Comments by "Acid Joke" (@PWMoze) on "Zeihan on Geopolitics" channel.

  1. 304
  2. Probably Peter's most inaccurate video so far. UK food hasn't been 'bleuurggh' for decades. In the UK we enjoy one of the most varied cuisines in the World, our shops have a huge variety of internationally and locally sourced food at a wide range of price points, our various high street restaurants feature food styles from all over the globe. British food is much more cosmopolitan and healthy than in the US. We also have much better food regulation than in the US and our farms are increasingly becoming more innovative and environmentally progressive than those in the EU since Brexit. The main problem UK farmers currently face is the unpredictable weather. Add to that the lack of EU subsidies which have not yet been adequately replaced and the as yet unreconciled burden of regulations left over from the pre-Brexit era. You could possibly add to that list the growing suspicion that the new Labour government hates them more than Stalin hated the Kulaks! The new Inheritance tax is intended to stop the super wealthy from using land ownership as a way to avoid paying tax. By forcing the sale of previously unused farmland It is intended to lower the cost of land and stop huge amounts of land being allowed to be unproductive. Farmers are protesting about the way, by setting the threshold too low, it will also stop the owners of medium and smaller farms from being able to be pass their farms from one generation to the next, breaking the continuity of long standing and traditional small holdings. It will not necessarily destroy domestic agriculture but it may well transfer the ownership of agricultural land and possibly change it's use. In fact it is highly likely that much of the land that will eventually be sold will inevitably be taken up by global corporate agricultural concerns, possibly making the use of the land even more efficient. It may also encourage a shift towards solar and wind power production on otherwise unproductive land. Throughout this predicted transition British food will not be 'bleaurrgghh' and UK farms will continue as they always have: rich in assets and poor in cash. Sorry Peter, this video was bollocks. Come to the UK and check it out. And by the way, what's the deal with all the refereces to being 'white'. Is that relevant? Would farmers be better if they weren't white? I don't get it...?
    127
  3. 102
  4. 78
  5. 67
  6. 58
  7. 24
  8. 23
  9. 18
  10.  @VittamarFasuthAkbin  I'm not sure if Brexit isolated the UK, certainly we struggled without access to the single market at first but we have started to increase exports lately. Meanwhile we have had record numbers of Indian, Nigerian, Pakistani, Bangla Deshi, Ghanaian, Middle Eastern and North African immigrants over the last three years. Add to that tens of thousands of Chinese students each year. Not exactly splendid isolation, more like open borders in all but name. We have seen Net immigration of over 700,000 each year, requiring a new city the size of Birminham to be built every two years to accomodate them. As for 'strong man' policies, our prisons are currently so over crowded we are now officially allowing prisoners to be released after serving only half their sentences. Out illegal immigration population is costing over £8m per day to accomodate them in hotels, hostels and privately rented apartments. Shop-lifting and burglary goes unpunished, only 2% of rapes are successfully prosecuted, benefit fraud is increasing and tax avoidance by the wealthy is endemic. Thatcherism has much to answer for in that our publicly owned utilities were all privatised and now we receive much more expensive but lower quality, poorly regulated services, but the real culprits are the successive Tory governments that under invested in our country over the last 14 years and have pretty much bankrupted us. We now have the highest tax burden since WW2, rocketing National debt, the lowest GDP per capita in decades, low growth, social decline, sectarian division all propped up by enforced mass immigration, which the Tories specifically promised to limit and then didn't.
