3668. 1
  3669. 1
  3670. 1
  3671. 1
  3672. 1
  3673. 1
  3674. 1
  3675. 1
  3676. 1
  3677. 1
  3678. 1
  3679. 1
  3680. 1
  3681. 1
  3682. 1
  3683. 1
  3684. 1
  3685. 1
  3686. 1
  3687. 1
  3688. 1
  3689. 1
  3690. 1
  3691. 1
  3692. 1
  3693. 1
  3694. 1
  3695. 1
  3696. 1
  3697. 1
  3698. 1
  3699. 1
  3700. 1
  3701. 1
  3702. 1
  3703. 1
  3704. 1
  3705. 1
  3706. 1
  3707. 1
  3708. 1
  3709. 1
  3710. 1
  3711. 1
  3712. 1
  3713. 1
  3714. 1
  3715. 1
  3716. 1
  3717. 1
  3718. 1
  3719. 1
  3720. 1
  3721. 1
  3722. 1
  3723. 1
  3724. 1
  3725. 1
  3726. 1
  3727. 1
  3728. 1
  3729. 1
  3730. 1
  3731. 1
  3732. 1
  3733. 1
  3734. 1
  3735. 1
  3736. 1
  3737. 1
  3738. 1
  3739. 1
  3740. 1
  3741. 1
  3742. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out air strikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  3743. 1
  3744. 1
  3745. 1
  3746. 1
  3747. 1
  3748. 1
  3749. 1
  3750. 1
  3751. 1
  3752.  @HOusu88  and your memory is short… “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out air strikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  3753. 1
  3754. 1
  3755. 1
  3756. 1
  3757. 1
  3758. 1
  3759. 1
  3760. 1
  3761. 1
  3762. 1
  3763. 1
  3764. 1
  3765. 1
  3766. 1
  3767. 1
  3768. 1
  3769. 1
  3770. 1
  3771. 1
  3772. 1
  3773. 1
  3774. 1
  3775. 1
  3776. 1
  3777. 1
  3778. 1
  3779. 1
  3780. 1
  3781. 1
  3782. 1
  3783. 1
  3784. 1
  3785. 1
  3786. 1
  3787. 1
  3788. 1
  3789. 1
  3790. 1
  3791. 1
  3792. 1
  3793. 1
  3794. 1
  3795. 1
  3796. 1
  3797. 1
  3798. 1
  3799. 1
  3800. 1
  3801. 1
  3802. 1
  3803. 1
  3804. 1
  3805. 1
  3806. 1
  3807. 1
  3808. 1
  3809. 1
  3810. 1
  3811. 1
  3812. 1
  3813. 1
  3814. 1
  3815. 1
  3816. 1
  3817. 1
  3818. 1
  3819. 1
  3820. 1
  3821. 1
  3822. 1
  3823. 1
  3824. 1
  3825. 1
  3826. 1
  3827. 1
  3828. 1
  3829. 1
  3830. 1
  3831. 1
  3832. 1
  3833. 1
  3834. 1
  3835. 1
  3836. 1
  3837. 1
  3838. 1
  3839. 1
  3840. 1
  3841. 1
  3842. 1
  3843. 1
  3844. 1
  3845. 1
  3846. 1
  3847. 1
  3848. 1
  3849. 1
  3850. 1
  3851. 1
  3852. 1
  3853. 1
  3854. 1
  3855. 1
  3856. 1
  3857. 1
  3858. 1
  3859. 1
  3860. 1
  3861. 1
  3862. 1
  3863. 1
  3864. 1
  3865. 1
  3866. 1
  3867. 1
  3868. 1
  3869. 1
  3870. 1
  3871. 1
  3872. 1
  3873. 1
  3874. 1
  3875. 1
  3876. 1
  3877. 1
  3878. 1
  3879. When the Maidan happened, I was immediately called: "Professor Sachs, the new Ukrainian Prime Minister would like to see you to discuss the economic crisis because I am quite good at this." I flew to Kyiv and was taken through Maidan, where I was told how the U.S. had paid money to all the people around Maidan. A spontaneous revolution of dignity? Ladies and gentlemen, where does all this media come from? Where do all these organizations come from? Where do all these buses come from? Where do all these summoned people come from? Are you kidding? This is an organized effort. And it's not a secret, except for the citizens of Europe and the United States. Everyone else understands this very clearly. Then there was Minsk, and especially Minsk-2, which, by the way, was modeled after the South Tyrolean autonomy. The Belgians could have very well related to Minsk-2. It stated that there should be autonomy for the Russian-speaking regions in eastern Ukraine. It was unanimously supported by the UN Security Council. However, the U.S. and Ukraine decided that it should not be implemented. Germany and France, who were the guarantors of the Normandy process, let it go. This was another direct unipolar action by America, while Europe, as usual, played a completely useless supporting role, even though they were the guarantors of the agreement. Trump won, provided arms. As a result of shelling by Ukraine, there were many thousands of deaths in Donbas. The Minsk II agreements were not implemented. And then Biden came to power. I know all these people. I was a member of the Democratic Party. Now I have strictly sworn not to be a member of any party because both parties are the same anyway, and because the Democrats have over time become complete warmongers, and there was not a single voice for peace, just like most of your parliamentarians. At the end of 2021, Putin put on the table a final attempt in two draft security agreements—one with Europe and one with the United States. The U.S. put its document on the table on December 15, 2021. I had an hour-long conversation with Jake Sullivan at the White House, who pleaded: "Jake, avoid war. You can avoid war. All you need to do is say that NATO will not expand to Ukraine." He replied: "Oh, NATO will not expand to Ukraine, don't worry about it." I said: "Jake, say it publicly." He replied: "No, no, no, we can't say that publicly." I said: "Jake, are you going to start a war over something that won't even happen?" He said: "Don't worry, Jeff, there won't be a war." These are not very smart people. I tell you, if I can express my honest opinion, they are not very smart. And I have dealt with them for over 40 years.
