Comments by "Yep YEP!" (@yepyep340) on "'Let Me Just Push You A Little Bit': Coney Barrett Presses Attorney On Congressional Power Over EPA" video.

oh sure sure lets just deregulate everything. Take the blinders of the bridal soes the horse runs all over creation, and doesn't stay in it's lane. Then eats the garden so we go back to the state of nature and eat each other. Brilliant
3
Redd Dogg 774 and counting gona hang them in the morning before the night is done' gona hang them in the morning may they never see the sun'
2
@wendyw2118 Ashley Babbitt 2 time Obama voter, self employed service provider, victim of predatory lending, she was aggrieved. 45 radicalized her; sold her instillment. Now she is dead. My country was here long before you, and does NOT owe you a damn thing. I will bind the the corpses together. Float and stem the tied.
2
@Saratogan Well that load will defiantly "Break away regions" go sign a decree Putin. 50 states my arse! what do we need with W Virginia and Virgina, N & S Dakota, N & S Carolina. Etc. etc.Each having 2 senators essentially 4. Are insitutions are the driver of this persute of a more perfect Union. Not the democracy
2
@dustin9132 sincere apologies. To much Damn "Covfefe"
2
Let them rot!
1
@biruss come on man! Guy Refit had a video camera on his helmet. 5 counts HA! you still wearing your viking hat and your mankine ?
1
@biruss "trespassing" in the USA's symbol of our democracy (the capital) waving the confederate flag. Is saying that The "civil war" has not yet been finished. I could not agree more. Like Leonidas kicked the Persian messenger into the well. I will do the same.
1
@biruss you are correct we are not under "Persian" law. Because we are not tribes. We are a Nation not of men but Law. Law is reason without desire. It is essential in a republic. John Adams I will get to your next reply
1
@biruss Judges have ruled. IMO Proportionately to the crimes so far. But I'm not a judge.
1
@biruss agreed sorry I'm so provocative. But rest assured wiel in jail they knock each others teeth out. Soes when they brutalize one another nothing gets bit off.
1
@Saratogan Most people do not really want freedom, because freedom involves responsibility, and most people are frightened of responsibility. Freedom Convoy was a bunch of irresponsible spoiled federalist thinking they gots a grip on originalism. Good they got to see the whip!
1
@Saratogan Your the one dreaming of the Federalism of the 1930's. Your Edman Burke point of view is not original, and Textualism is just as abysmal. The dead founding White supremacist left us a LIVING Constitution. We got Cooperative Federalism. It is "optimizing". States that do not recognize climate change have already "revealed them selfs" Carrot's have been presented, but the stick must be used. Why? corporations are NOT people. Article 1 section 8 clause 11 should be for the people not corporations. Carbon emissions are simply a real thing, not only costing us treasure and billions of $$$. Peak oil, and coal production is long gone. Like all your "hopes". Never let your schooling get in the way of your education.
1
@Saratogan your either an enviromentalist or counter environmentalist. You do not deserve any Federalism. If your not Cooperative in permoting the general welfare. May your sedition be to your demise.
1
@biruss textualism is a method of statutory interpetation whereby the plain text of the statute is used to determine the meaning of legislation. We agree to attempt to determine the statutory purpose or intent. This is what the vid shows. Agree that yes we are a republic but a have Cooperative federalism. We simply agree that the fed and the states have common interest. So to share freedoms FROM each other. FREEDOM FROM POLLUTION! These states do not really want their citizens to have freedom, because freedom involves responsibility, and they are frightened of the responsibility. why? are the senators and goveners owned by oil and gas, coal company's just looking for 1/4 profits not concerned with disasters in other states? perhaps right?
1
@biruss good question. But first we must consider if the Constitution is a living document or a dead document. Either is augmentative to some. I err on this side of history. Lets just consider the 7th amendment. The concept of "common law" but in common law there is no legal definition of living together. So lets say in the 14th amendment. But then ya got to believe in the since that mans behavior can effect the air you breath, the water you drink, the environment you live in. The goal is to be a man of action, but act like men of thought. when I say man I mean mankind.
1
@biruss is so reactive. Wouldn't Being proactive in life make a healthier life.
1
@biruss yep! isn't great to bring so much atention to this? This reminds me of Anne Gorsuch she was the head of the EPA once. Yep! Neil's mama.
1
@biruss well isn't that cute by half. The EPA wins most of it's cases. But the R's put some bad dudes up there. In the end; history shows when this happens it always gets worse right before it gets better. One of the reasons of 45 being a 1 timmer. Personally I think the Green New Deal policy's are weak. After The knitting of the clean air act I would just unilaterally knock the industries teeth out. Then let them try to impeach me wiel I continued to brutalized them.
1
@dustin9132 stick it
1