Comments by "naas699" (@naas699) on "Times Radio"
channel.
-
15
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gintasvilkelis2544 Jacques Baud - "on the 11th February President Biden announced Russia would attack Ukraine in the next few days - how did he know this? it is a mystery. But since the 16th, the artillery shelling of the population of the Donbas increased dramatically, as the daily reports of the OSCE observers show. Naturally beither the media, nor the Europen Union, nor NATO nor any Western Government reacts or intervenes. it was later said that this was Russian disinformation. In fact it seems that the European Union and some Western countries have delivberatley kept silent about the massacre of the Donbas population knowing that this would provoke a Russian intervention. At the same time, there were reports of sabotage in the Donbas. on the 16th January, Donbas fighters intercepted sabotuers who spoke Polish and were equiped with western equipment who were seeking to create chemical incidents in Gorlivka, they could have been CIA mercenaries, led or "advised" by Americans and composed of Ukranian or western fighters, to carry out sabotage actions in the Donbas Republics. In fact, as early as Feb 16, Biden knew that the Ukrainians had begun shelling the civilian population of the Donbas, putting Vladimir Putin in front of a difficult choice - to help the Donbas militarily and create an international problem or to stand by and watch the russian speaking people of the Donbas being crushed. If he decided to intervene, RU could invoce the International Obligation of "Responsibility to Protect" (R2P). But he knew that whatever its nature or scale, the intervention would trigger a storm of sanctions (all illegal). Therefore, whether Russian intervention were limited to the Donbas or went further to put pressure on the west forn the staus of Ukraine, the price to pay would be the same. That is what he explained in his speech on February 21."
1
-
1
-
@gintasvilkelis2544 Jaques Baud - "The whole conflict is the result of a scenario carefully worked out by the West. Its basic components were laid out in 2019 in two papers published by the RAND Corporation, the Pentagon think tank, entitled, Overextending and Unbalancing Russia and Extending Russia. These describe the sequence of events that led to the Russian offensive in February 2022. In addition to that, promises were made to Ukraine that it would become a member of NATO if it instigated a war that led to Russia’s defeat, as Oleksiy Arestovych explained in an interview with a Ukrainian television station in March 2019. In fact, Ukrainians were lied to, as Zelensky noted on CNN on March 21, 2022. As a matter of fact, the Russians knew for a long time that this confrontation would occur. That is why they prepared for it militarily and economically.”
Oh - don't forget the rest of the western lies - RU is the second best military fighting in UA and has lost 500,000 troops, yet now suddenly is is big enough and dangerous enough to take over all of Europe. Zelensky has lied from day 1 and reports UA's losses and failures as Russian
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
2022 Zaluzhny’s wish list to Economist for 2023, same as last year- 350 tanks, 600-700 infantry fighting vehicles, 500 howitzers, 1 million rounds of 155mm shells, large numbers Mig 29 fighters, saying he will reach Crimea - again! 2022 UA received ALL they requested and more, and have recaptured ZERO land. 1 week in October 2023 UA lost ¼ of the Leopard 2 tanks supplied by the west (US media) UA lost more fighter jets in October 2023 than what the west will supply in all of 2024. average age UA fighters 42 & is running out of soldiers. UA losses last report 10-1, over 400,000 killed and over 1 million wounded, UA now to conscript women, Media zone reports RU losses declined through Oct, losses on a downward trend even as they move from defence to offence. UA projects their losses onto RU. Latest report is that IF UA are resupplied weapons etc, they have no one there to use them (that would suit Zelensky as he can sell more on the black market). All UA can do is send in some troops on foot as any mechanised weapon will be targeted for destruction. UA troops run in, take some pics with a flag then retreat if they aren't killed - and the west laps it up