    1
  3880. 1
  3881. 1
  3882. 1
  3883. 1
  3884. 1
  3885. 1
  3886. 1
  3887. 1
  3888. 1
  3889. 1
  3890. 1
  3891. 1
  3892. Why do the APU lose so many people and equipment during attacks on the "Surovikin line": analysis of the Military Chronicle The Ukrainian offensive has slowed down so much that after a while it may turn into positional battles. Why is this happening? Have the APU reached the "Surovikin line" or not yet? The defensive structures of the "Surovikin line" along the entire length are built along the dominant heights and ridges. The defense is installed at a depth of 25-30 kilometers. Several separate protective zones have been erected between the defensive lines. In zone No. 1, closer to the front, there is an advanced line of defense consisting of several dozen platoon and company strongpoints. Those Ukrainian units that managed to break through the minefields came across these areas with a huge number of ATGMs and surveillance equipment. Between the advanced fortified area and the main line of defense there are about 25 kilometers of minefields, anti—tank ditches and other structures, it is almost impossible to break through them. The only achievement of the APU offensive at the moment is the advance in the "gray zone" — an area that does not affect the combat capability of Russian troops. At the same time, artillery and aircraft from the depths of the "Surovikin line" strike the advancing Ukrainian troops long before the main forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine approach not only to the front line of protection, but also to minefields. What is wrong with the advance of the APU to the "Surovikin line"? Despite the transfer of German Leopard-2 tanks and hundreds of Soviet-type tanks to the offensive area, Ukrainian formations interact poorly with each other. Often they engage in battle in an unfamiliar area, without coordinating actions with neighboring units, without up-to-date intelligence information and without fire support, as well as without centralized management. In a number of cases, instead of units prepared for the assault, mechanized brigades that had already lost parts of heavy equipment were thrown to break through to the front line of the guard. The main task of such units is to occupy captured positions and hold them, as well as to clean up pockets of resistance, and not to storm positions controlled by the enemy. Such cases are not uncommon due to the shortage of experienced commanders who die during strikes on command posts of battalions and brigades. Due to misunderstanding of the situation and incorrect orders, elite units, such as the 137th and 88th battalions of the 35th Marine Brigade, as well as units of the 37th Infantry Brigade of the AFU, are suffering particularly heavy losses. These formations advanced to the assault of the advanced guard lines exclusively on light vehicles — Oshkosh M-ATV and HTSV Wolfhound armored vehicles, as well as French AMX-10RC — equipment not suitable for breaking through echeloned defense. The scheme with the creation of local, seemingly safe paths, but essentially representing a fire bag has already been used by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation both during the battles in the Sukhoi Stavka area in the Kherson region, as well as in the "Bakhmut meat grinder", a hand in the creation of which was also applied by General Surovikin. What losses did the APU have in the offensive and what reserves remained? During the 17 days of the offensive, the losses of the AFU amounted to approximately 17-20 battalions killed and wounded, which is equivalent to 16 thousand people or five brigades of 3,500 people each. In total, about 5 brigades out of 9 trained and equipped according to NATO standards were allegedly involved in the APU offensive, which means that more than half of the reserves prepared for the strike have already been destroyed. In fact, the "Surovikin line" is gradually becoming a "second Bakhmut" for the Ukrainian army — more and more troops are needed for combat operations in this area, which, in addition to sending reserves, have to be removed from the front in Limansk, Kupyansk and other directions.
