Comments by "" (@user-hf1pg2ey6l) on "Attorney General reviewing whether Nottingham attacker's sentence is too lenient" video.

  1. This decision on sentencing needs to be reversed. He cannot get away with what he did out of hate and envy. He needs to be in prison for life. Otherwise this will set an awful precedent. Who is the judge.
    69
  2. Plus assaults in the past including a police officer - he was not charged for those crimes either.
    23
  3.  @constantinvaldor3742  How is that relevant.
    16
  4. Or deportation, stripping of citizenship, whatever it takes.
    15
  5. He is fooling all the "professionals".
    13
  6.  @madontherun  The professionals are not experts either. Give over.
    6
  7.  @madontherun  He is eligible to be released in 3 years if deemed "recovered" by the experts.
    5
  8. Released in 3 years if the professionals deem he is no longer a threat to society.
    5
  9. They are still totally supported by taxpayers for life. Three meals, TV, internet, video games, a cushy warm bed. Nah that doesn't fly, he is fooling everyone.
    5
  10.  @madontherun  Rather cushy. Are you victim blaming or minimising for some reason?
    4
  11.  @philippedley5073  Yep - the "professionals" concluded he needs to be coddled instead of paying for his crime. His victims were killed in cold blood but still they make excuses for him and taxpayers have to support him.
    4
  12.  @pdlawson-venusloon359  The panel should be sacked as they are just being irresponsible with very dangerous people.
    4
  13.  @SteelSunday  Oh and he is not charged with murder. It was downgraded to "involuntary manslaughter" per the "professionals".
    4
  14.  @johnmanning5568  So now he gets to probably be released in 3 years because he was "cured". Thats a better solution for you and for society?
    3
  15. Yes, in 3 years he could be released. The judge did not impose the section that said he could not be released.
    3
  16.  @BenjWarrant  Not true. It is to protect the general public. He is not going to murder the state is he.
    2
  17.  @BenjWarrant  Representing the people then? Go away.
    2
  18.  @SteelSunday  I suggest you look it up before you comment. It was all over the media yesterday.
    2
  19.  @johnmanning5568  Not my guess. It was in the media so keep your criticism to yourself. Also the judge did not implement the section where he could have barred him from being released but he did not.
    2
  20. 3 years actually, if he "recovers".
    2
  21. Exactly. If the shoe was on the other foot so to speak we would not hear the end of it.
    2
  22.  @CiCi-Love  Yes but he would never be released. Also he is eligible to be released in 3 years. Happy now?
    2
  23.  @CiCi-Love  Either way it is a travesty or justice and needs to be reversed.
    2
  24. How about his possible release in 3 years if he is deemed as "recovered" from his "condition"?
    1
  25.  @PrivateWalker  Really? Can't face the facts? This was pure hatred of white people, whether you can confront that fact or not.
    1
  26.  @johnmanning5568  I don't read the sun. You have just proven yourself. Go away.
    1
  27. Typical British lib, they all are.
    1