Comments by "Acid Joke" (@PWMoze) on "Piers Morgan Uncensored"
channel.
-
93
-
2
-
Brand has yet to be proven guilty of anything. He has been accused in the media (not in a court of law) by people who have remained anonymous, who take no responsibility for their accusations and have yet to have their accusations be examined legally.
As yet, as far as I know, the police have taken no action. No evidence has been properly presented or properly examined. As such, by law, Brand is currently innocent, crucially, UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.
In the meantime it seems Big Tech and the MSM have the right to pre-emptively punish him by stopping him from making his money and removing his content? If the newspapers, Youtube, Netflix, Channel 4 and the BBC can prove his misdeeds, or that he is a predatory actor or that in some other way he has offended public decency (after profiting from his content for over 20 years incidentally) why have they not referred him to the police?
Something very fishy is going on here. It seems Brand is deliberately being unplatformed and destroyed without being given any right of reply or a chance to legally defend himself. That may seem okay to people who don't like him (or rather his public persona) but imagine it happening to anyone else. Similarly people are now reluctant to object to this process in case they are seen as defending the man, rather than his right to defend himself in a court of law. It's like a Kafka story.
1
-
1