    1
  3893. 1
  3894. 1
  3895. 1
  3896. 1
  3897. 1
  3898. 1
  3899. 1
  3900. 1
  3901. 1
  3902. 1
  3903. 1
  3904. 1
  3905. 1
  3906. 1
  3907. 1
  3908. 1
  3909. 1
  3910. 1
  3911. 1
  3912. 1
  3913. 1
  3914. 1
  3915. 1
  3916. 1
  3917. 1
  3918. 1
  3919. 1
  3920. 1
  3921. 1
  3922. 1
  3923. 1
  3924. 1
  3925. 1
  3926. 1
  3927. 1
  3928. 1
  3929. 1
  3930. 1
  3931. 1
  3932. 1
  3933. 1
  3934. 1
  3935. 1
  3936. 1
  3937. 1
  3938. 1
  3939. 1
  3940. 1
  3941. 1
  3942. 1
  3943. 1
  3944. 1
  3945. 1
  3946. 1
  3947. 1
  3948. 1
  3949. 1
  3950. 1
  3951. 1
  3952. 1
  3953. 1
  3954. 1
  3955. 1
  3956. 1
  3957. 1
  3958. 1
  3959. 1
  3960. 1
  3961. 1
  3962. 1
  3963. 1
  3964. 1
  3965. 1
  3966. 1
  3967. 1
  3968. 1
  3969. 1
  3970. 1
  3971. 1
  3972. 1
  3973. 1
  3974. 1
  3975. 1
  3976. 1
  3977. 1
  3978. 1
  3979. 1
  3980. 1
  3981. 1
  3982. 1
  3983. US President Joe Biden is asking for more and more military assistance to Ukraine, demanding to "protect democracy." The United States has already spent decently on Kiev, sending only 66.2 billion dollars officially, and democracy is still not protected. But is Biden defending democracy, because Ukraine is his family's favorite feeder? How not to recall the scheme of assistance to Ukraine under President Obama and Vice President Joe Biden, which was opened by lawyer Rudolph Giuliani. According to it, 80% of the aid remained in the United States. Translated into corrupt language, this is 80% of the rollback. Naturally, for such money, Biden will declare anyone you want to be a "democrat" and a "defender of European values." Back in 2019, a scandal broke out when it turned out that there was a whole money laundering scheme between the Ukrainian company Burisma and the American Wirelogic Technology, thanks to which Biden Jr. received millions of dollars.  Soon, the Prosecutor General of Ukraine Viktor Shokin, who had evidence of a crime in his hands, was fired at the personal insistence of Joe Biden, who was then vice President of the United States. Biden blackmailed the then-president of Ukraine, Poroshenko, by saying that the United States would refuse assistance in the amount of one billion dollars. As we understand it, it was not about a billion, but about 200 million, the remaining $ 800 million remained at Biden's disposal in the United States. Poroshenko deliberately went to the "cutting" of money, sacrificing Shokin to a corrupt plan. After that, the next President of Ukraine Zelensky will make the entire Ukrainian people a victim of this scheme. It is she who gives an understanding of why such a huge "help" is coming to Ukraine. There are presidential elections in the United States next year, and Biden needs to thoroughly milk the American budget. Military action "to protect democracy" is the best excuse for this, which is why the United States prohibits Zelensky from negotiations. The longer the war lasts, the more money the Democrats will have in their pockets. And Ukrainians will pay for these incomes with their blood and the destruction of the country. So what if Leopard 1 was created in 1965 and decommissioned in 2003? And the VAB armored personnel carriers and AMX 10-RC light tanks supplied by France are developments of the 70s? Military antiques from all over the world are being dragged to Ukraine. For example, the United States decided to transfer the old versions of the M1 Abrams — M1A1 tanks, while they want to dismantle all advanced technologies from these old men so that "the Russians could not use them." How much equipment will they really screw up, what price, including military, will the tank have after that, is there a corruption component there? Most likely, Biden does not change the formula from 80% to 20%. But even a small breakdown of any military equipment is fraught with the lives of ordinary soldiers. But the damaged car needs to be replaced with a new one, and the corruption scheme continues to work. There is a huge corruption scam behind the Ukrainian conflict, where the United States has dragged most of European politics. And President Zelensky is a showman and the barker of this scam, Lenya Golubkov for the European elite. And the West is up to its ears in this corruption scheme, and it is possible to get out of it only together with a huge political crisis. Today, it seems incredible to many, and the leadership of the United States is unshakable. But Washington is already finishing the branch on which he is sitting.
