Comments by "Patchwurk" (@patchwurk6652) on "Tucker Carlson's New INSANE Defense Of Jan. 6th" video.

@seanmccartney5177 Thanks for instantly validating their point by deflecting to the other Party immediately.
25
@seanmccartney5177 "Or looking at something from a different angle............one that you don't like" Imagine defending Carlson and thinking that makes you look like anything but a hack.
5
@seanmccartney5177 Considering what you people defend, why are you condemning a "sight-seeing trip of reverence?" Are you against violent protest or aren't you?
3
@seanmccartney5177 Holy shit "No U" literally is your only retort to everything.
3
@societylost4344 "you need to watch the complete video of him. Hilarious. You want me to read something rather than look at the evidence. Not a good look." Expecting you to be familiar with the details of a case you're rejecting is "not a good look?" Pretty sure you being utterly ignorant of what you're talking about is a worse look, but don't let me stop you.
2
@seanmccartney5177 How is that a "gotcha"? You literally did as your first comment on this thread exactly what the OP said Rightwing sychophants would do when presented with this information: Ignore it and deflect to Democrats. How is it a "gotcha" when you're proving that our assessment of you people is dead on balls accurate?
1
@Mellowyellow3 Well for a start, how about taking responsibility for Jan 6th instead of trying to blame it on the Left? Or take responsibility without immediately deflecting to BLM or Antifa (as if those guys weren't punished even though plenty were arrested) to try and downplay your actions? Or hey, taking responsibility for Losing instead of accusing everyone who beat you of fraud. Or hey, Not calling Jan 6th a hoax and not siding with Trump's rigged election shit even as their leaked private messages show that they know full-fucking-well it wasn't stolen from Trump, but they're actively lying anyway because "That's what their viewers want to hear." Republicans in politics and the media never take any responsibility for anything bad they do. It's either "The Left did it" or "It's a hoax" or "Whatabout the Dems", anything Except owning what they did. And sure, Establishment Dems don't do it either, but that's the thing: We fucking hate them too. We think they're disgusting traitorous rats. What boggles our mind is this asinine logic on the Right where anything and everything they do is forever justified because "Dems deserve it." Call me crazy, but wouldn't it be better to Stand By a single fucking principle instead of responding to anything low your political opposition does with "I'm gonna go even lower and blame them for it"? Like what message are Non-Dem/Reps supposed to get from either of you besides "There isn't a single honest human being in this entire two-party shitpile and everything would be better if both these worthless parties just fucking died"?
1
@seanmccartney5177 "Actually, I am very much AGAINST violent "PROTESTS" (riots) however do you really think these events are being judged equally?" No, because you people make excuses for Jan 6th you'd never make for a Progressive protest of any kind. If the Left had pulled a Jan 6th you'd be calling for us all to be executed for treason. Also no need for the quotes, protest and riot are not mutually separate concepts. You'd probably know that if your nation didn't do everything to try and criminalize any and all overt expressions of your Right to Protest.
1
@jodie3339 Considering all you need to be "a potential threat" to a cop is give them any sort of offense for any reason or disobey them on any level, not sure why you'd find this hard to believe. Your nation's police are fucking animals.
1
@regular-joe "We don't use violence to protect our system." ...Your national history wants a word. "We use the system itself to protect our democracy when it needs it." How's that work out when your entire system is corrupt and rigged against you? "If we violate the system of laws and responsibilities that we say we're trying to protect, we'll be the ones ultimately destroying our country." They're violating the system of laws and responsibilities and destroying your country.
1
@regular-joe Fuck dude, someone vents a little and you have to belittle it and take it to extreme nihilism? Not exactly disabusing the point you're strawmanning them with are ya?
1
@regular-joe ....Oooookay. Whatever floats your boat dude.
1
@regular-joe Does being a condescending prick sarcastically agreeing with everything anyone who critiques you get you any results? Seems like a pretty poor way to persuade or convince anyone imo if your instant response to dissent is passive-aggressive hostility and just bailing on the convo at any sign of push-back to me. Like I thought we were just disagreeing until you decided to go the petty "fuck you" route.
1
@regular-joe So do you start all your conversations with hyperbolic sarcasm that makes it abundantly clear to the other person how little respect you have for them and their position? Did you think I Wasn't going to feel a certain sort of way being openly strawmanned and talked to like I'm stupid, or do you expect your opposition to be more well-mannered than yourself to engage with? The comment you're referencing was After you'd already opened up the guns and made it clear you weren't having a conversation.
1
@regular-joe "Let's go back to your first comment. If I had made the following reply, what would your response have been? "National history". Yes, it absolutely has had many grim moments. But I'm focusing here on the present and on the changes that can happen in the here and now. " Right. And my question was effectively "How exactly do you plan on doing that without getting your hands dirty?" I mean the corrupt have zero problem using violence and force to get their way against you, zero issue using and abusing corruption against you so that even the civil route isn't viable because they can just "Nope" your efforts away. How do you plan on beating a corrupt violent and vicious enemy without violence? ""Entire system is corrupt". No. Every institution has some corruption, that's just part of human nature, and can and is being fought against. " Right, but Your System as it currently exists does not. Your system as it currently exists almost exclusively advantages the biggest dickhead and most corrupt asshole in the room. ""Destroying the country". Yes, the country is going through hard times now as we work to protect our democracy and freedoms. Again, part of human nature, the fight is eternal" I guess my question is just "How?" Like a genuine A to B here, a gameplan. Because to my observation your nation is running on borrowed time. I don't see how you even Have the Time to do this cleanly when your nation is already teetering on the edge of complete economic and social implosion, and your leadership is a horde of senile geriatrics so proud that they'd rather destroy this nation via incompetence than admit that the world they govern over has truly left them behind and outmoded their entire existence. Like the time for peaceful solutions seems like it was 30 years ago, not 2 minutes to midnight.
1
@regular-joe "Your remarks are full of extremism, that everything and everyone is doomed, the complete and total negation that anything good can ever be accomplished except by violence." But I didn't imply that at all. I just asked "How specifically were you hoping to solve this current situation Without it?" I mean I asked you to lay it out. Like let's just assume you can have your way, your route of doing things is viable at this late date: What's the process? How do we win your way at this point in time? "There's no point in replying reasonably to something where there's no reason involved." ....Y'know for as much as you point out how unreasonable, extreme, and flawed my viewpoint is, you're really lacking in express things I'm wrong about outside of "not agreeing with your assessment." "Thus, sarcasm and dismissal. Ciao." ....I'm not getting an answer to how you plan on actually accomplishing this idea of yours, am I.
1
@seanmccartney5177 Uh huh. Not defending anyone. Right. You just spam "Fuck democrats", "Whatabout democrats", and "but them democrats tho" on every single comment mentioning a Rightwinger for any reason, derail and deflect from rightwingers even when they're the fucking topic to democrats, rail on Left-leaning channels every single day, and apologize for the Right exclusively because "you're not defending anyone." Stop fucking lying, you're not fooling anyone. There exists No One on this planet to defends a fucking thing Carlson says who isn't a partisan hack.
1