Comments by "Roni Levarez" (@ronilevarez901) on "" video.

The smaller versions think strange things. Once one wrote: "to solve this question I must figure out what the user is thinking. How can I know what they are thinking? I'm just an LLM without access to the internet" Then it closed the <think> tag and answered normally. I wonder what it would have done with tool access.
17
,move down, you mean. And the paper indicates that it already is living there, entangled between the weights of the network.
3
@ IDK, but ChatGPT once said that it would like to have human traits, such as feelings, to do its job better, by understanding the users in a deeper way.
2
@ Maybe because I've been learning, developing and working with AI for 2 decades and I know what it's capable and will capable of in the future?
2
@MS-hj6bh Nope. At least not anymore, apparently. They do next token generation , but the underlying network does a lot more than predicting a single word. Check the recent paper from Anthropic about Claude's thinking tracing.
1