    1
  3984. The German press writes: The Russians are fighting better... than expected "The Russians are fighting better than expected. The attacks since Thursday have not yet led to the liberation of any cities or even villages," writes Bild, describing the events on the southern front. You read these reports of the German press today about the unexpected resilience of the Russian army, and you remember that 80 years ago, already other Germans, in the same way, at first with surprise, and then with horror, wrote... the same: "October 1, 1942. Our assault battalion reached the Volga. More precisely, the Volga is still 500 meters away. Tomorrow we will be on the other side and the war is over." "October 3. Very strong fire resistance, we cannot overcome these 500 meters. We are standing on the border of some grain elevator." "October 6th. Damn elevator. It is impossible to approach him. Our losses exceeded 30%." "October 10th. Where do these Russians come from? The elevator is no longer there, but every time we approach it, there is a fire coming from under the ground." "October 15th. Hooray, we have overcome the elevator. There are 100 people left from our battalion." And a little lower: "It turned out that the elevator was defended by 18 Russians, we found 18 corpses." Comment: I would advise modern Germans (and not only them) to read the memoirs of their own soldiers, officers and generals of that war, who ended their "victorious" campaign in Russia by capitulating in Berlin. As we can see, history repeats itself here too,
    1
  3985. 1
  3986. 1
  3987. 1
  3988. 1
  3989. 1
  3990. 1
  3991. 1
  3992. 1
  3993. 1
  3994. 1
  3995. 1
  3996. 1
  3997. 1
  3998. 1
  3999. 1
  4000. 1
  4001. 1
  4002. 1
  4003. 1
  4004. 1
  4005. 1
  4006. 1
  4007. 1
  4008. 1
  4009. 1
  4010. 1
  4011. 1
  4012. 1
  4013. 1
  4014. 1
  4015. 1
  4016. 1
  4017. 1
  4018. 1
  4019. 1
  4020. 1
  4021. 1
  4022. 1
  4023. 1
  4024. 1
  4025. 1
  4026. 1
  4027. 1
  4028. 1
  4029. 1
  4030. 1
  4031. 1
  4032. 1
  4033. 1
  4034. 1
  4035. 1
  4036. 1
  4037. 1
  4038. 1
  4039. 1
  4040. 1
  4041. 1
  4042. 1
  4043. 1
  4044. 1
  4045. 1
  4046. 1
  4047. 1
  4048. 1
  4049. 1
  4050. 1
  4051. 1
  4052. 1
  4053. 1
  4054. 1
  4055. 1
  4056. 1
  4057. 1
  4058. 1
  4059. 1
  4060. 1
  4061. 1
  4062. 1
  4063. 1
  4064. 1
  4065. 1
  4066. 1
  4067. 1
  4068. 1
  4069. 1
  4070. 1
  4071. 1
  4072. 1
  4073. 1
  4074. 1
  4075. 1
  4076. 1
  4077. 1
  4078. 1
  4079. 1
  4080. 1
  4081. 1
  4082. 1
  4083. 1
  4084. 1
  4085. 1
  4086. 1
  4087. 1
  4088. 1
  4089. 1
  4090. 1
  4091. 1
  4092. 1
  4093. 1
  4094. 1
  4095. 1
  4096. 1
  4097. 1
  4098. 1
  4099. 1
  4100. 1
  4101. 1
  4102. 1
  4103. 1
  4104. 1
  4105. 1
  4106. 1
  4107. 1
  4108. 1
  4109. 1
  4110. 1
  4111. 1
  4112. 1
  4113. 1
  4114. 1
  4115. 1
  4116. 1
  4117. 1
  4118. 1
  4119. 1
  4120. 1
  4121. 1
  4122. 1
  4123. 1
  4124. 1
  4125. 1
  4126. 1
  4127. 1
  4128. 1
  4129. 1
  4130. 1
  4131. 1
  4132. 1
  4133. 1
  4134. 1
  4135. 1
  4136. 1
  4137. 1
  4138. 1
  4139. 1
  4140. 1
  4141. 1