so these so called western experts are as delusional as Zelensky.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Putin united Europe - bullsh!t. NATO has ALWAYS been anti Russia, that is why the USA buys countries / politicians or dangles EU membership / $$ incentives if they sign up for NATO, this is why it has been expanding since 1992 even though RU requested to join NATO (USA declined as they need a bogeyman to justify their $$ trillion war machine & NATO needs a reason to be relevant). Europe - 7 countries (or NATO 31) against Russia, big deal, seeing as there are what - 190 plus countries in the world it means the other 160 are pro Russia. How is RU's economy now lets compare the USA / EU. It is only the EU countries that the USA has had to threaten / bully in going along with sanctions against Russia (& to donate their military equ to UA because the USA is too p!ssweak and gutless to go to war with Russia, and so the USA gets the $$ billion contracts to renew equipment & Congress get $$ millions in kickbacks) Good to see NATO following George Soros' New World Order from the 90's - to keep Russia down and to weaken it, NATO needs to use Eastern European soldiers with modern NATO weapons to go to war with Russia. NATO countries would never allow NATO bodybags to return to their lands, but Eastern European people don't matter apparently - so all is good in the world if the USA fights its war against Russia this way. it is the USA that is alienating themselves from the rest of the world (apart from the EU sheep) as the rest of the world is tired of their bullying, illegal wars, overthrowing Governments that refuse to kowtow to the US, arming and funding terrorists to cause instability. Americas answer to everything is WAR. and with ditching the US$, the US can no longer do their other illegal act of puting countries on sanctions / stealing their money in the banks etc
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
maybe as soon as the USA pays reparations for Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, and we can add to the list all of the countries the USA bombs. Vietnam is still suffering from American land mines - why isn't the USA over there removing them? was it Laos the most bombed country by the USA per capita (or maybe Cambodia). Don't forget how the USA has been dropping on average, 40 bombs a day, every day forthe past 20 years in Afghanistan Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Yemen, Pakistan, the list goes on - how about the USA pays reparations? Abducted children - you mean the abandoned children in a wr zone that RU removed, clothed, fed as they tried to find their parents? now lets compare that to all of the children pouring into the USA for the pedo's there.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@FishandHunt see you watch CNN, what are you talking about with Grain? the EU failed to live up to the agreement so RU were within their rights to stop it..RU is sending 50,000 tones each of FREE grain (including free delivery) to Burkina Faso, Zimbabwe, Mali, Central African Republic & Eritrea. over 70% of grain ends up in high paying markets including 44% to Europe while Sudan got less than 3%. Now with RU making sure the grain goes to Africa, the west can no longer lie and report how RU is weaponising food, like how they accused RU of weaponising energy when Nord Stream was in operation, unlike the USA who weaponises the US$ not only by stealing countries reserve currency but putting them on sanctions which is illegal and an act of war. RU has written off $20 billion debt to African nations, when was the last time the USA / West did anything for free? Churches - look at the pictures - if they were hit by a missile they wouldn't be there, the damage to civilians is because of un trained UA weapons operators or falling debris. But hey - nice try on the BS rant
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jamesives4375 “Not only are such groups inherently biased and therefore have an interest in falsifying evidence, but also the White Helmets were founded and are funded by, among others, the US and UK – both of which are highly active participants in orchestrating and promoting the war against Assad.” Charles Shoebridge, former British army and counter-terrorism intelligence officer tells Renegade Inc. that as previous OPCW investigations into alleged chlorine use have demonstrated, the evidence Assad’s forces carried out chemical attacks in Syria is not strong. “Ample imagery exists on social media suggesting chemical attacks on civilians have occurred, but in many cases, such imagery has been
demonstrably manipulated – and whether with willing or coerced actors, such footage is relatively easy to stage,” he says
you need to stop watching CNN dude,
1
-
@jamesives4375 White Helmet group have admitted Syria gas attack were fake. georgia - South Ossetia declared themselves independant as is their right for self determination - georgian troops attacked RU Peacekeepers in S Ossetia. Chechnya was against Islamist fighters - you seem to approve of the USA going to war against terrorist. Look at Grozny now - rebuilt by RU, now compare that to Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Libya, Yemen, Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq etc after the USA destroys them - the USA packs up & leaves, leaving the country far worse than before they went to war. Note how terrorists always appear in countries the USA wants to overthrow or use as a means for them to keep their troops in. The US uses terrorists as their excuse to illegally occupy Syria and Libya, yet their military bases amazingly are always where the oil fields are - thats because they are there stealing oil. What happened to the last 2 leaders who tried to sell oil in a currency other than the USD? Hussein and Gaddafi.the USA has no problem using invasions for "democracy" as their excuse - something you clearly approve of. if you believe 9/11 happened as reported by US media then it is hardly worth the effort in trying to have any meaningful conversation with you. the USA going to war with RU and saying they will go to war with China - 2 of the biggest nations involved in BRICS that means global trade will be done in currencies other than the USD, so the US going to war to try to maintain their hegemony. How many wars has RU been involved in since 1991? 