Comments by "Acid Joke" (@PWMoze) on "The Weaponisation of Anti-vaxxer | Dr Aseem Malhotra" video.

  1. I am not an 'anti-vaxer' but I have made the following observations: At first we were assured in the MSM that if you got vaccinated you couldn't contract Covid. We now know that is not true. We were also told that all age groups had an equal need to be vaccinated to make us all safe and protect the NHS. We now know that younger people are much less vunerable to Covid and vaccinating them did not protect elderly people, as it was the government putting infected people in care homes that represented the greatest risk to the most vunerable. We were assured that you couldn't spread Covid if you were vaccinated, hence the necessity for less effected age groups to get vaccinated. We now know that isn't true either. On the basis of those assertions we were encouraged to think we would all need regular boosters. We now know that not to be true as boosters do not stop you contracting Covid, suffering with it and in some cases even dying. We were given very little acces to discussions around these assertions, to the point that people who did platform discussions expressing concern or scepticism were subject to virulent mainstream condemnation by the media. ill informed celebrities even waded in with their essertion of the dogma. Neil Young vs Joe Rogan comes to mind. We were not told that Pfizer had bought the intellectual property of the vaccine (developed at public expense) to then sell it back to those countries who paid to develop it at a huge profit, not at cost and not in the least bit subsidised for third world countries and those in desperate need. Pfizer are now one of the most successful Corporations in the world who's shares have soared despite a very shady past and many ongoing outstanding legal problems. We were never warned that the public would eventually only offered the Pfizer vaccination and that the provider of that vaccine actually had a huge influence over the MSM, through advertising and direct investment, and cculd control the debate over their obvious monopoly. We were not told that Pfizer researchers and even the BMA were concerned that data collected during trials of the vaccine 'lacked integrity' and that the discussion of these concerns would be removed from platforms such as Facebook and Youtube. We were not told that unqualified employees of various media platforms such as Facebook and Youtube would have the power to close down and remove the discussion of these kind of concerns without explanation, justification, debate or the opportunity to a defence. We were not told that without a vaccine you could be discriminated against to the point of requiring an identity card or that your bank accounts could be frozen by the state if you were to actually demonstrate against compulsory vaccination as in the case of the truckers in Canada. We were not encouraged to think of it as the state taking control of our bodies or to question the necessity of that situation. No one expected the right to freedom of speech and expression on this subject to be limited or your right to independently research the facts relating to this circumstance to be limited of directly censored. We were not warned that there may actually be more than one valid way to view this whole situation and more than one orthodoxy, even in the science that supports the vaccine's use. We were lied to, manipulated and made to accept some very fundamental rights being undermined. But apart from that the vaccine is okay.
    5