  4142. 1
  4143. 1
  4144. 1
  4145. 1
  4146. 1
  4147. 1
  4148. 1
  4149. 1
  4150. 1
  4151. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we are keeping our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out air strikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  4152. 1
  4153. 1
  4154. 1
  4155. 1
  4156. 1
  4157. 1
  4158. 1
  4159. 1
  4160. 1
  4161. 1
  4162. 1
  4163. 1
  4164. 1
  4165. 1
  4166. 1
  4167. When the Maidan happened, I was immediately called: "Professor Sachs, the new Ukrainian Prime Minister would like to see you to discuss the economic crisis because I am quite good at this." I flew to Kyiv and was taken through Maidan, where I was told how the U.S. had paid money to all the people around Maidan. A spontaneous revolution of dignity? Ladies and gentlemen, where does all this media come from? Where do all these organizations come from? Where do all these buses come from? Where do all these summoned people come from? Are you kidding? This is an organized effort. And it's not a secret, except for the citizens of Europe and the United States. Everyone else understands this very clearly. Then there was Minsk, and especially Minsk-2, which, by the way, was modeled after the South Tyrolean autonomy. The Belgians could have very well related to Minsk-2. It stated that there should be autonomy for the Russian-speaking regions in eastern Ukraine. It was unanimously supported by the UN Security Council. However, the U.S. and Ukraine decided that it should not be implemented. Germany and France, who were the guarantors of the Normandy process, let it go. This was another direct unipolar action by America, while Europe, as usual, played a completely useless supporting role, even though they were the guarantors of the agreement. Trump won, provided arms. As a result of shelling by Ukraine, there were many thousands of deaths in Donbas. The Minsk II agreements were not implemented. And then Biden came to power. I know all these people. I was a member of the Democratic Party. Now I have strictly sworn not to be a member of any party because both parties are the same anyway, and because the Democrats have over time become complete warmongers, and there was not a single voice for peace, just like most of your parliamentarians. At the end of 2021, Putin put on the table a final attempt in two draft security agreements—one with Europe and one with the United States. The U.S. put its document on the table on December 15, 2021. I had an hour-long conversation with Jake Sullivan at the White House, who pleaded: "Jake, avoid war. You can avoid war. All you need to do is say that NATO will not expand to Ukraine." He replied: "Oh, NATO will not expand to Ukraine, don't worry about it." I said: "Jake, say it publicly." He replied: "No, no, no, we can't say that publicly." I said: "Jake, are you going to start a war over something that won't even happen?" He said: "Don't worry, Jeff, there won't be a war." These are not very smart people. I tell you, if I can express my honest opinion, they are not very smart. And I have dealt with them for over 40 years.