    12
  11. 11
  12. 10
  13. 8
  14. 6
  15. 6
  16. 6
  17. 5
  18. 5
  19. 5
  20. 4
  21. 4
  22. 4
  23. 4
  24.  @Michaelw777.52  I'm a massive fan too and certainly wouldn't feel well informed enough to disagree with his data or his analysis. I know from various long form seminars of his that have dealt with demograhic change that the UK firmly falls within the group with an aging population (the upside down pyramid analogy) with the final wave of 'boomers' now moving into retirement without sufficient numbers to be replaced in the work force. I'm interested in Peter's take on the UK because we have relied upon immigration to counter this demographic trend since the sixties but of course we now, post Bexit, have had a seriies of governments that have placed themselves against the principle of immigration on cultural grounds while continuing to allow immigration on economic grounds (often without fully owning that fact in public). It would seem that we don't want immigrants from Europe, despite how useful they may be to our economy and society, but continue to rely heavily upon economic migrants from Africa and S.E. Asia. I would be interested to know how Peter thinks the UK could deal with this obvious dichotomy. Germany, with their aging population, take in millions of migrant workers and asylum seekers each year, while here in the UK we are encouraged to think of them as 'the enemy' by the popular press and a scourge that has to be stamped out by at least two of the last Home Secretaries. We know that concern over immigration was a huge part of the pro Brexit vote and yet we now find many of our businesses and public services simply can not find sufficient labour to function properly, especially the NHS. What is the answer? Is immigration a necessity to a country like ours or is there another way that our political leaders and economists are unaware of or ignoring?
    3
  25.  @Michaelw777.52  It is interesting that you should suggest India as a possible economic/immigration partner for the UK. We have a long tradition of immigration from the Indian subcontinent in the UK, especially in the sixties and seventies. Most of the children and grand children of those immigrants are now a fundamental part of our society just as you describe in your previous comment. Our current PM, Home Secretary, Mayor of London are all part of that diaspora. The list is quite extensive. However in more recent times India has quite consciously positioned itself, politically and economically, quite separately from the UK. For example the Indian government has failed to support sanctions against Russia and still involves itself in various economic relationships with China which the UK is becoming increasingly suspicious of. In many ways India is asserting its global independence now and has turned away from its traditional links with the UK. Instead we have an ever closer relationship with Bangladesh, Pakistan and certain West African nations such as Ghana and Nigeria. In recent governmental statistics on immigration by far the majority came from those countries. This in itself is very ironic as most anti immigration sentiment in Britain before Brexit was not actually directed at the Poles, Czechs or Romanians who were entering Britain because of EU freedoms, but rather the African communities but especially the largely muslim Pakistani and Bangla Deshi communities that were seen as dangerously anti Western in their ideology and religion. Thisnis of course was a narrative that was widely promoted by the right wing mainstream press and was instrumental in the anti EU sentiment prior to the Brexit referendum..however misplaced that logic may now seem. In other words, the UK was very sensitive to issues surrounding immigration and continues to be. Those issues always include a distrust of other races, religions and cultures and the fear of being 'replaced' culturally and socially. Once again, very ironic considering our history of immigration from our empire, Ireland, Eastern Europe, Protestant France etc etc, We are a nation built on immiration going back to the Romans, the Celts, the Vikings and the Normans. I won't bother mentioning the prehistoric 'beaker people'. Its almost like a running joke. This is my question to Peter. Given that British people have always been quite reluctant to openly embrace immigration, particularly from other ethnicities, how can we possibly address our population drop off? On a lighter note check out this link, it says it all much better than I ever could, https://youtu.be/1cgeXd5kRDg
    3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29.  @SignalCorps1  It is sad if unions are 'a waste of time' in the USA. I'm not sure how it works from state to state in the US, but in the UK, unions provide workers with a means of 'collective bargaining'. That means no individual worker can be punished or intimidated for seeking to protect themselves when in conflict with their employer. They do not only represent you in negotiations on wages but also in disciplinary matters, providing legal advice and legal representation. They can protect your working conditions and working practise as well as consulting with management over contracts and regulation on your behalf. They can even lobby for companies to be sanctioned or regulated by government on behalf of their members. They can provide workers with training and education and even career advancement in some cases. They can provide hardship funds during disputes and can link with other associated unions to provide support and solidarity during prelonged strike action. In the UK they have been traditionally linked to the Parliamentary Labour Party so they can also provide a route to the legislature, effecting policy and shaping the national debate. Some union activists have eventually taken up seats in the government. They have even brought down a government or two! In most Scandinavian countries they are an essential part of industrial, economic and social policy making. Its not just about wages, its about giving you representation, fighting to make sure your work place is safe, to make sure you are treated with dignity and to make sure you are not exploited by your employer. There is strength within a union.