5 - on their borders, USA 215, how many wars has China been involved in the past 40 years? ZERO - now compare that to the USA. Israel - maybe you should read the multiple articles on the UN website about this ongoing issues there. If you bother - you will see which country is responsible for taking land through acts of violence in the Golan Heights and the West bank, you'll see which country has ignotred International Law and UN Resolutions since 1947. Which country has killed on average 1 person a day in 2023 (before Oct 7), which country is an Apartheid regime and how the wall they built is illegal. Neslon Mandela - one of the worlds greatest leaders was arrested and jailed for planning acts of terrorism against his apartheid rulers. Oh - Hamas beheading children was a lie seeing as you obviously believe everything reported in western media
1
-
@jamesives4375 the USA has dropped on average 40 bombs a day every day for the past 20 years (& drone strikes), on Yemen, Somalia, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Libya, Lebanon, Palestine, the list goes on, and on, and on. During the first 20 years of the war on terror, the U.S. conducted more than 91,000 airstrikes across seven major conflict zones — Afghanistan, Iraq Libya, Pakistan, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen — according to a 2021 analysis by Airwars, a U.K.-based airstrike monitoring group. For a century the American way of war has meant killing civilians. Indiscriminate airstrikes has been a US hallmark from the “banana wars” to the forever wars. you know Americas forever wars where they go from one conflict to the next around the globe all so the US weapons manufacturers get the mega $ billion contracts and they donate $$ millions to congress. Assange pointed that out, that's why they want him to rot in a UK jail. Liz Cheneys net worth went from $7 million in 2017 to $44 million in 2021. All the USA has to offer the world is war, death and destruction. don't hear you complaining that the USA are illegally in Syria and Libya (if you want to know they are stealing oil)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
payment for damages - just like how the USA paid reparations to Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam - the list goes on. Vietnam is still suffering from US landmines - what are the USA doing about that? how about how the USA is dropping on average 40 bombs a day, every day for the past 20 years on Yeme, Libya, Afghanistan. Iraq, Syria, the list goes on. Don't see the USA offering anything to rebuild these countries they detroy
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ihavetowait90daystochangem8 by your logic 10 states in the USA will go back to Mexico, Hawaii back to the rightful owners, Alaska back to Russia, all of the USA back to the American Indians. look at a map of Europe in the 1900's - see how far RU borders reach - point out UA will you. the USA / west has no problem changing borders when it suits them. look at Europes borders before & after WW1 & WW2, who is it that changes European borders? Where's Yugoslavia? can't find it on a map? ask the USA & NATO. NATO that defensive alliance that actively goes to war around the globe. NATO illegally bombed Yugoslavia, USA illegally invaded Iraq even after the UN told the USA they had no justification. why is the USA saying they will next go to war with China over Taiwan? Who has China invaded over the past 40 years? now compare that to the USA wars (Lebanon,Grenada, Libya, Persian Gulf, Panama, Gulf war, Iraq, Somalia, Yugoslavia, Haiti, Serbia, Afghanistan, Yemen, Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia, Libya, Uganda, Niger, Iraq, Syria, Libya again) Don't forget how the USA is illegally in Syria and Libya stealing oil. . Even the US Govt web sites state Taiwan is part of China so why would China invade itself? the USA stated they will destroy Taiwans semiconductor industry - and as we speak the US is building semiconductor factories in the USA. Just as since 2014 US ports were building gas offloading facilities and as soon as they blow up Nord Stream, the US says to EU - never fear, you can now buy gas from us. All part of Americas forever wars - Assange ointed that out thats why the USA wants him to rot in a UK jail. Liz Cheneys net worth $7 million 2017 $44 million 2021 - who says Americas FOREVER WARS don't pay?
