Comments by "Patchwurk" (@patchwurk6652) on "David Addresses The TYT ‘Birthing Person’ Controversy" video.

  1.  @johnc3525  "Steal." Oh please, do lay out how we "stole" the word and what it'd be "replaced" with. I'd love to hear that explained.
    3
  2.  @johnc3525  How vague. "Too far" meaning.....?
    2
  3.  @johnc3525  Ohhh, you're one of the Matt Walshers. In order: 1: Define woman (and if your response is "an adult human female" define female in a way that isn't reducing your entire "grand stance" on gender to "boys have penis girls have vagina", because I'm gonna laugh at you if your definition of gender is directly ripped from an Arnold movie) 2: And that definition of identity is bad because....? And 3: Every human competes, what exactly are you objecting to? ...Oh, wait, let me guess: you're just objecting to trans women in sports.
    2
  4.  @johnc3525  "Matt Walsher? No, I'm scientifically-trained, accept reality and believe that feelings come second to truth." Pfff, scientifically-trained huh? That come with an actual set of credentials or are you counting middle-school chemistry as "training"? "the fact that whatever movie you're referring to has a simple explanation of sex that works for 99% of people goes to show that it's not that complicated." ....Holy shit you actually are getting your definition from a Schwarzenegger flick. XD Fuck you're stupid! The hell are you doing here besides letting your freak flag fly? "You can split hairs and claim that a definition has to include 100% of the people to be real but it doesn't change the fact that most people can intuitively identified at least 90% of true women." Oh really? Then please, tell me, what is a "true woman?" "1. a vagina 2. a uterus 3. ovaries 4. sex hormones within a certain ratio range 5. capacity of giving birth at some point in their lives 6. capacity of feeding their babies using their breasts 7. capacity to menstruate at some point in their lives 8. capacity to pass on their mitochondria to their babies 9. XX chromosomes 10. producing large gametes" Translation: "Boys have a Pee-Pee and Girls have a Vagina!" Thanks for the baby's first sex ed class genius, but sex and gender aren't referring to the same shit. You're describing sex, and even then you're only Literally describing reproductive characteristics. That all women are to you? A fuck-hole that produces little You-gremlins? "The definition is bad because the definition above works, is well accepted, is intuitive, based on biology and in reality while the woke definition is circular, ideological, not based on science or anything rational." Wow, suck your own dick some more. Sorry, if your definition was valid it'd be the accepted definition. Sucks to suck, but you don't define language. "If you really can't understand why a definition can't contain the word it's defining, then you are incapable of having a rational/sane conversation." Oh no, I'd need a less disingenuous opponent for that. Sorry, real people get discourse, chuds get mocked. "Yes, men shouldn't compete with women in sports. Or be in their prisons, bathrooms, locker rooms, etc." Good thing they aren't. Next!
    1