Comments by "David Houseman" (@davidhouseman4328) on "UK sending Ukraine rocket launchers to hit back at Russian artillery" video.

  1. In the UK we use what ever we feel like at the time.
    2
  2. Simply because we don't have many. Long range fires is an area we had highlighted as needing to improve ourselves before this conflict so even giving some is a show of commitment.
    2
  3.  @Durgesuth  we might a send a few more but we won't send a lot because we simply don't have many and need them for ourselves.
    2
  4. Why would you think you'd be asked? Its a representative democracy not a direct one.
    2
  5. It's sent Ceasar howitzers but it's generally been quiet about what it's sending. There a balance between informing your public and informing the enemy.
    2
  6.  @VanderlyndenJengold  Feet and Stones are pretty common for a persons height and weight.
    1
  7. Where's the profit in giving weapons?
    1
  8. $40bn is over a future period not already given, and the UK has given more than $750m, last time I looked we'd given more as a % of our economy. Also we aren't in danger from Russia either.
    1
  9. They might be destroyed but they wont be taken. Russia are grinding slowly with artilllery not making fast manoeuvres that could capture one.
    1
  10. It not just the UK and US other european countries are sending kit too.
    1
  11. It basically forward defence. Our island has been relatively untouched over the years because we fight away from home. Helping someone else fight means even our troops aren't at risk.
    1
  12. @14ALL41OK Putin can commit suicide any time he wants, nothing has changed on that regard. Nuclear threats by Putin against the UK are hollow.
    1
  13. That would only make sense if we were arming both sides. If Ukraine is weak Russia has no need to sit down and talk.
    1
  14. Ballistic missiles are a bad fit for a mobile target.
    1