Comments by "Roni Levarez" (@ronilevarez901) on "Chris Norlund" channel.

  1. But for some reason, humans that are discontent with "a few having everything" don't want things to become better. They just want to become one of the few. And let everyone else rot.
    6
  2. Well, how did you expect AI to learn to do uv, rigging and so on? From examples! There's nothing sinister in it. It's just tech. If anything, the sinister would be the users who want to do the "evil" things you mention.
    4
  3. Before quitting OpenAI (or right after?), he said that what they created was going to cause more harm than good to the world. He helped creating it. And he wasn't happy about it. Just a thought.
    4
  4.  @davidbellecy1709  Sure, but capitalism is not compatible with those ideas, lol.
    3
  5.  @victorkaranja1420  well, AI doesn't think about what images to generate. There's a person with a though process behind each AI image you see. Anyone can write a prompt. Not anyone can make a great image.
    2
  6. No. The AI they're using for filtering does it 😶
    2
  7.  @victorkaranja1420  unlike traditional "art" made by gore lovers, furry people, general porn addicts and worse, which have complex, high quality thoughts, right? 😂
    1
  8. Dude, the inferential system you described is how neural networks work. They never worked as you say, by merging images. That's what non AI algorithms do. Deep learning 101.
    1
  9. That's how it has worked since day one. But artists simply want all AI banned unless it gives them money.
    1
  10. It's impossible to make enough data to train AI since unlike humans it requires too many examples to learn. And the only source of so much diverse data is the internet.
    1