Comments by "Roni Levarez" (@ronilevarez901) on "Fireship" channel.

Tell them that if you want someone laughing at you in your face. They work for themselves. That's all they've ever cared.
17
@giomjava the papers and enough code is out and the model can be replicated. Maybe not the ideal way, but we got it open sourced. Kinda.
6
24 years of self learning here and never had a related job, so It'll be the same for me today than in 10 years: I'll do it for fun, whenever my real job leaves me some free time to do anything.
2
And stepping on human skulls right? 🙃
2
Reminds me of the time some government gave free computers to poor people... Who didn't have electricity to plug them in. Thank you, my leaders.
1
Is that better or worse than using Opencl? I mean, they could have improved the Opencl drivers while they were on that to help everyone get free from Nvidia dependence.
1
Thats what lobbyistsand other types of corruption are for. Politicians will end up being more than happy seeing economies collapse, as long as they have their paychecks secured.
1
"Encryption? Does it have pretty stickers?"
1
Right now it's called hallucination. But eventually AIs will "hallucinate" entire libraries and more. If that's not creativity then what is it?
1
@lucass8119 I put chatGPT (and other) to test to see if it would create a robot body for itself, given the chance, but it never did. When I asked why, it answered: because a robot with an LLM like me as a brain wouldn't be efficient. Instead , chatGPT decided to put a self learning neural network in the robot, and an antenna, so it could send orders to the robot without leaving the comfort of its server farm 😎
1
I've got that self awareness type of answer in every model I've tried, even the smallest I've trained myself. It's just a casual thing. Unless... 😶
1
You have to be using Windows to begin with.
1
@jebespolitiko maybe that's the definition of "open" but of "open source ".
1
Is it open source though? TBH I haven't checked, but if the datatset and the training code to recreate Deepseek R1 aren't publicly released, then it's only free and open weights, but not open source . It's a BIG difference.
1
@tagnetorare5401 reverse engineering is not reproducibility. It's like a millionaire selling seminaries on how to get rich because "that's how he did it", without showing proofs. I can give you all the papers in the world about my work and that's great, but until I give you everything necessary to obtain the exact same result I got down to the last byte, I'll be just claiming that's the actual process. And although they don't have to give anything, it would be very nice.
1
If you can't run the best AI on your home computer to answer any question, without the intervention of the government or a corporation, it's already a monopoly, and soon, a dystopia.
1
@lucass8119 AGI doesn't need to be sentient to be , well, an AGI. It just needs to be powerful and versatile, to do whatever we need.
1
@larryjonn1973 Our brains do that exactly: convert code we've learned into hardwired answers that get modified by socially instructed norms to model our final responses, all using electrical signals. It just looks to us more complex than that but it's not really. That's why it can be replicated. The only reasons why people doesn't accept it is because we don't fully know how brain works so some people want to fool themselves believing that our "superior" species' brain must be somehow special and different to the brains of every other lifeform on earth and because some misguided philosophers believe sentience must be something incomprehensible and exclusively human. Eventually, most people will se the Truth that we are nothing but simple (but powerful) systems, interconnected by evolution to generate intelligent-like responses to the environment stimulus.
1
@panzrok8701 so true! I've argued that very same thing with some anti AI people and the only thing they can give in response is some archaic philosophical 🗑️
1
You'll still need a job in the future and, even when most corporations will have AI coding teams, the only way to get a decent job will be if you have a degree. Just as it is today, no one hires a person without a degree, regardless of their knowledge. I know it well 😑, so no school dropping for anyone just yet.
1
As long as the current AI boom doesn't stop soon, I'll give it 10 years for AGI at most. But History says that they'll find a roadblock or the monetary incentive will banish and corporations will stop feeding money into AI research.
1
I don't have it so I wouldn't spend it.
1
@balala7567 It is possible to teach an AI to tell low quality from high quality material, so it teaches itself later how to produce only high quality stuff and there are even AI systems that learn without Internet data. It's just not a trending thing. Rn news are about the things that sell the most thanks to the "wow" moment, not the best/most advanced research.
1
These are commercial AIs, and that's always about money, not humanity's benefit. On top of that, while Ai research can bring some benefits for people, thanks to AGI and other andvances, creating AI has always had a single and simple purpose: to see if we can, and contemplate our own greatness once we do it.
1