    3
  30. 3
  31.  @ILikeFreedomYo  in the UK we don't have a constitution just a complicated set of historic statutes.Education budgets are set by a combination of the Chancellor and the Exchequer. The same applies to healthcare, the police, the army etc etc. These budgets are then paid to local and municipal governments, regional health authorities and regional police authorities, who can then allocate the money as they see fit. Some are better than others at doing this, some have different priorities. All of them have been experiencing lower budgets i(n real terms, when taking into account inflation) probably since 2008. Subsequently many local education authorities have put constraints on education spending for many years, this is reflected in salaries and the working conditions. Similarly in hospitals have had to pay staff less and cut back on repairs and renewals. The police and the army have severely cut their numbers. Public sector workers have had the right to strike and have had it for over 100 years. Obviously they don't feel they should give that right up, so successive governments have restricted what they can do through the law. The general public in this country are split about the degree of freedom unions should have, while public sector workers have some of the strongest and well supported unions in the country. They also have some of the most poorly paid and under valued jobs. With professions like nurses and teachers there is a historic reluctance to strike, with the police and the army it is simply illegal. But also in these occupatiins there is a reluctance to leave the profession (because it is seen as a vocation) and this may explain why they are often so under valued and poorly paid. Meanwhile the government has allowed their terms and condiions to deteriorate for almost a decade, subsequently there are some that want to strike but also many who see they have no choice and are reluctantly leaving the professions. If you want good services provided by competent professionals you have to pay them fairly and value the work they do, otherwise you get very poorly delivered services, industrial disputes and societal disharmony. That is what we are currently experiencing in the UK. The strikes and the urge to strike are a symptom of the maliase, not its cause. The cause is over a decade of austerity, shocks to the economy, Brexit fall out, poor government oversight, ideological conflict, a cost of living crisis and declining standards of living.
    3
  32. 3
  33. 3
  34. 3
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. An excellent and balanced assessment Peter. Your conclusion that things are about to 'crack and break' seems to be true both in the region and internationally. This conflict is radicalising, dividing and mobilising people in most of the Western democracies, and seems to be on track to continue that process. It is creating sectarian division, a political generation gap, civil and political unrest on a par with the anti Vietnam War/civil rights protests in the sixties. Perhaps the division at the moment is even worse thanbthe sixties because it involves sectarian division as well as political/social and cultural. In the UK, especially in London, we have seen the weekly protest marches create a system of two tier policing, with pro Gaza marchers being allowed to publicly voice support for Hamas, use hate speech, express violent anti semitism, deface monuments: while anti Islamist/nationalist marchers are treated much more ruthlesely by the police and also vilified in the media. We have also seen blatantly biased and inaccurate reporting of the conflict in the mainstream media with the BBC unable to even call Hamas terrorists. Media platforms have provided 'bad actors' with opportunities to spread disinformation and media coverage is often openly biased. We have had Parliament process derailed because MPS were being bullied by fanatics, MPs lives threatened forcing resignations and the subsequent rise of political Islamism in our local elections. We now have a whole range of politicians who believe they were elected to represent Palestinians rather than their constituents. Clearly this situation has enraged the right wingers and simultaneously radicalised and mobilised those who believe in Islamic political ideology. In general everyone has an opinion, usually poorly rearched and lacking historical accuracy, no one considers the other side moral or compassionate enough to consider debating with them in good faith and no one is seeking to find common ground. This conflict is influencing our general election, local politics and dividing opinion on a par with the whole Brexit debate. We now debate Israel more than our own domestic social/economic/political problems and are obviously unable to do a thing to to influence the situation either way. Things are indeed cracking and breaking.
    2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1