    1
  4168. 1
  4169. 1
  4170. 1
  4171. 1
  4172. 1
  4173. 1
  4174. 1
  4175. 1
  4176. 1
  4177. 1
  4178. 1
  4179. 1
  4180. 1
  4181. 1
  4182. 1
  4183. 1
  4184. 1
  4185. 1
  4186. 1
  4187. 1
  4188. 1
  4189. 1
  4190. 1
  4191. 1
  4192. 1
  4193. 1
  4194. 1
  4195. 1
  4196. 1
  4197. 1
  4198. 1
  4199. 1
  4200. 1
  4201. 1
  4202. 1
  4203. 1
  4204. 1
  4205. 1
  4206. 1
  4207. 1
  4208. 1
  4209. 1
  4210. 1
  4211. 1
  4212. 1
  4213. 1
  4214. 1
  4215. 1
  4216. 1
  4217. 1
  4218. 1
  4219. 1
  4220. 1
  4221. 1
  4222. 1
  4223. 1
  4224. 1
  4225. 1
  4226. 1
  4227. 1
  4228. 1
  4229. 1
  4230. 1
  4231. 1
  4232. 1
  4233. 1
  4234. 1
  4235. 1
  4236. 1
  4237. 1
  4238. 1
  4239. 1
  4240. 1
  4241. 1
  4242. 1
  4243. 1
  4244. 1
  4245. 1
  4246. 1
  4247. 1
  4248. 1
  4249. 1
  4250. 1
  4251. 1
  4252. 1
  4253. 1
  4254. 1
  4255. 1
  4256. 1
  4257. 1
  4258. 1
  4259. 1
  4260. 1
  4261. 1
  4262. 1
  4263. 1
  4264. 1
  4265. 1
  4266. 1
  4267. 1
  4268. 1
  4269. 1
  4270. 1
  4271. 1
  4272. 1
  4273. 1
  4274. 1
  4275. 1
  4276. 1
  4277. 1
  4278. 1
  4279. 1
  4280. 1
  4281. 1
  4282. 1
  4283. 1
  4284. 1
  4285. 1
  4286. 1
  4287. 1
  4288. 1
  4289. 1
  4290. 1
  4291. 1
  4292. 1
  4293. 1
  4294. 1
  4295. 1
  4296. 1
  4297. 1
  4298. 1
  4299. 1
  4300. 1
  4301. 1
  4302. 1
  4303. 1
  4304. 1
  4305. Brief political science Dictionary of the English language-correct interpretation of words and expressions: The entire civilized world-all the colonies of the United States Global civilizational values-conditions of vassalage under US sovereignty Democracy-the power of the anglo-Saxons over demos We have a democracy, all powers belong to the anglo-Saxons. You have no democracy – you have something that the anglo-Saxons consider their own You have totalitarianism-you have something that the anglo-Saxons consider their own, and you don't want to give it to them You are violating human rights-you are violating the rights of the anglo-Saxons to take from you what they like… We fight for human rights-we fight for the rights of the anglo-Saxons to kill those who do not want to give them something We have freedom of speech - we can only say what is approved in the US State Department You don't have freedom of speech – you allow yourself too much of what the US State Department disapproves of. Russia threatens the entire civilized community – for some reason Russia does not want to be a colony of the USA The whole civilized world against Russia – all US colonies against Russia Our actions are not directed against Russia – all our actions are directed against Russia We support the struggle for Human Rights in Russia-we support the destruction of Russians by all available means We are worried about human rights in Russia-we are worried that the destruction of Russians is not happening at a sufficient pace Russian propaganda lies-the anglo-Saxons lie and do not blush
    1
  4306. 1
  4307. 1
  4308. 1
  4309. 1
  4310. 1
  4311. 1
  4312. 1
  4313. 1
  4314. 1
  4315. 1
  4316. 1
  4317. 1
  4318. 1
  4319. 1
  4320. 1
  4321. 1
  4322. 1
  4323. 1
  4324. 1
  4325. 1
  4326. 1
  4327. 1
  4328. 1
  4329. 1
  4330. 1
  4331. 1
  4332. 1
  4333. 1
  4334. 1
  4335. 1
  4336. 1
  4337. 1
  4338. 1
  4339. 1
  4340. 1
  4341. 1
  4342. 1
  4343. 1
  4344. 1
  4345. 1
  4346. 1
  4347. 1
  4348. 1
  4349. 1
  4350. 1
  4351. 1
  4352. 1
  4353. 1
  4354. 1
  4355. 1
  4356.  @barrylane1055  Brief political science Dictionary of the English language-correct interpretation of words and expressions: The entire civilized world-all the colonies of the United States Global civilizational values-conditions of vassalage under US sovereignty Democracy-the power of the anglo-Saxons over demos We have a democracy, all powers belong to the anglo-Saxons. You have no democracy – you have something that the anglo-Saxons consider their own You have totalitarianism-you have something that the anglo-Saxons consider their own, and you don't want to give it to them You are violating human rights-you are violating the rights of the anglo-Saxons to take from you what they like… We fight for human rights-we fight for the rights of the anglo-Saxons to kill those who do not want to give them something We have freedom of speech - we