1
-
1
-
1
-
@GolemRising bullsht. Jacques Baud is a former colonel of the General Staff, ex-member of the Swiss strategic intelligence, specialist on Eastern countries. He was trained in the American and British intelligence services. He has served as Policy Chief for United Nations Peace Operations. He states the following in his article "Part One the Road to War" The qualifier “pro-Russian” suggests that Russia was a party to the conflict, which was not the case, and the term “Russian speakers” would have been more honest. Moreover, these referendums were conducted against the advice of Vladimir Putin.
In fact, these Republics were not seeking to separate from Ukraine, but to have a status of autonomy, guaranteeing them the use of the Russian language as an official language–because the first legislative act of the new government resulting from the American-sponsored overthrow of [the democratically-elected] President Yanukovych, was the abolition, on February 23, 2014, of the Kivalov-Kolesnichenko law of 2012 that made Russian an official language in Ukraine.
A bit as if German-speaking ‘putschists’ decided that French and Italian would no longer be official languages in Switzerland.
This decision caused a storm in the Russian-speaking population. The result was fierce repression against the Russian-speaking regions (Odessa, Dnepropetrovsk, Kharkov, Lugansk and Donetsk) which was carried out beginning in February 2014 and led to a militarization of the situation and some horrific massacres of the Russian population (in Odessa and Mariupol, the most notable).
At this stage, too rigid and engrossed in a doctrinaire approach to operations, the Ukrainian general staff subdued the enemy but without managing to actually prevail. The war waged by the autonomists [consisted in].… highly mobile operations conducted with light means. With a more flexible and less doctrinaire approach, the rebels were able to exploit the inertia of Ukrainian forces to repeatedly “trap” them.
In 2014, when I was at NATO, I was responsible for the fight against the proliferation of small arms, and we were trying to detect Russian arms deliveries to the rebels, to see if Moscow was involved.
The information we received then came almost entirely from Polish intelligence services and did not “fit” with the information coming from the OSCE [Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe]—and despite rather crude allegations, there were no deliveries of weapons and military equipment from Russia.
The rebels were armed thanks to the defection of Russian-speaking Ukrainian units that went over to the rebel side. As Ukrainian failures continued, tank, artillery, and anti-aircraft battalions swelled the ranks of the autonomists. This is what pushed the Ukrainians to commit to the Minsk Agreements.
But just after signing the Minsk 1 Agreements, the Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko launched a massive “anti-terrorist operation” against the Donbass.
Poorly advised by NATO officers, the Ukrainians suffered a crushing defeat in Debaltsevo, which forced them to engage in the Minsk 2 Agreements.
It is essential to recall here that Minsk 1 (September 2014) and Minsk 2 (February 2015) Agreements did not provide for the separation or independence of the Republics, but their autonomy within the framework of Ukraine.
Those who have read the Agreements (there are very few who actually have) will note that it is written that the status of the Republics was to be negotiated between Kiev and the representatives of the Republics, for an internal solution within Ukraine.
That is why since 2014, Russia has systematically demanded the implementation of the Minsk Agreements while refusing to be a party to the negotiations, because it was an internal matter of Ukraine.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1