Comments by "Patchwurk" (@patchwurk6652) on "NYPD Arrest 29 Grandparents Over Climate Protest" video.

  1.  @X2LR8  And the bootlicker shows up.
    5
  2.  @rb239rtr  YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO PROTEST YOU ASS! "Doing their job" does NOT include brazen violations of the Constitution just because a rich man said so.
    3
  3.  @rb239rtr  "so these people can sue for false arrest and get millions, or the arrests were legal." Ohh, so it's only illegal if someone can afford to sue for it. Nice excuse to simp for the cops. "People have the right to protest, but they do not have the right to break the law" Good thing they weren't breaking the law.
    2
  4.  @X2LR8  "Says the New Balance protestor gym shoe licker. And round and round we go!" ...The fuck is this insult? You wanna try that again?
    1
  5.  @X2LR8  ...Yeah, responding to be called a cop-simp with... Whatever the hell that was just makes you sound even sadder.
    1
  6.  @X2LR8  "I care more about a rich man's doorway than people's Constitutional rights and defend cops abusing their power." -This cousinfucker.
    1
  7.  @null_matrix1467  And yet the same freaks hate both and defend the police response to both.
    1
  8.  @null_matrix1467  Sure seems like the same people are always defending the cops cracking down on both though.
    1
  9.  @grmpEqweer  TRESPASSING IS NOT THE SAME AS DISORDERLY CONDUCT YOU SHAMELESS LIAR!
    1
  10.  @alexandergutfeldt1144  PROTESTING IS NOT DISORDERLY CONDUCT! This freak can't even get the reason for arrest right, yet you're defending them for some reason.
    1
  11.  @rb239rtr  "People don't have the right to break the law." Interesting that you seem to be inherently on the side of the cops without context, and your solution of "Oh then they can sue" requires them to be able to AFFORD taking the NYPD to court in the first place. How's the boot taste? " I guess the next spot for these grandmas to go is to abortion clinics because they have the right to protest and they can block the front and back doors from access because, yah, they have the right to protest." Oh look, a deflection to abortion. I wonder if that's because you know you have exactly no excuse here that isn't "I want the cops to get rid of protestors I don't like."
    1
  12.  @rb239rtr  "I guess the next spot for these grandmas to go is to abortion clinics because they have the right to protest and they can block the front and back doors from access because, yah, they have the right to protest." Good job trying to change the subject, too bad I don't care what excuse you're using to simp for cops violating people's rights.
    1
  13.  @rb239rtr  "It does not matter what people are protesting. Unless, of course you want the police to pick and chose which protest to deal with." So do people have a right to protest or is protesting in and of itself grounds to sic the cops on people? Pick one bootlicker!
    1
  14.  @rb239rtr  "If they were false arrests" My God you are shameless. Just admit you're fine with cops violating people's rights if it's a protest you don't like. Cops get away with criminal activity all the time in this miserably corrupt country, the situation you're bringing up is usually outright dismissed in court even when the cop is guilty as sin.
    1
  15.  @rb239rtr  "if these were false arrests, lawyers would be lining up to get a large cut of millions." Ah yes, in the justice system that almost always takes the side of cops, the cops will just get sued without a judge dismissing the charges. How's that boot taste you unAmerican trog?
    1
  16.  @rb239rtr  Translation: Unless someone can afford to sue the cops, the cops can't break the law.
    1
  17.  @rb239rtr  ""It does not matter what people are protesting. Unless, of course you want the police to pick and chose which protest to deal with."" You actively claimed earlier that the cops are obligated to arrest protestors, no matter the protest.
    1
  18.  @rb239rtr  Just admit you want right to protest gotten rid of.
    1