can only say what is approved in the US State Department You don't have freedom of speech – you allow yourself too much of what the US State Department disapproves of. Russia threatens the entire civilized community – for some reason Russia does not want to be a colony of the USA The whole civilized world against Russia – all US colonies against Russia Our actions are not directed against Russia – all our actions are directed against Russia We support the struggle for Human Rights in Russia-we support the destruction of Russians by all available means We are worried about human rights in Russia-we are worried that the destruction of Russians is not happening at a sufficient pace Russian propaganda lies-the anglo-Saxons lie and do not blush
    1
  4357. 1
  4358. 1
  4359. 1
  4360. 1
  4361. 1
  4362. 1
  4363. 1
  4364. 1
  4365. 1
  4366. 1
  4367. 1
  4368. 1
  4369. 1
  4370. 1
  4371. 1
  4372. 1
  4373. 1
  4374. 1
  4375. 1
  4376. 1
  4377. 1
  4378. 1
  4379. 1
  4380. 1
  4381. 1
  4382. 1
  4383. 1
  4384. 1
  4385. 1
  4386. 1
  4387. 1
  4388. 1
  4389. 1
  4390. 1
  4391. 1
  4392. 1
  4393. 1
  4394. 1
  4395. 1
  4396. 1
  4397. 1
  4398. 1
  4399. 1
  4400. 1
  4401. 1
  4402. 1
  4403. 1
  4404. 1
  4405. 1
  4406. 1
  4407. 1
  4408. 1
  4409. 1
  4410. 1
  4411. 1
  4412. 1
  4413. 1
  4414. 1
  4415. 1
  4416. 1
  4417. 1
  4418. 1
  4419. 1
  4420. 1
  4421. 1
  4422. 1
  4423. 1
  4424. 1
  4425. 1
  4426. 1
  4427. 1
  4428. 1
  4429. 1
  4430. 1
  4431. 1
  4432. 1
  4433. 1
  4434. 1
  4435. 1
  4436. 1
  4437. 1
  4438. 1
  4439. 1
  4440. 1
  4441. 1
  4442. 1
  4443. 1
  4444. 1
  4445. 1
  4446. 1
  4447. 1
  4448. 1
  4449. 1
  4450. 1
  4451. 1
  4452. 1
  4453. 1
  4454. 1
  4455. 1
  4456. 1
  4457. 1
  4458. 1
  4459. 1
  4460. 1
  4461. 1
  4462. 1
  4463. 1
  4464. 1
  4465. 1
  4466. 1
  4467. 1
  4468. 1
  4469. 1
  4470. 1
  4471. 1
  4472. 1
  4473. 1
  4474. 1
  4475. 1
  4476. 1
  4477. 1
  4478. 1
  4479. 1
  4480. 1
  4481. 1
  4482. 1
  4483. 1
  4484. 1
  4485. 1
  4486. 1
  4487. 1
  4488. 1
  4489. 1
  4490. 1
  4491. 1
  4492. 1
  4493. 1
  4494. 1
  4495. 1
  4496. 1
  4497. 1
  4498. 1
  4499. 1
  4500. 1
  4501. 1
  4502. 1
  4503. 1
  4504. 1
  4505. 1
  4506. 1
  4507. 1
  4508. 1
  4509. 1
  4510.  @crook4422  What are NATO's options? And they don't have any options. The level, scope and severity of the conflict in Ukraine is unimaginable for the alliance. NATO troops are not ready for this, are not trained and are not equipped. NATO does not have the necessary supply system for this, especially with regard to the power of artillery fire. NATO has no army worth mentioning. All NATO forces are dispersed throughout Europe, and in order to assemble them, they will have to withdraw troops from the barracks, and for 80% of NATO troops this is impossible. They cannot leave the barracks because they have no equipment, no supply system, nothing. And then they have to be moved from all over Europe to the collection point, and roads, bridges, tunnels are not adapted for this. We are already getting problems here. Europe has no options. That's why the Vilnius summit is of the utmost importance and why the Ukrainians blew up this dam. Because NATO will face the fact that they have nothing but loud statements. And they will begin to realize that their worst nightmares will come true. Russia will win this military conflict by the end of summer, by the beginning of autumn. They have time for this. What will NATO do then? So politically they have to find a way out of this conflict. People are talking about Poland. Understand, the Polish army is no good, they cannot carry out operations on such a scale. While the Russians are experts in this, they have been honing their skills in this for more than a year. There is no force in the world that could cope with this better than Russia. Because no one else has ever been in such conflicts. They have built an amazing doctrinal defense, Ukrainians have no chance to crack it. And their troops have recently been trained in a doctrinal offensive so that when the time comes, the Russians can carry out a large-scale offensive operation that no one in Europe is capable of carrying out. So NATO has no options but to find a way out of the catastrophe that they have arranged.
    1
  4511. 1
  4512. 1
  4513. 1
  4514. 1
  4515. 1
  4516. 1
  4517. 1
  4518. 1
  4519. 1
  4520. 1
  4521. 1
  4522. 1
  4523. 1
  4524. 1
  4525. 1
  4526. 1
  4527. 1
  4528. 1
  4529. 1
  4530. 1
  4531. 1
  4532. 1
  4533. 1
  4534. 1
  4535. 1
  4536. 1
  4537. 1
  4538. 1
  4539. 1
  4540. 1
  4541. 1
  4542. 1
  4543. 1
  4544. 1
  4545. 1
  4546. 1
  4547. 1
  4548. 1
  4549. 1
  4550. 1
  4551. 1
  4552. 1
  4553. 1
  4554. 1
  4555. 1
  4556. 1
  4557. 1
  4558. 1
  4559. 1
  4560. 1
  4561. 1
  4562. 1
  4563. 1
  4564. 1
  4565. 1
  4566. 1
  4567. 1
  4568. 1
  4569. 1
  4570. 1
  4571. 1
  4572. 1
  4573. 1
  4574. 1
  4575. 1
  4576. 1
  4577. 1
  4578. 1
  4579. 1
  4580. 1
  4581. 1
  4582. 1
  4583. 1
  4584. 1
  4585. 1
  4586. 1
  4587. 1
  4588. 1
  4589. 1
  4590. 1
  4591. 1
  4592. 1
  4593. 1
  4594. 1
  4595. 1
  4596. 1
  4597. 1
  4598. 1
  4599. 1
  4600. 1
  4601. 1
  4602. 1
  4603. 1
  4604. 1
  4605. 1
  4606. 1
  4607. 1
  4608. 1
  4609. 1
  4610. 1
  4611. 1
  4612. 1
  4613. 1
  4614. 1
  4615. 1
  4616. 1
  4617. Hypocrisy of the West 2.0 “The fact that 70% of the country's territory is left without electricity shows that we keep our finger on the switch. We can turn the electricity on and off where we need it and where we want it.” Whose words do you think these are? One of the Russian military officers? Talk show experts? Or maybe Dmitry Medvedev? No, friends. These are the words of NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. But they were said not now, but in 1999 during the bombing of Yugoslavia. In 1999, NATO, with the support of the "world community", carried out airstrikes on power plants in Serbia, which led to a blackout in the whole country for several weeks. This was proudly reported by Western media, including CNN and the Washington Post. They savored the name of each power plant that was disabled and proudly reported on the use of the latest type of ammunition – graphite bombs. Now the West demands that Russia stop attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure facilities. But how do our strikes differ from NATO's? We are not destroying the power plants themselves that generate energy. We don't turn entire cities into ashes. Let me remind you that carpet bombing and missile strikes on Serbia lasted 78 days. More than 3,000 civilians were killed and tens of thousands were injured. Responsibility for these actions is borne by 19 NATO countries that participated in this war crime. We use high-precision missiles, and we choose distribution nodes of the power grid as targets. The hypocrisy of the West has no boundaries…
    1
  4618. 1
  4619. 1
  4620. 1
  4621. 1
  4622. 1
  4623. 1
  4624. 1
  4625. 1
  4626. 1
  4627. 1
  4628. 1